taylor
banner
pyropylon.bsky.social
taylor
@pyropylon.bsky.social
est. 1998 | they/them | 🇨🇦
flaming traffic cone of the millennium
genderqueer butch with the ‘tism or whatever
and falun gong’s propaganda rags technically don’t count as reputable sources although it doesn’t mean that reputable sources won’t report on it like it is. the media can be a mess.

en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...
Wikipedia:EPOCHTIMES - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
March 28, 2025 at 6:43 PM
eh i probably shouldn’t have said rigorous, it’s still wikipedia. low quality stuff has slipped through the cracks.

regardless, the only reason those articles exist is because enough reputable news sources and public figures published work on the topic, even if it’s propaganda.
March 28, 2025 at 6:28 PM
i consider myself to be detrans-ish, my gender shifted back towards my AGAB but other than stopping HRT and changing my name back, i still live as a trans man in most situations as I don’t really want to reverse the effects of T (hair removal, voice training) or dress fem
March 12, 2025 at 11:40 PM
Reposted by taylor
Grek Pak has a few Starter Packs that may apply:

bsky.app/starter-pack...

And bsky.app/starter-pack...
March 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Reposted by taylor
Here's the full essay: tinyurl.com/5ey9m9xp
Detrans/Uncis (Part 2)
On the place of detransitioners within sex/gender, and what that entails.
tinyurl.com
March 12, 2025 at 7:12 PM
with that article in particular, it’s just summarizing the report and how/why it came together, one can edit the article to address more of the complaints about it if you have reliable refs (from reputable news agencies, govt agencies etc).
March 12, 2025 at 2:21 PM
I wasn’t trying to prove anyone wrong, i was just answering the question to make it clear that i do recognize that you cant take an article at face value but you can probably trust a highly rated article more than others.
March 12, 2025 at 2:16 PM
the only detrans ppl that matter are the ones they can use to push their agenda. not the ones who still associate with the trans community, the ones who are still obnoxiously queer or who reverse their social/medical transition but identify as nonbinary, the ones who are progressive etc…
March 12, 2025 at 12:52 AM
oh god i remember when it was made, the russians kept trying to unsuccessfully take this one airport like 12 times and got destroyed each time, and they did drop a bunch of VDV troops in the Black Sea. there were so many memes.
March 11, 2025 at 11:13 PM
so much for states rights lol
March 11, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Reposted by taylor
Giving the same sentence the Boston marathon guy got to a dude that shat on a cybertruck is so fucking funny.

Fascism, but make it incredibly more stupid and whiner.
March 11, 2025 at 8:03 PM
source: my autism brain decided that editing wikipedia was gonna be it’s new hyperfixation a few months ago
March 11, 2025 at 7:17 PM
a lot of publicly available discussions and eval histories that can help with determining whether or not to trust the article’s content or the editors who contributed to it. (4 i think, gah i hate char limits)
March 11, 2025 at 6:42 PM
if you click “learn more about this page” or whatever it is on the desktop version, there are links to various evals the article had and like 9 pages of archived talk page discussions. there’s no reliability guarantee but high rated articles on controversial subjects tend to have (3)
March 11, 2025 at 6:27 PM
check the article’s talk page for discussion and evaluation archives to get a good idea of how editors were approaching it and if concerns were brought up and addressed (or not). this article’s talk page was pretty busy prior to 2015 (2)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ki...
Talk:Kilgour–Matas report - Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kilgour–Matas_report
March 11, 2025 at 6:21 PM
people can and have requested reevaluations of featured and good articles, there’s no guarantee that a good article will stay good. It has been 10 years since the GA designation so it’s best to look through the edit history since, and (1)
March 11, 2025 at 6:15 PM
obviously take any wikipedia article with a grain of salt due to the nature of the project, but there are internal processes of evaluating the quality of articles and sources, and ways to tell what articles are considered reliable by the editor/wikipedian community (which is pretty diverse).
March 11, 2025 at 4:29 PM
yeah the kilgore report article is GA class so it had to go through a pretty rigorous peer and source review process at some point
March 11, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Reposted by taylor
Meet Abigaïl, a volunteer from Benin who has made over 9,000 contributions across Wikimedia projects – including creating 270 new articles on French Wikipedia. She is driven by the role that gender and language diversity play in improving the quality and relevance of articles. (2/4)
March 11, 2025 at 2:17 PM
i spelled antisemitic wrong oof
March 11, 2025 at 12:27 AM