The Bureau of Investigative Journalism has written an extended piece on Carter-Ruck criticising them for “an increasingly aggressive strategy targeting one London officer” who was investigating what has been described elsewhere as a Ponzi scheme.  I quote liberally here from that piece, which I am sure will be of interest to many lawyerwatch readers, to try and explain the key elements of the story.

Partial refund to be issued after several errors were found in a report into a department’s compliance framework

Morrison Foerster has agreed to pay damages to the Good Law Project and the trans man it supported in a discrimination claim against the US law firm’s London office.

Screenshot from Tax Policy Associates. Secrecy in professional regulation is starting to become the focus of more attention. Two cases this week throw that into sharp relief. One is the story of Robin Makin, which appears to be ongoing, with practice limitations imposed already, but with an allegation of vexatious private prosecution apparently in train. The journalist, Charlie Moloney, says…