Prof P (they/he)
@profka.bsky.social
Professor, polytheist, pronoun user. Trans lives matter 🏳️⚧️ Queer Lives matter 🏳️🌈 Women's rights matter ♀️ Black lives matter 🖤 Free 🇵🇸! Not up for debate.
Nothing posted, interacted with, or shared here is representative of my employer (Obviously 🙄)
Nothing posted, interacted with, or shared here is representative of my employer (Obviously 🙄)
Hey, @merriam-webster.com, with the Pantone announcement of White™️ being the color of the year... Could we maybe get "critical thinking" or "timeliness" or "context" as the word of the year? Maybe "reading the room"? Anything?? 🤦♀️
December 5, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Hey, @merriam-webster.com, with the Pantone announcement of White™️ being the color of the year... Could we maybe get "critical thinking" or "timeliness" or "context" as the word of the year? Maybe "reading the room"? Anything?? 🤦♀️
Reposted by Prof P (they/he)
The message is: crowd large.
Many politicians, administrators, and business leaders, in bowing to Trump, have drawn confidence and comfort from the perceived vibe shift.
Events like this puncture that delusion.
Many politicians, administrators, and business leaders, in bowing to Trump, have drawn confidence and comfort from the perceived vibe shift.
Events like this puncture that delusion.
You can stop asking where the mass opposition is. It's everywhere.
People poured out to protest not only what Trump has done—and what they fear he will do next.
www.motherjones.com
April 5, 2025 at 11:37 PM
The message is: crowd large.
Many politicians, administrators, and business leaders, in bowing to Trump, have drawn confidence and comfort from the perceived vibe shift.
Events like this puncture that delusion.
Many politicians, administrators, and business leaders, in bowing to Trump, have drawn confidence and comfort from the perceived vibe shift.
Events like this puncture that delusion.
A (facetious) thought experiment:
If you eliminate all mention of a historically marginalized group (or three) from your official communications, services, and presence on a campus, then can you really be considered to be serving "all" students? Why or Why not? #justcomplyinginadvancethings
If you eliminate all mention of a historically marginalized group (or three) from your official communications, services, and presence on a campus, then can you really be considered to be serving "all" students? Why or Why not? #justcomplyinginadvancethings
March 6, 2025 at 3:49 PM
A (facetious) thought experiment:
If you eliminate all mention of a historically marginalized group (or three) from your official communications, services, and presence on a campus, then can you really be considered to be serving "all" students? Why or Why not? #justcomplyinginadvancethings
If you eliminate all mention of a historically marginalized group (or three) from your official communications, services, and presence on a campus, then can you really be considered to be serving "all" students? Why or Why not? #justcomplyinginadvancethings
Reposted by Prof P (they/he)
Let’s be clear: This is the end result of 30 years of conservative thought. Small government, free markets, blah blah, all of it ended with this: the indiscriminate firing of the scientists who predict the fucking weather.
Their goal is to literally drag us back into the dark ages.
Their goal is to literally drag us back into the dark ages.
All probationary federal employees at NOAA’s EMC that’s responsible for keeping all US weather model systems running have been fired with 1 hours notice. And that includes me and colleagues. We will not go quietly because we care about the NOAA mission to protect the public.
February 28, 2025 at 8:05 AM
Let’s be clear: This is the end result of 30 years of conservative thought. Small government, free markets, blah blah, all of it ended with this: the indiscriminate firing of the scientists who predict the fucking weather.
Their goal is to literally drag us back into the dark ages.
Their goal is to literally drag us back into the dark ages.
Reposted by Prof P (they/he)
US Copyright Office: generative AI art requires ‘human authorship’ for protection
US Copyright Office: generative AI art requires ‘human authorship’ for protection
Human effort is required, but the bar is ‘extremely low’
buff.ly
January 30, 2025 at 8:10 PM
US Copyright Office: generative AI art requires ‘human authorship’ for protection
Reposted by Prof P (they/he)
you ever seen a more relatable headline
November 13, 2024 at 2:25 AM
you ever seen a more relatable headline
Just so we're immediately clear.
November 11, 2024 at 2:33 PM
Just so we're immediately clear.
Reposted by Prof P (they/he)
Reposted by Prof P (they/he)
Use you library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
November 10, 2024 at 4:05 PM
Use you library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library
Use your library