Stephanie Kollmann
@slkollmann.bsky.social
law, policy, Illinoisances
reputedly "promoting left-wing causes"
reputedly "promoting left-wing causes"
January 14, 2026 at 2:35 AM
"I'd do it for free" challenge: accepted
January 14, 2026 at 12:30 AM
"I'd do it for free" challenge: accepted
INTERVIEW TEENAGERS
about what is happening to their friends and families and friends' families and neighborhoods and schools and sports and jobs and parents' jobs and new responsibilities like doing all of the public errands
And about what is fair and just and reasonable
They care about that
about what is happening to their friends and families and friends' families and neighborhoods and schools and sports and jobs and parents' jobs and new responsibilities like doing all of the public errands
And about what is fair and just and reasonable
They care about that
January 14, 2026 at 12:18 AM
INTERVIEW TEENAGERS
about what is happening to their friends and families and friends' families and neighborhoods and schools and sports and jobs and parents' jobs and new responsibilities like doing all of the public errands
And about what is fair and just and reasonable
They care about that
about what is happening to their friends and families and friends' families and neighborhoods and schools and sports and jobs and parents' jobs and new responsibilities like doing all of the public errands
And about what is fair and just and reasonable
They care about that
His rhetoric underpinning (what seems like total ignorance of) the law he wants to change is even worse:
"I will ensure more people have felonies on their criminal records! This will certainly help matters"
"I will ensure more people have felonies on their criminal records! This will certainly help matters"
January 14, 2026 at 12:02 AM
His rhetoric underpinning (what seems like total ignorance of) the law he wants to change is even worse:
"I will ensure more people have felonies on their criminal records! This will certainly help matters"
"I will ensure more people have felonies on their criminal records! This will certainly help matters"
Per ballotpedia,
ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Hou...
IDK if any of them are better. I just don't understand why the party can't be better.
Hopkins is going to Hopkins but he has endorsements from other people who apparently also didn't tell him this was an offensive nonstarter.
ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Hou...
IDK if any of them are better. I just don't understand why the party can't be better.
Hopkins is going to Hopkins but he has endorsements from other people who apparently also didn't tell him this was an offensive nonstarter.
January 13, 2026 at 11:56 PM
Per ballotpedia,
ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Hou...
IDK if any of them are better. I just don't understand why the party can't be better.
Hopkins is going to Hopkins but he has endorsements from other people who apparently also didn't tell him this was an offensive nonstarter.
ballotpedia.org/Illinois_Hou...
IDK if any of them are better. I just don't understand why the party can't be better.
Hopkins is going to Hopkins but he has endorsements from other people who apparently also didn't tell him this was an offensive nonstarter.
I guess somebody started their own unmask-ICE project
probably not subsidized by high net worth individuals
bsky.app/profile/brun...
probably not subsidized by high net worth individuals
bsky.app/profile/brun...
A Department of Homeland Security whistleblower has released the identities of about 4,500 ICE and Border Patrol employees Tuesday in what has been called potentially the largest agency data breach for the department.
Whistleblower drops 'largest ever' ICE leak to unmask agents: 'The last straw'
A Department of Homeland Security whistleblower has released the identities of about 4,500 ICE and Border Patrol employees Tuesday in what has been called potentially the largest agency data breach fo...
www.rawstory.com
January 13, 2026 at 11:10 PM
I guess somebody started their own unmask-ICE project
probably not subsidized by high net worth individuals
bsky.app/profile/brun...
probably not subsidized by high net worth individuals
bsky.app/profile/brun...
I have completed my employer's 2FA process over 5 times since 2PM
Also, every time I have checked the msft placebo-box (stay signed in)
I am ON CAMPUS
As soon as I figure out how to submit these 2FA fees on an expense report, it's over for you guys
Also, the fee is $1.25/login now. Inflation.
Also, every time I have checked the msft placebo-box (stay signed in)
I am ON CAMPUS
As soon as I figure out how to submit these 2FA fees on an expense report, it's over for you guys
Also, the fee is $1.25/login now. Inflation.
January 13, 2026 at 11:05 PM
I have completed my employer's 2FA process over 5 times since 2PM
Also, every time I have checked the msft placebo-box (stay signed in)
I am ON CAMPUS
As soon as I figure out how to submit these 2FA fees on an expense report, it's over for you guys
Also, the fee is $1.25/login now. Inflation.
Also, every time I have checked the msft placebo-box (stay signed in)
I am ON CAMPUS
As soon as I figure out how to submit these 2FA fees on an expense report, it's over for you guys
Also, the fee is $1.25/login now. Inflation.
Reposted by Stephanie Kollmann
It is funny to me that Lightfoot advertised her project to the public and to donors as "unmasking" immigration agents and posting their identities so the public knows who they are dealing with
And the minute Pam Bondi said "you better not"
That is no longer part of the project
And the minute Pam Bondi said "you better not"
That is no longer part of the project
January 13, 2026 at 3:56 PM
It is funny to me that Lightfoot advertised her project to the public and to donors as "unmasking" immigration agents and posting their identities so the public knows who they are dealing with
And the minute Pam Bondi said "you better not"
That is no longer part of the project
And the minute Pam Bondi said "you better not"
That is no longer part of the project
If your first and most important goal is to protect people abused by the government you figure out how to actually do that first. Before doing anything else.
You don't put them in legal jeopardy to advance your political goals
You don't put them in legal jeopardy to advance your political goals
January 13, 2026 at 4:02 PM
If your first and most important goal is to protect people abused by the government you figure out how to actually do that first. Before doing anything else.
You don't put them in legal jeopardy to advance your political goals
You don't put them in legal jeopardy to advance your political goals
You know who antagonizes their legal opposition without first calculating all of the obvious retaliation consequences?
Federal prosecutors, because they don't have to
Maybe not the best lead for a civil rights project the government will openly attack!
Federal prosecutors, because they don't have to
Maybe not the best lead for a civil rights project the government will openly attack!
January 13, 2026 at 3:59 PM
You know who antagonizes their legal opposition without first calculating all of the obvious retaliation consequences?
Federal prosecutors, because they don't have to
Maybe not the best lead for a civil rights project the government will openly attack!
Federal prosecutors, because they don't have to
Maybe not the best lead for a civil rights project the government will openly attack!
It is funny to me that Lightfoot advertised her project to the public and to donors as "unmasking" immigration agents and posting their identities so the public knows who they are dealing with
And the minute Pam Bondi said "you better not"
That is no longer part of the project
And the minute Pam Bondi said "you better not"
That is no longer part of the project
January 13, 2026 at 3:56 PM
It is funny to me that Lightfoot advertised her project to the public and to donors as "unmasking" immigration agents and posting their identities so the public knows who they are dealing with
And the minute Pam Bondi said "you better not"
That is no longer part of the project
And the minute Pam Bondi said "you better not"
That is no longer part of the project
January 13, 2026 at 3:48 PM
So far, Chicago taxpayers have paid approximately $11.9 million to settle and defend lawsuits sparked by the conduct of CPD officers during protests demanding a racial reckoning swept the city and erupted into unrest, according to a WTTW News analysis.
The Chicago City Council should agree to pay $875,000 to resolve a lawsuit filed by 25 Chicagoans who each say they were brutalized by city police officers during protests during the summer of 2020 after the police murder of George Floyd, city lawyers say. https://to.wttw.com/4qQ3oNM
January 13, 2026 at 3:46 PM