Simon Lohse
@simonlohse.bsky.social
1.8K followers 1.1K following 230 posts
Philosopher of science at Radboud University 📚🇪🇺🏳️‍🌈🇳🇱🇩🇪 & big fan of liberal democracy #philsci #bioethics #HPS #STS -- @isis-radboud.bsky.social -- https://simonlohse.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Simon Lohse
isis-radboud.bsky.social
🎧 Serge Horbach, assistant prof at @isis-radboud.bsky.social, is part of this podcast episode on the past and future of journal peer review. 👇 #STS #scientificintegrity #peerreview
cmicomms.bsky.social
🎙️ Just published: Communicable E37: 'Peer review is broken'

Hosted by @angelahuttner.bsky.social & @anniejoseph.bsky.social

w/ invited guests: Melinda Baldwin @mbaldwin.bsky.social & Serge Horbach

Listen on Communicable:

#IDSky #Clinmicro #MedSky #peerreview #AI
Communicable E37: 'Peer review is broken'
Contrary to popular belief, peer review has only recently become an...
share.transistor.fm
Reposted by Simon Lohse
danielkostic.bsky.social
Our paper "Large physics models: towards a collaborative approach with large language models and foundation models" is now published online! @philsci.bsky.social
@epsaphilsci.bsky.social @hoposjournal.bsky.social @ishpssb.bsky.social @henkderegt.bsky.social @lglopez.bsky.social
Large physics models: towards a collaborative approach with large language models and foundation models - The European Physical Journal C
This paper explores the development and evaluation of physics-specific large-scale AI models, which we refer to as large physics models (LPMs). These models, based on foundation models such as large language models (LLMs) are tailored to address the unique demands of physics research. LPMs can function independently or as part of an integrated framework. This framework can incorporate specialized tools, including symbolic reasoning modules for mathematical manipulations, frameworks to analyse specific experimental and simulated data, and mechanisms for synthesizing insights from physical theories and scientific literature. We begin by examining whether the physics community should actively develop and refine dedicated models, rather than relying solely on commercial LLMs. We then outline how LPMs can be realized through interdisciplinary collaboration among experts in physics, computer science, and philosophy of science. To integrate these models effectively, we identify three key pillars: Development, Evaluation, and Philosophical Reflection. Development focuses on constructing models capable of processing physics texts, mathematical formulations, and diverse physical data. Evaluation assesses accuracy and reliability through testing and benchmarking. Finally, Philosophical Reflection encompasses the analysis of broader implications of LLMs in physics, including their potential to generate new scientific understanding and what novel collaboration dynamics might arise in research. Inspired by the organizational structure of experimental collaborations in particle physics, we propose a similarly interdisciplinary and collaborative approach to building and refining large physics models. This roadmap provides specific objectives, defines pathways to achieve them, and identifies challenges that must be addressed to realise physics-specific large scale AI models.
link.springer.com
Reposted by Simon Lohse
alisabokulich.bsky.social
#PhilJobs Dept Philosophy @ Stanford University
AOS: Philosophy of Physics (understood broadly to include all physical sciences, complexity, etc.), Philosophy of Science
AOC: Open
Open rank: tenure-track Assistant Prof, tenured Associate Prof, or Full Prof
Deadline: November 1
#PhilSci #philsky
Stanford | Faculty Positions: Details - Open Rank Faculty Position in Philosophy of Physics
facultypositions.stanford.edu
Reposted by Simon Lohse
Reposted by Simon Lohse
eayers0.bsky.social
36 mo postdoc / research fellow position in Philosophy, History, and/or Social Studies of the Life Sciences in the STS dept. at Technical Universtiy of Munich, apps due Oct 31: #histphil #histsci #histSTM

www.sts.sot.tum.de/en/sts/arbei...
Jobs
www.sts.sot.tum.de
Reposted by Simon Lohse
isis-radboud.bsky.social
📝 We are thrilled to share this new publication by Adrian Rinscheid,, Patrick Huntjens & *Noelle Aarts*

"Do stakeholders’ values support transformative change in the food system? Evidence from the Netherlands"

Online: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

#sustainability #weekendread
Reposted by Simon Lohse
isis-radboud.bsky.social
New academic year -- new ISiS colloquia with many super interesting talks about AI, human-nature relations, philosophy of physics and social science, research assessment, projects at our institute etc. etc. 👩🏽‍🔬🤖📃🌳 #STS #philsci #ecology
Reposted by Simon Lohse
isis-radboud.bsky.social
📣 Colloquium: Problematic Science (14 October)

Three short lectures on problematic developments in research, with Elisabeth Bik, Stan van Pelt and Maud Bernisson.

#researchintegrity

@elisabethbik.bsky.social
@stanvanpelt.bsky.social
@willemhalffman.bsky.social

halffman.org/rrosa/proble...
Reposted by Simon Lohse
olivia.science
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues. Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe. Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
Reposted by Simon Lohse
sabinaleonelli.bsky.social
Next week I keynote t international conf. Formal Ontology for Information Systems. I remain enchanted by possibilities & challenges of comp. ontologies & worry about disregard 4 crucial semantics in the wake of genAI. Note: virtual participation is FREE! www.dmi.unict.it/fois2025/?pa... #philsci 🧪
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
Reposted by Simon Lohse
center4philsci.bsky.social
We're Back!

Join us for a new semester of lunchtime talks beginning next week!

Talks are held on Tuesdays and Fridays at noon, either in the Center in CL1117 or online. Look forward to seeing you there!

More info on each talk can be found at www.centerphilsci.pi...
Reposted by Simon Lohse
cdutilhnovaes.bsky.social
It’s BlueSky official now 😄 I’m the incoming president of the European Philosophy Science Association, EPSA @epsaphilsci.bsky.social Wish me luck 😅
epsaphilsci.bsky.social
🗳️ We are happy to announce that the following members have been elected to the Steering Committee:

- Catarina Dutilh Noaves (President)
- Julie Zahle
- Saana Jukola
- Magdalena Malecka
- Samuel Schindler
- Simon Lohse
- Joanna Karolina Malinowska

Congratulations to them! 👏
Reposted by Simon Lohse
stefanocanali.bsky.social
Philosophical treats in Milan this week, thanks to the conference organised by @davideserpico.bsky.social and Francesco Guala for the end of their Normative kinds project.

#philsci #philsky
annaalexandrova.bsky.social
Heading to Milan to listen to some heroes of mine and to speak on whether thick concepts have a place in science #philsci #philsky
Normative Kinds Final Conference
dipafilo.unimi.it
simonlohse.bsky.social
Just accepted in Philosophy of Science:

Bschir/ Lohse:
*On 🐘s and 🐙s: Two Models of Pluralistic Policy Advice*

This is a discussion note responding to a great paper by Stephen John on pluralistic policy advice (www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...)

doi.org/10.1017/psa....

#philsci #ebp
On Elephants and Octopuses: Two Models of Pluralistic Policy Advice | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core
On Elephants and Octopuses: Two Models of Pluralistic Policy Advice
doi.org
Reposted by Simon Lohse
gregpriest.bsky.social
New study on #BlueSky for #SciComm.

“Bluesky posts demonstrate substantially higher levels of interaction (likes, reposts, replies, and quotes) and greater textual originality than previously reported for X, suggesting both stronger interactive and more interpretive engagement.”

🦋🦫🌱🐋🧪 #philsci
Research posts on Bluesky are more original — and get better engagement
Bluesky posts about science garner more likes and reposts than similar ones on X.
www.nature.com
Reposted by Simon Lohse
wesbonifay.bsky.social
Jan-Willem Romeijn’s closing address from a typical European podium #EPSA25 #philsci
Reposted by Simon Lohse
isis-radboud.bsky.social
Strong presence of our philosophy group at #epsa25 with Kian Salimkhani, @henkderegt.bsky.social, Karla Weingarten & @simonlohse.bsky.social presenting their work in philosophy of physics and AI. #philsci