siobhan
@siobhan-m.bsky.social
2.8K followers 630 following 770 posts
UAW 2320 NOLSW National Executive Board Trustee. @bostondsa.org, MUG. she/her. opinions my own, none of this is legal advice. words in @dsaworkingmass.bsky.social/ @onlabor.bsky.social/Democratic Left/Light & Air read: https://linktr.ee/siobhan_m
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
siobhan-m.bsky.social
this is hitler in 1939
I could supplement these
examples with dozens of the most cruel kind. For this reason we ask to be spared all sentimental talk. The German nation does not wish its interests to be determined and controlled by any foreign nation. France to the French, England to the English, America to the Americans, and Germany to the Germans. We are resolved to prevent the settlement in our country of a strange people which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land, and to oust it. For it is our will to educate our own nation for these leading positions. We have hundreds of thousands of very intelligent children of peasants and of the working classes. We shall have them educated - in fact we have already begun and we wish that one day they, and not the representatives of an alien race, may hold the leading positions in the State together with our educated classes. Above all, German culture, as its name alone shows, is German and not Jewish, and therefore its management and care will be entrusted to members of our own nation.
siobhan-m.bsky.social
this is a genuine question for lawyers who know this area of law better than i do—would a defamation suit be possible here?

(my guess is that cops have some loophole or another but can’t say for sure)
olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social
eventually politicians need to start advocating for criminal and civil penalties for people involved in fabricating stories to get citizens incarcerated.

or, put another way: a society that would like to keep functioning has to discourage baldfaced lying, especially by authorities
chicago.suntimes.com
Body-camera video appears to contradict the government’s claim that Marimar Martinez, 30, drove toward officers before one of them opened fire at her late Saturday morning in Brighton Park, her attorney claimed.
trib.al/9Sxu9IN
Reposted by siobhan
siobhan-m.bsky.social
lol this is apparently the only way to get cops to acknowledge how many people get hurt when they use tear gas
blockclubchi.bsky.social
27 police officers were among those injured by tear gas during a weekend protest, Chicago’s top cop says. blockclubchi.co/4nGOb0m
siobhan-m.bsky.social
#KavanaughRaid
dlknowles.bsky.social
Good reporting on the South Shore raid from South Side weekly here.

Confirms one thing I was told but didn't put in my own piece because I didn't have a second source and it seemed too insane: border agents segregated arrested residents by race

southsideweekly.com/federal-agen...
Federal Agents Storm South Shore Building, Detaining Families and Children
Families were woken by flashbangs and helicopters as hundreds of federal agents raided their homes. Days later, neighbors are still searching for the missing.
southsideweekly.com
siobhan-m.bsky.social
“do you understand politics” yes i understand that when one ruling party throws all of its resources into demonizing a small, vulnerable minority and the other party decides to stop talking about the issue, public opinion isn’t going to look great!
whatdoyoumean89.bsky.social
Look at the polling among Dems, that’s what I am saying. He can’t alienate half of his base. Do you understand politics.
siobhan-m.bsky.social
imo Dems are going to fully give up on us eventually regardless, but Newsom winning the primary would certainly accelerate that
siobhan-m.bsky.social
however much you hate the supreme court, it isn’t enough
siobhan-m.bsky.social
the thing is, this guy is absolutely wrong on the law.

our supreme court—including the liberals—unanimously agreed in DOE v Louisiana (2024) that federal law *doesn’t* prohibit discrimination or harassment against trans kids in schools!
Department of Education v.
Louisiana, 603 U.S. _
. (2024)
Overview Opinions Materials
Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kagan, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Jackson join, dissenting in part from the denial of applications for stays.
Respondents challenged a Department of Education rule implementing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Respondents contend that the rule unlawfully redefines sex discrimination; that it violates students' and employees' rights to bodily privacy and safety; and that its definition of hostile environment harassment is inconsistent wit the statute and violates the First Amendment. Every Member of the Court agrees respondents are entitled to interim relief as to three provisions of that Rule:
34 CFR §106.10 (2023) (defining sex
discrimination), $106.31(a)(2) (prohibiting schools from preventing individuals from accessing certain sex-separated spaces consistent with their gender identity), and $106.2's definition of hostile environment harassment. Respondents' alleged injuries flow from those three provisions. (2) Hostile environment harassment. Unwelcome sex-based conduct that, based on the totality of the circumstances, is subjectively and objectively offensive and is so severe or pervasive that it limits or denies a person's ability to participate in or benefit from the recipient's education program or activity (i.e., creates a hostile environment). Whether a hostile environment has been created is a fact-specific inquiry that includes consideration of the following:
(i) The degree to which the conduct affected the complainant's ability to access the recipient's education program or activity;
(ii) The type, frequency, and duration of the conduct; (iii) The parties' ages, roles within the recipient's education
program or activity, previous interactions, and other factors about each party that may be relevant to evaluating the effects of the conduct;
(iv) The location of the conduct and the context in which the
conduct occurred; and
(v) Other sex-based harassment in the recipient's education program or activity; or § 106.10 Scope.
Discrimination on the basis of sex includes discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Subpart D-Discrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Prohibited
§ 106.31 Education programs or activities.
(a) General.
(1) Except as provided elsewhere in this part, no person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any academic, extracurricular, research, occupational training, or other education program or activity operated by a recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
(2) In the limited circumstances in which Title IX or this part permits different treatment or separation on the basis of sex, a recipient must not carry out such different treatment or separation in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex by subjecting a person to more than de minimis harm, except as permitted by 20 U.S.C. 1681(a)(1) through (9) and the corresponding regulations
§§ 106.12 through 106.15, 20 U.S.C. 1680 and its corresponding regulation § 106.32(b)(1), or § 106.41 (b). Adopting a policy or engaging in a practice that prevents a person from participating in an education program or activity consistent with the person's gender identity subjects a person to more than de minimis harm on the basis of sex.
siobhan-m.bsky.social
we’ll finally be reuniting on the diamond
siobhan-m.bsky.social
15, 1B/pitcher if you’re desperate
siobhan-m.bsky.social
who could have possibly seen this coming? working-mass.com/2024/10/21/d...
Where Is This Headed?
One does not need to look far to see the potential end point. In the United Kingdom, the Labour Party, once supportive of trans rights as part of a broadly left agenda, has made a sharp rightward turn and is now leading a government that appears intent on driving trans people from existence in the UK. Labour have maintained a Tory ban on hormone therapy, including puberty blockers, from trans youth, forcing them to endure an excruciating puberty we have the capacity to prevent, but not entirely reverse. There are also disturbing reports of National Health Service GPs discontinuing their adult patients' hormone therapy and functionally forcing them to detransition. When a formerly-supportive party turns on a vulnerable constituency, the consequences are dire. Notably, Labour leader Keir Starmer's heads of strategy and policy were in Washington to meet with Democratic Party strategists in early September. These Labour Party advisors suggested Harris go "on the front foot and launch[] a new policy on" immigration akin to Starmer's
"Border Security Command," and encouraged Harris to think about a "longer-term question of making sure that the Democrats stay on the center ground."
siobhan-m.bsky.social
the latest in a yearslong trend of dems abandoning trans people. newsom as president would do exactly what starmer has done in the UK—put a friendly liberal face on our attempted eradication
lgbtqnation.com
Gavin Newsom vetoes gender education bill, declines to sign other trans protections - buff.ly/MTUAV85
siobhan-m.bsky.social
the thing is, this guy is absolutely wrong on the law.

our supreme court—including the liberals—unanimously agreed in DOE v Louisiana (2024) that federal law *doesn’t* prohibit discrimination or harassment against trans kids in schools!
Department of Education v.
Louisiana, 603 U.S. _
. (2024)
Overview Opinions Materials
Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kagan, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Jackson join, dissenting in part from the denial of applications for stays.
Respondents challenged a Department of Education rule implementing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Respondents contend that the rule unlawfully redefines sex discrimination; that it violates students' and employees' rights to bodily privacy and safety; and that its definition of hostile environment harassment is inconsistent wit the statute and violates the First Amendment. Every Member of the Court agrees respondents are entitled to interim relief as to three provisions of that Rule:
34 CFR §106.10 (2023) (defining sex
discrimination), $106.31(a)(2) (prohibiting schools from preventing individuals from accessing certain sex-separated spaces consistent with their gender identity), and $106.2's definition of hostile environment harassment. Respondents' alleged injuries flow from those three provisions. (2) Hostile environment harassment. Unwelcome sex-based conduct that, based on the totality of the circumstances, is subjectively and objectively offensive and is so severe or pervasive that it limits or denies a person's ability to participate in or benefit from the recipient's education program or activity (i.e., creates a hostile environment). Whether a hostile environment has been created is a fact-specific inquiry that includes consideration of the following:
(i) The degree to which the conduct affected the complainant's ability to access the recipient's education program or activity;
(ii) The type, frequency, and duration of the conduct; (iii) The parties' ages, roles within the recipient's education
program or activity, previous interactions, and other factors about each party that may be relevant to evaluating the effects of the conduct;
(iv) The location of the conduct and the context in which the
conduct occurred; and
(v) Other sex-based harassment in the recipient's education program or activity; or § 106.10 Scope.
Discrimination on the basis of sex includes discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Subpart D-Discrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Prohibited
§ 106.31 Education programs or activities.
(a) General.
(1) Except as provided elsewhere in this part, no person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any academic, extracurricular, research, occupational training, or other education program or activity operated by a recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
(2) In the limited circumstances in which Title IX or this part permits different treatment or separation on the basis of sex, a recipient must not carry out such different treatment or separation in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex by subjecting a person to more than de minimis harm, except as permitted by 20 U.S.C. 1681(a)(1) through (9) and the corresponding regulations
§§ 106.12 through 106.15, 20 U.S.C. 1680 and its corresponding regulation § 106.32(b)(1), or § 106.41 (b). Adopting a policy or engaging in a practice that prevents a person from participating in an education program or activity consistent with the person's gender identity subjects a person to more than de minimis harm on the basis of sex.
siobhan-m.bsky.social
we’re in a really dark place when the court will let states ban HRT but not conversion therapy
siobhan-m.bsky.social
you can’t even harass your classmates on the basis of their gender anymore, because of woke
brendelbored.bsky.social
We really hit on something with the 12 year old theory of governance because that’s really the entire political project. It’s being 12 years old and not even normal 12 year olds but real pieces of shit 12 year olds
Texas GOP candidate
Shelley Luther complains that students can't make fun of transgender children
By Jay Root, Staff Writer
Updated Feb 9, 2022 6:02 a.m.
siobhan-m.bsky.social
this isn’t just careless spending. it’s a deliberate effort by the trump admin to improve its image and manufacture consent for mass deportations, all using public money
criminalerin.bsky.social
What could 10,000 ICE jackboots each cost to recruit, Michael? $3,000,000? Wait, that cannot possibly be right *checks math*

"The [ad] campaign... is part of ICE’s $30 billion initiative to hire 10,000 more deportation officers by the end of the year."

Oh wow oh fuck jesus christ what the shit
ICE airs ads stirring up local frustration to recruit police for mass deportation efforts
An Associated Press tally shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is spending millions of dollars on TV recruitment ads targeting officers frustrated by local restrictions on immigration enforc...
apnews.com
siobhan-m.bsky.social
there’s exactly one political organization in this country that is large enough to take on the ruling parties and has the democratic structures necessary to be entirely member-controlled, not beholden to donors or entrenched leadership.

dsausa.org/join
Join DSA. Become a member today.
Democratic socialists have an historic opportunity and responsibility to play a central role in continuing the political revolution for the long term. As a democratic, grassroots organization, DSA is ...
dsausa.org
Reposted by siobhan
leftiblog.bsky.social
Substitute “Israel” for “cops” and absolutely no change required in the tweet.
siobhan-m.bsky.social
just about every time the cops—local, state, or federal—shoot or kill someone, they rush out a lie-riddled justification.

media then reports this without even giving the context of all the previous lies. they are assumed to be credible and never held to account for their lies. the cycle continues.
siobhan-m.bsky.social
*born yesterday voice*

i, for one, am shocked that the cops shot someone and immediately lied about it. i’m sure all the media outlets that breathlessly repeated their lies will be more hesitant to do that in the future!