Matthias Enggist
@matthiasenggist.bsky.social
860 followers 530 following 15 posts
Postdoctoral researcher in Political Science at University of Lausanne | PhD @IPZ, University of Zurich | welfare state politics, public opinion, party competition, immigration, political geography
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
dpzollinger.bsky.social
Even in times of sociocultural conflict, a progressive left electorate is more averse to sociocultural *and* socioeconomic inequalities than (far) right voters.

New paper with @siljahausermann.bsky.social Palmtag @tabouchadi.bsky.social @stefwalter.bsky.social Berkinshaw
tinyurl.com/d42wyb79

1/n
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
alexanderhorn.bsky.social
1/3) 📣Out in Party Politics:
We trace the equal rights and economic equality positions of 69 center-right and far-right parties since 1970 in 12 countries. We find that center right parties did not react to/address equal rights concerns and economic inequality

journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10....
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
prashantgarg.bsky.social
New (first! 🥳) Publication 🚨

High-street retail vacancies, capturing economic decline, are linked to increased support of UK's populist party, UKIP (now Reform).
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
juliusk.bsky.social
What are the political consequences of long-term population loss? In a new paper for German Politics @benjaminhoehne.bsky.social, Hendrik Träger and I find that East German places more affected by depopulation provided stronger support for the AfD in recent state elections.🧵👇
shorturl.at/cujwa
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
alexanderhorn.bsky.social
In Social progress at the expense of economic equality? we ask if equal rights or equal chances concerns crowded out economic equality as priority of the Left? Mapping equality concepts 1970-2020: not green or far-left parties. Yet, social democrats … 1/2
ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
alexanderhorn.bsky.social
Did German left parties abandon economic equality in favor of equal rights, as the diagnosis of the "Lifestyle-Left" suggests? Analyzing party programs since 1970, we caution against sweeping claims in Unequal German Democracy (open access). 3 key qualifications👇
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
9/ Many thanks to @macarenaares.bsky.social, @alexanderhorn.bsky.social, @evehubscher.bsky.social and many others for providing invaluable feedback on previous versions of this paper.
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
8/ 🟢 Generational differences among GAL voters may reshape the future of social policies directed at the most vulnerable groups. If differences reflect cohort effects (as we assume but cannot empirically test), social assistance could soon lose one of its key support groups.
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
7/ What does this tell us?
🟢 The second dimension of political conflict matters for welfare preferences – it shapes which specific welfare programs are prioritized.
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
6/ These age difference findings are almost exclusively driven by West Germany (as we expected), where early GAL mobilization was more closely tied to left-wing, anti-capitalist movements than in East Germany.
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
5/ However, younger GAL voters, socialized in a context, in which the GALTAN cleavage is dominated by the radical right, do not attach particular importance to social assistance. What they really care about is social investment.
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
4/ Among elderly GAL voters, who were socialized into the GALTAN cleavage when it was dominated by post-1968 New Social Movements, the importance of social assistance benefits is higher than among TAN voters.
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
3/ Meanwhile, TAN voters strongly favor pensions – more so than GAL voters. The picture is less clear for social assistance and unemployment benefits, but we uncover important age differences in how GAL voters see social assistance.
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
2/ In line with previous research (e.g. @garritzmannj.bsky.social, @mbusemeyer.bsky.social, @eneimanns.bsky.social), we show that GAL voters are more supportive of and find expansion more important for social investment policies (university education, childcare, active labour market policies).
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
1/ Using original survey data from 🇩🇪, we show that GAL and TAN voters differ in their welfare preferences (measured by positions, importance and conjoint experiments) - even when controlling for first dimension, economic attitudes.
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
New publication in @wepsocial.bsky.social with @retobuergisser.bsky.social, @siljahausermann.bsky.social, and Michael Pinggera. We map the welfare preferences of voters at the poles of the second, GALTAN dimension of political conflict. 🧵
wepsocial.bsky.social
Online first & open access:

"The welfare preferences of socially liberal and socially conservative voters"

by @matthiasenggist.bsky.social @retobuergisser.bsky.social @siljahausermann.bsky.social & Michael Pinggera

doi.org/10.1080/0140...

#Polisky #Academicsky
Abstract of the article "The welfare preferences of socially liberal and socially conservative voters" by Matthias Enggist, Reto Bürgisser, Silja Häusermann and Michael Pinggera. Published online first in West European Politics. Figure 3, displaying AMCEs from conjoint experiment for people at the poles of the GALTAN dimension. Figure 4, displaying the relationship of GALTAN attitudes with unconstrained importance attributed to social policies by age. Figure 5, displaying AMCEs from conjoint experiment for people aged 70 (top panel) and people aged 30 (bottom panel), shown for the people at the poles of the GALTAN dimension.
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
macarenaares.bsky.social
Happy to share this paper, now online at the JoP
about attitudinal consistency in welfare reform preferences with Silja Häusermann @matthiasenggist.bsky.social & Michael Pinggera
👉 journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
alexandreafonso.bsky.social
New in the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies: we find that telling people that refugees have access to welfare makes them a bit less open to refugee migration, but only a bit, and it's mostly driven by people who didn't like migration in the first place.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
alexandreafonso.bsky.social
New paper (*explosion-emoji-bam!-pow!*) forthcoming with the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies: we test whether granting welfare access to refugees changes people's attitudes towards refugee migration. Preprint: osf.io/preprints/os...
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Matthias Enggist
tabouchadi.bsky.social
We just launched the Progressive Politics Research Network. On our website (politicscentre.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/go/pprn) you can find more information and our 6 research briefs on the theme of Rethinking Progressive Politics Based on Facts Rather than Myths. A summary of our theme and findings here:
matthiasenggist.bsky.social
We measure welfare chauvinism policies using ImmigSR data, which Eloisa collected w/Friederike Römer and Jakob Henninger.
Thanks to European Political Science Review for giving us a home & those who gave feedback on drafts: @julianachueri.bsky.social , Silja Häusermann, Samir Negash, Leonce Röth.