Matthew Martin
banner
mattm1981.bsky.social
Matthew Martin
@mattm1981.bsky.social
Lives in Plymouth, from Kidderminster.
#RejoinEU 🔶️🌹🟢
Reposted by Matthew Martin
GB News literally "wearing a poppy."

What does that actually mean?

Have they donated to the Royal British Legion to earn it?

Or is "gesture news" now a thing?
November 7, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
I knew Gill and Farage and the rest of the UKIP crew in the European Parliament

They were crooks and shysters to a man

They repeated Putin talking points and appeared on Russia Today

UKIP then and Reform now are both a threat to our democracy

www.theguardian.com/news/ng-inte...
Reform UK, the Russian spy and rolls of Kremlin cash: the inside story of Nathan Gill
How did a former Mormon bishop end up pleading guilty to taking bribes to make statements in favour of Russia in the European parliament?
www.theguardian.com
November 2, 2025 at 8:20 AM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
Looking forward to this online event on Thursday with @nataliegreenpeer.bsky.social. After Zarah Sultana's ill-considered remarks, it's vital to listen to Green left voices from Ukraine.

Being Green can't mean neutrality in the face of imperialist war criminals.
www.eventbrite.com/e/the-green-...
The Green Party + Ukraine – discussion with Natalie Bennett & Sofiia Bodun
Discussions with Green peer Natalie Bennett; Sofiia Bodun of the Party of Greens of Ukraine; and Ukrainian climate activist Viktoriya Ball
www.eventbrite.com
October 28, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
If anything, @mrjamesob.bsky.social, the top 1% paying c.30% of total income tax only shows how completely skewed the income distribution has become.

When you take all taxes into account, the poor pay far more of their income in tax than the top 1% by a wide margin.

@lbc.co.uk
A canard that won't die

Ofc the highest earners pay more income tax than low earners because THEY HAVE MUCH HIGHER INCOMES

The % changes when all taxes are considered

The fixation on the top 1% share of income tax is "at best disingenuous"
@jdportes.bsky.social

@mrjamesob.bsky.social @lbc.co.uk
October 24, 2025 at 9:19 AM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
One could perhaps call this... two party politics?
Aggregate Result of the 139 Council By-Elections (for 142 Seats) since the 2025 Local Elections:

RFM: 49 (+42)
LDM: 43 (+16)
CON: 15 (-16)
LAB: 13 (-33)
GRN: 11 (+2)
Ind: 6 (-4)
Local: 3 (-5)
SNP: 1 (-1)
PLC: 1 (=)

Explore: electionmaps.uk/byelections-...
October 24, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
Vladimir Putin receives the result of the Caerphilly by-election.
October 24, 2025 at 8:33 AM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
I prefer Ed's response to that of Labour.
October 20, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
But how is this possible?

Trump said he brought peace to the Middle East.

For days everyone on the BBC, LBC and other right wing media have been accusing those who said it was nonsense to claim, so soon, that the war was over of being foolish haters with Trump derangement syndrome.

So predictable
🔊 Israel launches fresh strikes on Gaza as ceasefire violations spark blame from both sides. Hear the latest on the Reuters World News podcast reuters.sng.link/Eng86/0ep8/r...
October 19, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
How austerity hit young people.

In the decade after 2010 councils’ funding for youth services in England and Wales suffered a real-terms cut of 70%.

By 2023, 1,200 publicly run youth centres closed.

Young people abandoned to fund tax cuts for corporations the rich.
Britain's youth clubs have been quietly decimated. What's most revealing is that few seem to care | John Harris
These vital spaces have been the first targets of cuts in a nation that favours age over youth – despite being the remedy for blights such as social division, polarisation and loneliness, says Guardia...
www.theguardian.com
October 13, 2025 at 6:33 AM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
Farage claims Nathan Gill was a "bad apple".

So you can visualise his relationship with other leading figures in Reform as something like this.
October 12, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Reposted by Matthew Martin
It’s interesting that many prominent Your Party representatives talk confidently about party policy despite the party currently having none, as policy is meant to be decided by members; it’s at best a naive assumption that everybody agrees with them and at worst an outright lie.
October 13, 2025 at 12:06 AM