#AcademicSky #EpiSky
@angelahuttner.bsky.social & @marcbonten.bsky.social invite Ilan Schwartz @germhuntermd.bsky.social , Neil Stone @drneilstone.bsky.social & Tara Smith @aetiology.bsky.social to debate staying on or leaving Twitter for alternatives 🎤
#IDTwitter #IDSky #clinmicro
@angelahuttner.bsky.social & @marcbonten.bsky.social invite Ilan Schwartz @germhuntermd.bsky.social , Neil Stone @drneilstone.bsky.social & Tara Smith @aetiology.bsky.social to debate staying on or leaving Twitter for alternatives 🎤
#IDTwitter #IDSky #clinmicro
🎧➡️ pod.fo/e/362998
🎧➡️ pod.fo/e/362998
AI research in question as author claims to have written over 100 papers on AI that one expert calls a ‘disaster’
@aishadown.bsky.social for @theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
AI research in question as author claims to have written over 100 papers on AI that one expert calls a ‘disaster’
@aishadown.bsky.social for @theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/4/1/...
bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/4/1/...
Day 2.
Today's puzzle is about paper mills' red flags! Do you spot the problem?
papermills.tilda.ws/advent2025
1️⃣ LLMs are usefully seen as lossy content-addressable systems
2️⃣ we can't automatically detect plagiarism
3️⃣ LLMs automate plagiarism & paper mills
4️⃣ we must protect literature from pollution
5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI
6️⃣ prompts do not cause output in authorial sense
1️⃣ LLMs are usefully seen as lossy content-addressable systems
2️⃣ we can't automatically detect plagiarism
3️⃣ LLMs automate plagiarism & paper mills
4️⃣ we must protect literature from pollution
5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI
6️⃣ prompts do not cause output in authorial sense
Repost is lief 😊🥰🥰
Repost is lief 😊🥰🥰
Commentary: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Original meta-analysis: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Towards Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacies doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
1/
Towards Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacies doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
1/
sway.cloud.microsoft/Et71m6wUBR3w...
Over and out
Please call me out if you see me on here again today
#SPSP
Here's a nice guide for performing open systematic reviews doi.org/10.1525/coll...
Here's a nice guide for performing open systematic reviews doi.org/10.1525/coll...
doi.org/10.31222/osf...
doi.org/10.31222/osf...
Jullie favoriete nummer (m.u.v. 'Bohemian Rhapsody')?
Jullie favoriete nummer (m.u.v. 'Bohemian Rhapsody')?
This is false.
But this is damaging, even beyond people’s confidence in vaccines.
For the first time in my career, I cannot tell people to trust what the CDC website without hesitation.
This is false.
But this is damaging, even beyond people’s confidence in vaccines.
For the first time in my career, I cannot tell people to trust what the CDC website without hesitation.
⏰ Deadline: 15 Dec 2025
#IDSky #clinmicro #virology #virosky
⏰ Deadline: 15 Dec 2025
#IDSky #clinmicro #virology #virosky
Participate in R4E's online seminar on November 19th at 10 a.m. Eastern Time/4 p.m. Central European Time. This event welcomes all inquisitive individuals. For more information, check out: repro4everyone.org/blog/r4e-spo...
#academicchatter #academicsky
Participate in R4E's online seminar on November 19th at 10 a.m. Eastern Time/4 p.m. Central European Time. This event welcomes all inquisitive individuals. For more information, check out: repro4everyone.org/blog/r4e-spo...
#academicchatter #academicsky
Too many labs think omics-related research is "just sequencing innit".
Too many labs think omics-related research is "just sequencing innit".
Also, this is why you use R for statistics...
(and of course the correct CI method is bayes 😎)
Also, this is why you use R for statistics...
(and of course the correct CI method is bayes 😎)
Read the full opinion piece in @cp-neuron.bsky.social: spkl.io/63322AbxpA
@wiringthebrain.bsky.social, @statsepi.bsky.social, & @deevybee.bsky.social
Read the full opinion piece in @cp-neuron.bsky.social: spkl.io/63322AbxpA
@wiringthebrain.bsky.social, @statsepi.bsky.social, & @deevybee.bsky.social
Interessante actie, maar is dit onderzoek of preventie (de tekst is wat ambigu)? Als je van alle acute problemen gaat tellen hoeveel mensen vapen, ga je in elk geval geen causaal verband aan kunnen tonen. Of mis ik iets?
Interessante actie, maar is dit onderzoek of preventie (de tekst is wat ambigu)? Als je van alle acute problemen gaat tellen hoeveel mensen vapen, ga je in elk geval geen causaal verband aan kunnen tonen. Of mis ik iets?