A clear, undisguised territorial claim against a NATO ally, and should be treated as such.
MILLER: Greenland should be part of the US. By what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? The US is the power of NATO
T: So force is on the table?
M: Nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over future of Greenland
A clear, undisguised territorial claim against a NATO ally, and should be treated as such.
Was ein Fehler! Unser loyaler Verbündeter Dänemark & die Menschen in Grönland werden bedroht, aber fast ein Jahr lang feiges Schweigen, das überall laut gehört wird.
Only Denmark and Greenland have the right to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland. Sweden fully stands up for our neighboring country.
Was ein Fehler! Unser loyaler Verbündeter Dänemark & die Menschen in Grönland werden bedroht, aber fast ein Jahr lang feiges Schweigen, das überall laut gehört wird.
»... Die rechtliche Einordnung des US-Einsatzes ist komplex. Dazu nehmen wir uns Zeit. Grundsätzlich müssen im Umgang zwischen Staaten die Prinzipien des Völkerrechts gelten.
This is not a problem just for Venezuela.
This is not a problem just for Venezuela.
Which means it’s now the US administration’s position that US courts can hold foreign presidents, but not the US president, accountable for crimes.
Which means it’s now the US administration’s position that US courts can hold foreign presidents, but not the US president, accountable for crimes.
Democracy = barely
Laws = Don't apply to rich
Constitution = words on paper
Equal rights = BS
Work hard = min wage slavery
Voting = not in red states
Security = pipe dream
Health care = predatory
It'll never happen here = happening here now
Democracy = barely
Laws = Don't apply to rich
Constitution = words on paper
Equal rights = BS
Work hard = min wage slavery
Voting = not in red states
Security = pipe dream
Health care = predatory
It'll never happen here = happening here now