David C.W. Parker
@phddcwp.bsky.social
230 followers 220 following 120 posts
Visiting Assistant Professor at UW-Platteville. Professor and Department Head Emeritus at Montana State University. Legislatures, Parliaments, American and British Politics. IU/UW alum. Anglophile. Red Sox. Madison, WI. Book Project: The Seditionists
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
phddcwp.bsky.social
This is similar to a policy in the Montana University System, which does not allow the naming of buildings after elected officials currently serving. The system chose to ignore said policy when naming a building after the sitting Governor donated $50 million, creating a massive conflict of interest.
phddcwp.bsky.social
There's a good reason for this law: It could be construed as a partisan favoritism or a possible campaign donation for someone who could still run for an office (JQ Adams, for example, later served in Congress). (1/2)
washingtonpost.com
The U.S. Treasury shared a proposal to mint $1 Trump coins to mark America’s 250th anniversary.

But U.S. code says only deceased individuals may appear on U.S. currency, a tradition dating back to efforts to break from monarchical rule. https://wapo.st/4pWsyL3
phddcwp.bsky.social
So much stupidity. Perhaps we should aid the whaling industry that has been under sustained assault from the oil industry.
Reposted by David C.W. Parker
kairyssdal.bsky.social
About this Florida vaccine story:

When they were little - 1 yr and 3 1/2 - my two older boys, who’d had all their shots, got whooping cough.

We asked their pediatrician what would’ve happened if they hadn’t been vaccinated.

“Oh, they’d have died.”
phddcwp.bsky.social
It’s time to dump some coffee in Boston Harbor ya’ll.
phddcwp.bsky.social
So much ignorance and self inflicted harm.
Reposted by David C.W. Parker
jonathanbernstein.bsky.social
But that's not all! During Trump's presidency, he took credit for a vaccine to end the pandemic, and Democrats...urged everyone to take it!

...which so upset "conservatives" that they not only turned against that vaccine, but against vaccines in general.
keptsimple.bsky.social
it's wild to post this when a more realistic version of it actually happened and it was conservatives who refused the treatment
I am now fully convinced, like never before, that if President Trump somehow cured cancer...

...that Democrats would protest in favor of cancer in the streets
Reposted by David C.W. Parker
justinwolfers.bsky.social
One of these is not like the others and it represents a dangerous new expansion in Trump's tariff adventures, meddling in internal criminal matters in other countries.
Reposted by David C.W. Parker
Reposted by David C.W. Parker
adambonica.bsky.social
The "unitary executive theory" is a fancy name for a strategy used by authoritarians worldwide, rebranded for the US. It’s a legal blueprint for a power grab, and my new article explains how it turns the law itself into a tool for undermining democracy:
How to Dismantle a Democracy, Legally
The unitary executive theory is a masterclass in autocratic legalism.
open.substack.com
phddcwp.bsky.social
Be prepared to be called partisan.
phddcwp.bsky.social
This is a nightmare. Who the hell taught these jokers Intro to American Politics? Congress is supposed to be the powerful branch—not the Executive.
adambonica.bsky.social
The Supreme Court’s “shadow docket” has cast very different shadows depending on which party holds the White House.

When lower courts blocked Trump admin policies, SCOTUS intervened on an emergency basis to lift those orders in 77% of cases.

For the Biden administration, that number was 0%.
Infographic titled “One Court, Two Standards” compares how the Supreme Court used emergency powers to rule on lower-court injunctions against the Biden and Trump administrations. Two panels show:
	•	Biden Administration: Lower courts blocked policies in 21 cases. All 21 cases are represented by red squares, indicating that 0% of injunctions/TROs were lifted by SCOTUS.
	•	Trump Administration: Lower courts blocked policies in 86 cases. 66 green squares and 20 red squares show that 77% of injunctions/TROs were lifted by SCOTUS.

Key takeaway box below reads:
“Using its ‘shadow docket,’ the Supreme Court granted emergency relief to lift 77% of lower-court injunctions against the Trump administration. It lifted 0% of those against the Biden administration.”

Sources and notes below include: CourtListener data through July 7, 2025; analysis by Adam Bonica.
phddcwp.bsky.social
I do have a 3.5 drive that could read these…someplace….
phddcwp.bsky.social
@leahlitman.bsky.social Reading Lawless now. It is totally inaccurate to call Ginsburg a moderate Justice. She anchored the left wing on the Court.
Reposted by David C.W. Parker
donmoyn.bsky.social
*Biden tries to forgive student loans*
SCOTUS: Whoa there, that is, uh, a major question. Which means you can't do it.

*Trump revokes part of the constitution*
SCOTUS: Obviously, we got to give the President the benefit of the doubt on this one.
phddcwp.bsky.social
I think it is time for the lower courts to ignore the Supreme Court.
Reposted by David C.W. Parker
adambonica.bsky.social
SCOTUS just stripped judges' power to stop unconstitutional orders nationwide in a move KBJ calls "an existential threat to the rule of law"

The Court has chosen a side, and it isn't the rule of law. Lower courts can't protect the Constitution because the Supreme Court won't let them.
passage
phddcwp.bsky.social
Well, Zoey got elected in the bluest house district in the state, so I’d take the “I got elected with 80% in a red state” a little less seriously.
phddcwp.bsky.social
Was following this as I heard about it on Westminster Hour. I know that it was a free vote—I wonder how it will fare in Lords.