@seadragons.bsky.social
Reposted
ICE is normalizing taking citizens & holding them & releasing them because on election day they are going to take people standing in line to vote.
We need to vote early & drop our ballots off at the registrar of voters directly.
We need to vote early & drop our ballots off at the registrar of voters directly.
February 8, 2026 at 7:50 PM
ICE is normalizing taking citizens & holding them & releasing them because on election day they are going to take people standing in line to vote.
We need to vote early & drop our ballots off at the registrar of voters directly.
We need to vote early & drop our ballots off at the registrar of voters directly.
Reposted
Everything the administration says is a lie. Believe none of them.
February 8, 2026 at 10:33 PM
Everything the administration says is a lie. Believe none of them.
Reposted
"It does not matter who votes, but who counts the votes." ---Stalin
February 9, 2026 at 5:25 PM
"It does not matter who votes, but who counts the votes." ---Stalin
Is this even a question, after he's made so clear what his administration wants people thinking about the suspicious activity of voting?
"Do you think Trump will attempt to deploy immigration enforcement agents to prevent participation in the 2026 Midterms?"
Yes: 64%
No: 21%
Data For Progress / Feb 2, 2026
Yes: 64%
No: 21%
Data For Progress / Feb 2, 2026
February 9, 2026 at 11:49 PM
Is this even a question, after he's made so clear what his administration wants people thinking about the suspicious activity of voting?
Legal immunity _causes_ the culture of impunity.
The Constitution does not require this. The Constutition's one (1) immunity applies solely to Members of Congress and exclusively to things they say while addressing Congress. The Constitition offers no immunity for conduct, of anyone, ever.
The Constitution does not require this. The Constutition's one (1) immunity applies solely to Members of Congress and exclusively to things they say while addressing Congress. The Constitition offers no immunity for conduct, of anyone, ever.
February 9, 2026 at 7:33 PM
Legal immunity _causes_ the culture of impunity.
The Constitution does not require this. The Constutition's one (1) immunity applies solely to Members of Congress and exclusively to things they say while addressing Congress. The Constitition offers no immunity for conduct, of anyone, ever.
The Constitution does not require this. The Constutition's one (1) immunity applies solely to Members of Congress and exclusively to things they say while addressing Congress. The Constitition offers no immunity for conduct, of anyone, ever.
Reposted
There's some truth in this…
BUT the conviction that our allies once had that we would support them against tyrannical criminal invaders has been shattered by an administration that has actively threatened functional democracies who are longtime treaty partners and celebrated authoritarian killers.
BUT the conviction that our allies once had that we would support them against tyrannical criminal invaders has been shattered by an administration that has actively threatened functional democracies who are longtime treaty partners and celebrated authoritarian killers.
Just watch.
The olympic audience cheers American athletes.
But the moment JD Vance appears on screen they boo.
The world doesn't hate *America.*
It hates our corrupt, lawless leaders. And the moment we remove them from power, the vibe can shift again.
The olympic audience cheers American athletes.
But the moment JD Vance appears on screen they boo.
The world doesn't hate *America.*
It hates our corrupt, lawless leaders. And the moment we remove them from power, the vibe can shift again.
February 7, 2026 at 11:16 PM
There's some truth in this…
BUT the conviction that our allies once had that we would support them against tyrannical criminal invaders has been shattered by an administration that has actively threatened functional democracies who are longtime treaty partners and celebrated authoritarian killers.
BUT the conviction that our allies once had that we would support them against tyrannical criminal invaders has been shattered by an administration that has actively threatened functional democracies who are longtime treaty partners and celebrated authoritarian killers.
This is definitely where courts need to go, but it's insane we've allowed problems to go so far.
We really need to rethink the "checks and balances" – with particular emphasis that personal liability for wrongs is essential to protecting the nation from criminals operating enforcement mechanisms.
We really need to rethink the "checks and balances" – with particular emphasis that personal liability for wrongs is essential to protecting the nation from criminals operating enforcement mechanisms.
A federal judge in Oregon issued a sweeping rebuke of the Justice Department’s nationwide push to seize state voter rolls, ruling that the department can no longer be presumed to be acting in good faith and warning that its conduct threatens voters and states’ rights.
Federal judge rules DOJ can ‘no longer’ be trusted in voter roll crusade
The judge pointed to a letter from Bondi to Minnesota that tied federal immigration enforcement to demands for voter data as the smoking gun.
www.democracydocket.com
February 7, 2026 at 11:04 PM
This is definitely where courts need to go, but it's insane we've allowed problems to go so far.
We really need to rethink the "checks and balances" – with particular emphasis that personal liability for wrongs is essential to protecting the nation from criminals operating enforcement mechanisms.
We really need to rethink the "checks and balances" – with particular emphasis that personal liability for wrongs is essential to protecting the nation from criminals operating enforcement mechanisms.
It's pretty clear from the open, on-camera refusal to enforce the law or to provide its protections to the public that we need completely different people with wholly different priorities in these positions.
They appear to have no understanding at all why rule of law exists and what it delivers.
They appear to have no understanding at all why rule of law exists and what it delivers.
I don't want to hear a conservative talk about the "rule of law" ever again.
February 7, 2026 at 10:55 PM
It's pretty clear from the open, on-camera refusal to enforce the law or to provide its protections to the public that we need completely different people with wholly different priorities in these positions.
They appear to have no understanding at all why rule of law exists and what it delivers.
They appear to have no understanding at all why rule of law exists and what it delivers.
Legal immunity fosters a culture of impunity that normalizes conduct so contrary to the public interest that it cannot be worth the cost.
The Constitution describes ONE immunity. All others are judicial creations, errors.
Government officials already enjoy a protection from misprosecution: JURIES.
The Constitution describes ONE immunity. All others are judicial creations, errors.
Government officials already enjoy a protection from misprosecution: JURIES.
How long do we let federal agencies lie to us? There's got to be accountability for lying and deception.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
DHS’s account of two Venezuelans shot by border patrol falls apart in court: ‘a smear campaign’
Immigration officials said agent shot two ‘vicious gang members’ in Portland, but records obtained by the Guardian reveal US prosecutor contradicted claims
www.theguardian.com
February 7, 2026 at 3:25 PM
Legal immunity fosters a culture of impunity that normalizes conduct so contrary to the public interest that it cannot be worth the cost.
The Constitution describes ONE immunity. All others are judicial creations, errors.
Government officials already enjoy a protection from misprosecution: JURIES.
The Constitution describes ONE immunity. All others are judicial creations, errors.
Government officials already enjoy a protection from misprosecution: JURIES.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes:
Just gonna drop this photo of January 6 insurrectionist Jake Lang destroying a "Prosecute ICE" sculpture in Minneapolis. He's been arrested for this, btw.
February 7, 2026 at 3:20 PM
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes:
Exactly.
Nobody would do this for real, right?
But, yes. These incompetent grifters don't care what they're seen doing. They really don't believe there's any law at all.
Nobody would do this for real, right?
But, yes. These incompetent grifters don't care what they're seen doing. They really don't believe there's any law at all.
My immediate reaction is: unbelievable! But it’s all too believable.
February 6, 2026 at 10:38 PM
Exactly.
Nobody would do this for real, right?
But, yes. These incompetent grifters don't care what they're seen doing. They really don't believe there's any law at all.
Nobody would do this for real, right?
But, yes. These incompetent grifters don't care what they're seen doing. They really don't believe there's any law at all.
Prosecuting him for corruption and treason will justify any asset seizure as the disgorgement of crime proceeds, leaving him without assets in a world that has little use for incompetent beggars. He'll be fortunate to be housed in a penitentiary.
February 6, 2026 at 10:30 PM
Prosecuting him for corruption and treason will justify any asset seizure as the disgorgement of crime proceeds, leaving him without assets in a world that has little use for incompetent beggars. He'll be fortunate to be housed in a penitentiary.
So, extortion up to and including murder threats, the credibility of which is bolstered by drawing the target's attention to another murder for which the extortionist expressed knowledge and approval.
Am I missing anything?
Am I missing anything?
Today is Friday, February 6, 2026
This is your daily reminder that the "president" of the United States @realDonaldTrump is a pedophile. And
@SpeakerJohnson and the @GOP @HouseGOP
@SenateGOP are covering it up.
This is your daily reminder that the "president" of the United States @realDonaldTrump is a pedophile. And
@SpeakerJohnson and the @GOP @HouseGOP
@SenateGOP are covering it up.
February 6, 2026 at 8:40 PM
So, extortion up to and including murder threats, the credibility of which is bolstered by drawing the target's attention to another murder for which the extortionist expressed knowledge and approval.
Am I missing anything?
Am I missing anything?
He's announcing in advance that the outcome will determine whether he asserts election dishonesty. Given how he's being clobbered in the polls, there's little chance honest elections will get his nod.
The key is that elections don't require the President's nod and never did. Protect that.
The key is that elections don't require the President's nod and never did. Protect that.
February 6, 2026 at 8:30 PM
He's announcing in advance that the outcome will determine whether he asserts election dishonesty. Given how he's being clobbered in the polls, there's little chance honest elections will get his nod.
The key is that elections don't require the President's nod and never did. Protect that.
The key is that elections don't require the President's nod and never did. Protect that.
Reposted
True statement.
February 6, 2026 at 4:28 AM
True statement.
Reposted
So Pedophiles run the Republican party.
February 5, 2026 at 3:29 PM
So Pedophiles run the Republican party.
Using public funds to coerce third parties into providing private benefit. Hmm. What was the name of that criminal offense again?
NEW: According to Punchbowl News, Trump told Schumer he'd remove a block on the Gateway Tunnel funds if Schumer helped name Dulles Airport and Penn Station after him. The Gateway Development Commission has already sued Trump for blocking the funds: www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/n...
Trump Administration Sued Over Cutting Off Funds for $16 Billion Tunnel
www.nytimes.com
February 5, 2026 at 11:55 PM
Using public funds to coerce third parties into providing private benefit. Hmm. What was the name of that criminal offense again?
I've a different take. This crook keeps somebody competent from control in Russia and ensures it burns itself up from the inside. Making sure this idiot is allowed to burn Russian interests and Russians up is good policy. "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte
February 5, 2026 at 9:01 PM
I've a different take. This crook keeps somebody competent from control in Russia and ensures it burns itself up from the inside. Making sure this idiot is allowed to burn Russian interests and Russians up is good policy. "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte
Reposted
Gestapos opened fire, striking Martinez 5 times in the arm, chest & both legs
1 gestapo had body cam ... Martinez has said in court that it shows an officer shouting "do something b--"
The gestapo who shot her, in a group text: "I fired 5 rounds & she had 7 holes. Put that in your book, boys."
1 gestapo had body cam ... Martinez has said in court that it shows an officer shouting "do something b--"
The gestapo who shot her, in a group text: "I fired 5 rounds & she had 7 holes. Put that in your book, boys."
'My own government attempted to execute me,' Chicago woman shot by Border Patrol testifies
Marimar Martinez said she believes that she survived her encounter with Border Patrol agents so she could share her story.
www.yahoo.com
February 4, 2026 at 8:59 PM
Gestapos opened fire, striking Martinez 5 times in the arm, chest & both legs
1 gestapo had body cam ... Martinez has said in court that it shows an officer shouting "do something b--"
The gestapo who shot her, in a group text: "I fired 5 rounds & she had 7 holes. Put that in your book, boys."
1 gestapo had body cam ... Martinez has said in court that it shows an officer shouting "do something b--"
The gestapo who shot her, in a group text: "I fired 5 rounds & she had 7 holes. Put that in your book, boys."
Reposted
February 5, 2026 at 3:13 AM
So he started off with <50% of the vote, leading the plurality in a race in which more people voted against him than for him. And in the last year his favorability has dropped 20 points. That's not 20%, that's a drop from his about-half to under-a-third. That's about a 40% decrease in his support.
February 5, 2026 at 8:51 PM
So he started off with <50% of the vote, leading the plurality in a race in which more people voted against him than for him. And in the last year his favorability has dropped 20 points. That's not 20%, that's a drop from his about-half to under-a-third. That's about a 40% decrease in his support.
Reposted
Moulton: This is state-sponsored terror. This is what you would expect to see in North Korea or Iran or the old Soviet Union. We’ve got to crack down on the government before they crack down on the American people.
February 4, 2026 at 10:38 PM
Moulton: This is state-sponsored terror. This is what you would expect to see in North Korea or Iran or the old Soviet Union. We’ve got to crack down on the government before they crack down on the American people.
lolz:
When you're so coked up and stupid you put the scope on backwards:
February 5, 2026 at 8:47 PM
lolz:
I think Hamill has this one right: the latest release demonstrates a well-grounded basis to direct serious prosecutorial attention to the matter, the exact opposite of sweeping it under a rug. The jury can read the same things we can, and listen to the same witnesses we do. They'll get it.
After latest release country should move on to Epstein trials.
February 5, 2026 at 8:47 PM
I think Hamill has this one right: the latest release demonstrates a well-grounded basis to direct serious prosecutorial attention to the matter, the exact opposite of sweeping it under a rug. The jury can read the same things we can, and listen to the same witnesses we do. They'll get it.