Kyle Walding
@tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
5.9K followers 340 following 280 posts
TB doc, Manhattan TB consultant @ NYC Dept of Health NYU Clinical Asst Professor of ID @ Bellevue Hospital Loyola Med/Peds & Stanford ID ❤️: TB, ID, med ed, public health, health equity, immigrant safety/rights Views = mine = great, & ≠ my employers' | 🏳️‍🌈
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
me: is she sexually active?
them: she’s 82
me: word, is she sexually active?
Reposted by Kyle Walding
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
gave an ED provider some very gentle (but important!) clinical feedback today and the person said “we hardly ever get feedback — thank you so much for letting me know!”

this is so gracious! we could all take lessons
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
if you’re a physician yelling about vaccine committee removals but not about flagrant human rights abuses & genocide, check your priorities

there are no ‘lanes’ when it comes to the preservation of human life and dignity—we have a moral responsibility to speak out and act to protect the vulnerable
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
hahahaha, you’d have to ask someone smarter than me!
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
i actually don’t see race as a proxy but a misleading social construct

it is significant work to tease out the actual variables, but it’s worth the work to make actual associations (or recognize the lack of association) rather than invent associations/discordances that perpetuate inequity
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
right, it’s not always visible bc colorism and racism are separate -isms; also, being from Africa does not identify a clear “race”
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
educating patients on their risk for conditions is essential, but education about these risks should be based in evidence, not carried on from (however well meaning) racist categorizations

use origin/travel, nutrition/supplementation, behaviors, etc to ID risks—these span “racial” categories
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
race (not real) has no correlation w country of origin (real)

country of origin (& even smaller regional commonalities like zip code) may have patterns based on cultural characteristics, disease epi, and health access, but even those may not be consistent
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
the concept of race isn’t necessary to understand that less melanated skin is at higher risk for UV damage—that’s true regardless of someone’s ‘background’
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
just a quick reminder to the medical community that ~the concept of race has no basis in scientific evidence and should not impact your *medical* decision-making~

race *does have* social implications (which can affect access/quality) bc of the disproportionate global power assigned to ‘whiteness’
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
i hadn’t! but i did read it and sent it to my bureau director too
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
#TBSky saw this note today: “M africanum in sputum; pt doesn’t meet criteria for NTM disease, stop all therapy”

“MTB complex” includes several closely related human pathogens:
- M tb
- M bovis
- M africanum
- (& M microti, caprae, pinnipedii, orygis, canetti)

all should be treated as ‘TB disease’!
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
#TBSky: have any clinical TB folks seen hearing loss with BPaLM?

this is not a documented/common adverse effect that i’m aware of, but moxi does have post marketing reports of hearing loss and linezolid could potentially cause it via peripheral neuropathy

thoughts?
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
my goodness lol 😆
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
i agree! i do find it useful for identifying references, but i almost never trust the extracted and summarized text because it’s not infrequently misleading or plain wrong! i do use it nearly every day tho to find papers about what i’m trying to understand lol — always read the primary literature!
Reposted by Kyle Walding
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
this statement is too broad! there are so many different genres doing great things right now — are you pretty open?
Reposted by Kyle Walding
jakescottmd.bsky.social
This wasn’t built by an institution or backed by funding.

It was built by clinicians, pharmacists, scientists, & anonymous contributors.

No sponsors. No conflicts. Just evidence.

I’d log in at midnight and see Anonymous Koala editing rows.

That’s public science: open, people-powered, and shared.
jakescottmd.bsky.social
105 controlled vaccine trials.
110 yrs. 1.8 M participants.
All in one live, crowd-sourced sheet.

Built by contributors worldwide to counter the myth that vaccines weren’t tested with controls.

Quiet work still breaks through the noise.
www.bradspellberg.com/vaccine-rcts
@bradspellberg.bsky.social
tbrnaughttb.bsky.social
omg real eggs in this economy? ID could never