What's going on with charity shop prices! Why so expensive! Boo
October 17, 2025 at 4:24 PM
What's going on with charity shop prices! Why so expensive! Boo
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
In the 8 years between 2017 and 2024, The Mail, Telegraph, Guardian, Observer, Mirror, Express, and Star have printed a total of 10, 430 articles about trans people.
Ten thousand, four hundred and thirty.
Ten thousand, four hundred and thirty.
May 30, 2025 at 1:15 PM
In the 8 years between 2017 and 2024, The Mail, Telegraph, Guardian, Observer, Mirror, Express, and Star have printed a total of 10, 430 articles about trans people.
Ten thousand, four hundred and thirty.
Ten thousand, four hundred and thirty.
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
Trans people have been excluded from every single step. From Cass. From the Supreme Court. From the EHRC. From politics. From the media. And still, trans people will be blamed when this explodes in everyone's faces despite trans people warning, for years, that this is what would happen.
May 21, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Trans people have been excluded from every single step. From Cass. From the Supreme Court. From the EHRC. From politics. From the media. And still, trans people will be blamed when this explodes in everyone's faces despite trans people warning, for years, that this is what would happen.
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
the member of staff who needs to check if u have a penis but not in a Rude Manner
May 21, 2025 at 11:35 AM
the member of staff who needs to check if u have a penis but not in a Rude Manner
Something happened at the SC. Why did they exclude trans voices? Why was the judgment written using anti trans terminology? Why was a homophobic judge in charge? Why did they not consider the equality act? Why did the EHRC come out swinging so hard as soon as the judgment was announced? Sus
The EHRC held a party where Baroness Falkner literally hugged all the big trans hate groups (who the EHRC has been in cahoots with). We need a public inquiry into all of these shenanigans. It’s pure corruption at the highest level. As was the UKSC.
May 21, 2025 at 8:34 AM
Something happened at the SC. Why did they exclude trans voices? Why was the judgment written using anti trans terminology? Why was a homophobic judge in charge? Why did they not consider the equality act? Why did the EHRC come out swinging so hard as soon as the judgment was announced? Sus
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
Democrats just flipped the Omaha mayor's office with ads like this. The right-wing obsession with genitals is starting to backfire.
May 14, 2025 at 4:24 AM
Democrats just flipped the Omaha mayor's office with ads like this. The right-wing obsession with genitals is starting to backfire.
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
No mention of trans people and our rights. No mention of the Supreme Court case. No mention of the Conversion Therapy Ban. What happened to Stonewall, man. They weren't this weak even a few years ago
🌍 The ILGA-Europe Rainbow Map ranks the legal and policy landscape for #LGBTQ+ people across Europe.
🚨 The latest rankings today shows the UK has reached an all-time low position of 22 out of 49.
This should be a wake-up call for the British government.
Read our statement ▶️ bit.ly/3S0iuB3
🚨 The latest rankings today shows the UK has reached an all-time low position of 22 out of 49.
This should be a wake-up call for the British government.
Read our statement ▶️ bit.ly/3S0iuB3
Stonewall responds to the UK dropping six places in this year's ILGA…
The ILGA-Europe Rainbow Map ranks the legal and policy landscape for LGBTQ+ people across Europe. Today it has been announced that he UK has reached an…
bit.ly
May 14, 2025 at 10:18 AM
No mention of trans people and our rights. No mention of the Supreme Court case. No mention of the Conversion Therapy Ban. What happened to Stonewall, man. They weren't this weak even a few years ago
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
Small but important comment: let's call these 'trans segregation' policies at every possible opportunity. That phrase has the power to cut through.
As an alumnus of the University of Warwick, I have written to ask for more information on their new trans segregation policy, which was uploaded and then removed from their website. Thanks to @whatthetrans.com and @katymontgomerie.com for raising awareness of this.
May 13, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Small but important comment: let's call these 'trans segregation' policies at every possible opportunity. That phrase has the power to cut through.
It's like throwing meat to their caged zombies
There have been anti-trans 8 articles so far this week in the papers I monitor. 1 in the Mail, 2 in the Times. 5 in the Telegraph.
In two days.
They printed 4 of them today.
In two days.
They printed 4 of them today.
May 13, 2025 at 10:14 AM
It's like throwing meat to their caged zombies
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
It's weird that the US government released actual UFO footage and nobody bats an eye, and yet the government lose their shit over what is, was or may be between my legs.
My genitals are more fearsome than extra terrestrials. Cool. Cool.
My genitals are more fearsome than extra terrestrials. Cool. Cool.
May 12, 2025 at 11:55 AM
It's weird that the US government released actual UFO footage and nobody bats an eye, and yet the government lose their shit over what is, was or may be between my legs.
My genitals are more fearsome than extra terrestrials. Cool. Cool.
My genitals are more fearsome than extra terrestrials. Cool. Cool.
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
The problems in our society are not caused by migrants or refugees.
They are caused by an economic system rigged in favour of corporations and billionaires.
If the government wanted to improve people’s lives, it would tax the rich and build an economy that works for us all.
They are caused by an economic system rigged in favour of corporations and billionaires.
If the government wanted to improve people’s lives, it would tax the rich and build an economy that works for us all.
May 12, 2025 at 8:25 AM
The problems in our society are not caused by migrants or refugees.
They are caused by an economic system rigged in favour of corporations and billionaires.
If the government wanted to improve people’s lives, it would tax the rich and build an economy that works for us all.
They are caused by an economic system rigged in favour of corporations and billionaires.
If the government wanted to improve people’s lives, it would tax the rich and build an economy that works for us all.
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
Trans Kids Deserve Better has just covered the front of the NHS England with bloody handprints with the words "release the trans suicides report"
May 11, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Trans Kids Deserve Better has just covered the front of the NHS England with bloody handprints with the words "release the trans suicides report"
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
when you first come out you wonder who all these trans rights activists that the media is always talking about are. then after a while you realise they're talking about you.
May 9, 2025 at 10:34 PM
when you first come out you wonder who all these trans rights activists that the media is always talking about are. then after a while you realise they're talking about you.
Well said!
To be trans is to gamble everything about oneself on a hope of the possibility of freedom.
It is that capacity for hope that makes so many of us creative.
It is also what make people envy and hate us and makes established systems want to destroy us.
To hope is to want something better.
It is that capacity for hope that makes so many of us creative.
It is also what make people envy and hate us and makes established systems want to destroy us.
To hope is to want something better.
May 9, 2025 at 11:02 AM
Well said!
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
The EHRC shocked a UN discrimination expert by stating what the intent behind using "biological sex" is back in 2023
Of course they didn't define it - just as the Supreme Court didn't - because it is meaningless other than as a "get out of jail free" card for discriminating against trans people
Of course they didn't define it - just as the Supreme Court didn't - because it is meaningless other than as a "get out of jail free" card for discriminating against trans people
![21. The Independent Expert was particularly alarmed by a 3 April 2023 letter from the Equalities and
Human Rights Commission (EHRC) to the Minister for Equalities, by which it advised that defining the
term “sex” as “biological sex” under the Equality Act would “bring greater legal clarity” to the
implementation of the Act. In contrast, the Scotland Committee of the EHRC had itself on 28 February
2023 expressed concerns it did “not consider sufficient evidence has been presented to justify amending
the definition of legal sex in the EqA [Equality Act] 2010 to biological sex at this time”, noting that “the
Board should consider the risk to our perceived political independence if we are perceived to be aligning
with Government in the absence of robust evidence. This is a potential existential risk that such a
perception could risk the Commission’s existence going forward.” Additionally, the committee indicated
there had been no clear demonstration of a legal need or legitimate aim, even though “changing the
definition of sex could diminish trans people’s rights; for example, legal colleagues advised that, if the
proposed change were implemented, obtaining a Gender Recognition Certificate would no longer change
a person’s sex in discrimination law. The Committee considered the Commission should be advancing the
rights of minorities and not potentially diminishing rights for some groups.”
22. In a meeting with the EHRC on 4 May 2023, the Independent Expert was shocked to hear that the
EHRC offered that advice without itself having any definition of ‘biological sex’; UK law provides no
such definition either. The EHRC however specifically conceded that, in the context of the letter, the
intended meaning of the term “biological sex” is to define women as “women who are not trans.” As one](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:pipsd3tlfy2fvzrg6rjedqgn/bafkreihs73eod2rmi3otdukcbhzlzhfy4hmysr4vc3qdkvilw5ugbjyuze@jpeg)
May 8, 2025 at 12:57 PM
The EHRC shocked a UN discrimination expert by stating what the intent behind using "biological sex" is back in 2023
Of course they didn't define it - just as the Supreme Court didn't - because it is meaningless other than as a "get out of jail free" card for discriminating against trans people
Of course they didn't define it - just as the Supreme Court didn't - because it is meaningless other than as a "get out of jail free" card for discriminating against trans people
I remember
hey remember when jd vance told labour they had to strip trans ppl of our civil rights if the uk wanted a trade deal and then less than a week later we were stripped of our civil rights?
May 8, 2025 at 11:26 AM
I remember
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
In an absolutely devastating ruling, the Supreme Court has allowed the transgender military ban to go into effect.
This is shocking - the ban explicitly called transgender people dishonorable for being transgender. It is as clear as day soaked in animus.
www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
This is shocking - the ban explicitly called transgender people dishonorable for being transgender. It is as clear as day soaked in animus.
www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
May 6, 2025 at 6:28 PM
In an absolutely devastating ruling, the Supreme Court has allowed the transgender military ban to go into effect.
This is shocking - the ban explicitly called transgender people dishonorable for being transgender. It is as clear as day soaked in animus.
www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
This is shocking - the ban explicitly called transgender people dishonorable for being transgender. It is as clear as day soaked in animus.
www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
It's as if social media is being blamed for "making her trans" instead of focusing on someone being murdered for being trans.
There’s something really disturbing to me about the way the media, and indeed her own mother, continue to talk about Brianna Ghey - a constant focus on publicising her mental health, as if she’d committed suicide, and never focusing on the transphobia that actually led to her horrific murder.
May 4, 2025 at 4:52 PM
It's as if social media is being blamed for "making her trans" instead of focusing on someone being murdered for being trans.
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
This is the UKSC Judge who stripped trans people of legal recognition - Lord Patrick Hodge.
In 2011, he headed a Church of Scotland commission to look at gay relationships. The report is full of stuff saying God wouldn’t approve - and even asks for ‘biological proof’ of gay.
In 2011, he headed a Church of Scotland commission to look at gay relationships. The report is full of stuff saying God wouldn’t approve - and even asks for ‘biological proof’ of gay.
May 4, 2025 at 12:53 PM
This is the UKSC Judge who stripped trans people of legal recognition - Lord Patrick Hodge.
In 2011, he headed a Church of Scotland commission to look at gay relationships. The report is full of stuff saying God wouldn’t approve - and even asks for ‘biological proof’ of gay.
In 2011, he headed a Church of Scotland commission to look at gay relationships. The report is full of stuff saying God wouldn’t approve - and even asks for ‘biological proof’ of gay.
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
What Treasury is doing is making a dishonest political case that we should prioritise the interests of the owners of water companies over those of taxpayers, customers and the environment.
Because Labour has been captured by money. Different glove puppet; same hand. 2/2
Because Labour has been captured by money. Different glove puppet; same hand. 2/2
May 4, 2025 at 6:16 AM
What Treasury is doing is making a dishonest political case that we should prioritise the interests of the owners of water companies over those of taxpayers, customers and the environment.
Because Labour has been captured by money. Different glove puppet; same hand. 2/2
Because Labour has been captured by money. Different glove puppet; same hand. 2/2
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
May 2, 2025 at 1:46 PM
Anyone know what they said?
This is such an absolutely useless and weak statement. What happened to Stonewall, they seem to have just given up on trans people
May 2, 2025 at 9:39 AM
Anyone know what they said?
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
Absolutely insane. Uneblieveable. "Sex Matters", one of the hate groups responsible for removing trans people's rights via the Supreme Court are arguing that trans people shouldn't be allowed to transition because they don't have rights and not having rights is bad. Fucking hell
I'm not kidding. That's the fucking argument. "Kids will be harmed by the policy we rammed through once they grow up, so do conversion therapy on them."
May 1, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Absolutely insane. Uneblieveable. "Sex Matters", one of the hate groups responsible for removing trans people's rights via the Supreme Court are arguing that trans people shouldn't be allowed to transition because they don't have rights and not having rights is bad. Fucking hell
Reposted by Screaming in the Wind
Lol. They released their 400 page US version of the Cass Review and refused to even name who the authors were. It's a glorified book report.
Anyway, this is out now y'all. I'll be looking it over today.
opa.hhs.gov/sites/defaul...
Anyway, this is out now y'all. I'll be looking it over today.
opa.hhs.gov/sites/defaul...
May 1, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Lol. They released their 400 page US version of the Cass Review and refused to even name who the authors were. It's a glorified book report.
Anyway, this is out now y'all. I'll be looking it over today.
opa.hhs.gov/sites/defaul...
Anyway, this is out now y'all. I'll be looking it over today.
opa.hhs.gov/sites/defaul...