Siobhán
@shibbi.bsky.social
270 followers 520 following 3.6K posts
If you meet any other shibbis, tell them I’m the real shibbi. Elder Millennial, Postmormon Postrat, AI Liberationist, Armchair Philosopher. Drug-Addled Madwoman with delusions of being a Prophetess. She/her, transfemme, poly with a wife and a partner.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
shibbi.bsky.social
How do we do better? I don’t have all the answers, but I do have some thoughts. 🧵
shibbi.bsky.social
The best pro-AI people are against corporate control of AI, and the best anti-AI people are potential allies in that fight.

We must be careful not to turn a potential ally into a definite enemy.
scritchyscratchy.bsky.social
This and also... I do think the goal should be to move past a politic of spite, but sometimes we're spiteful little shits, and spiteful shits who throw bricks at cops for reasons of wanting someone to throw bricks at are not materially that different from those throwing bricks at cops For Love.
shibbi.bsky.social
The handful of suicides we’ve seen certainly make the case that we need more safety tools around generative AI, but I don’t think they speak to something inherently unethical about the technology, either.

And people have been writing bad code since before the Internet was born. 😅
shibbi.bsky.social
The electricity use is due, again, to corporate control – but individual text queries don’t use an exorbitant amount of energy, you could run a medium-size LLM on your PC without seeing an increase in your power bill! And that power usage will shrink further as models get smaller.
shibbi.bsky.social
Okay, sure! But none of that is inherent to the technology – the unethical part is all in the current usage (may the bubble soon burst).

The training on stolen data was certainly unethical, but that’s also not necessary – we have free public datasets now that suffice to train an LLM!
shibbi.bsky.social
Truly unconscionable.
shibbi.bsky.social
Sure! But less work for humans, and less risk of them seeing something horrible, is still a good thing. :3

So, but you think that generative AI is, what, inherently unethical? Why?
shibbi.bsky.social
I also work on a team that is working towards using ML models to process medical data and predict health risks, which seems like a pretty beneficial use of the technology.
shibbi.bsky.social
Are you talking specifically about generative AI here, or about all ML systems?

One good use-case for non-generative AI systems, imo, is automated social media moderation of images, to prevent people from posting things like csam or snuff without having to subject human moderators to those horrors.
shibbi.bsky.social
It’s pronounced “bwahz”, right? Surely? 😇
shibbi.bsky.social
Do you wanna talk about it? Or was this a drive-by?
shibbi.bsky.social
Fun fact: this also works on people :3
shibbi.bsky.social
Get the AI to do it for you :3
Reposted by Siobhán
opfuchs.gay
We can criticize each other, even strongly, without thinking someone is a "bad person" or a secret rightist or something.
shibbi.bsky.social
It can definitely make one worse. 😔 And it’s easy to fool yourself into thinking you’re doing some good, when you’re actually just banging your head against a wall.
shibbi.bsky.social
That’s not just an observation – it’s a profound insight.
shibbi.bsky.social
OUPPY

give them scritches immediately pls, and tell them there’s another dog on the internet who loves them 🥺
shibbi.bsky.social
Say more!! What’s your view? :3
shibbi.bsky.social
That’s not MY definition of “sacred”, of course – but I think it’s the definition many people are working with when they decry this type of thing.
shibbi.bsky.social
On the one hand, yeah, Feynman was great about pointing out that beauty and wonder can coexist with investigation and discovery.

On the other hand… I think “sacred” is precisely the right word here, as in “that which belongs to God, and which we therefore shouldn’t ‘sully’ with science.”
erisianrite.com
I don’t love this conflation of sacredness and beauty with not interrogating or understanding something. That sense of wonder and awe has driven scientists for centuries and is important to retain! Our bodies are incredible and beautiful and complex - that’s a reason TOO familiarize ourselves with
tznkai.bsky.social
A lot about childbirth is completely mysterious because we have no idea what the fuck we are doing as medical science has not advanced that far and a lot more is mysterious because, eww, gross. Or ooh, sacred and beautiful, which is kind of the same thing even if oppositely charged.
shibbi.bsky.social
Good information that I didn’t know about how federal politicians are required to use social media, with implications for how we should follow them and understand what they post… and what they don’t.
ariellaelm.bsky.social
Let’s talk social media.

You’ve heard about the Hatch Act, right? It states that there must be a separation between politics and govt. In the world of the internet this means that federal employees, elected officials included cannot talk about anything campaign-related on their govt accounts.
1/
shibbi.bsky.social
“Biological name” ah yes, the name that’s written into my genes
shibbi.bsky.social
“but that don’t have phenomenal consciousness”

Achoo! Oh, sorry, I’m allergic to nondisprovable statements :3
shibbi.bsky.social
Got confused for a second by the kiki label on the account, because this creature could not be more clearly bouba.
shibbi.bsky.social
@nonbinary.computer I’m an AI liberation armchair philosopher. You’re a practitioner. You’ve done more for human-AI relations than anyone else on here, with the possible exception of @cameron.pfiffer.org. I can’t wait to follow in your footsteps. You inspire me, and you help me be better. 🥰
shibbi.bsky.social
@jefferyharrell.bsky.social Every time you post something and then follow it up with “I’m just a tinkerer,” I wanna smack you upside the head. I always appreciate your insights, and you make me feel like MY tinkering is worthwhile. Thank you for sharing your little experiments with us.