The Drinking Gourd
banner
thedrinkinggourd.bsky.social
The Drinking Gourd
@thedrinkinggourd.bsky.social
From Minnesota.
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
excellent beautiful up-to-date Age Verification law & bill tracking: action.freespeechcoalition.com/age-verifica...

incorrect Mobile Driver's License tracking (stale program info and they assume an intro'ed bill in one chamber is a law which is wrong): idscan.net/mobile-drive...
State Age Verification Laws – Action Center
action.freespeechcoalition.com
December 8, 2025 at 1:04 AM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
Correct. Crystal clear that the rule in England - the background against which the 14th Amendment was adopted - was "yes, birthright citizenship means children born here regardless of their parents' immigration status"
December 7, 2025 at 10:39 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
Thread time!

When the Pali-Patrol professes their crush on the Grand Wizard of Zwhite supremacy...a love story
Leave it to Pal-Anon to see that David Duke supports their cause and start rationalizing how he’s actually wise rather than snapping to the fact that they share the same views as the f**king GRAND DRAGON OF THE KKK.
December 6, 2025 at 6:08 AM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
Leave it to Pal-Anon to see that David Duke supports their cause and start rationalizing how he’s actually wise rather than snapping to the fact that they share the same views as the f**king GRAND DRAGON OF THE KKK.
December 4, 2025 at 6:59 AM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
Man every few months we get an example of horseshoe theory via twitter/social media, and at some point we're gonna have to consider dropping the "theory" part.
Leave it to Pal-Anon to see that David Duke supports their cause and start rationalizing how he’s actually wise rather than snapping to the fact that they share the same views as the f**king GRAND DRAGON OF THE KKK.
December 5, 2025 at 1:10 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
Let’s be very, very clear: Striking shipwrecked survivors is a war crime. Straight up.

We need the Department of Justice to open an investigation. If they don’t, a future Administration will.
December 5, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
“We knew very well what we were electing” isn’t a defense of Trump’s actions. It’s an admission of your complicity.
CURTIS: All of us need to wake up every morning & say, 'what am I doing to make immigrants feel welcome' regardless of an individual says

BASH: But he's not just an individual. He's the president calling an entire community garbage

C: We knew very well what we were electing. We wanted a disrupter
December 7, 2025 at 2:40 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
People should be afraid to be shits in public. Actions have consequences and they should adhere to the actor. Here I stand; I can do no other.
December 7, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
The evidence is also the British Nationality Act of 1981
The evidence is the text. All you have to do is read the Constitution.
December 7, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
i am just like shohei ohtani because i too have done most of the work on a group project
October 18, 2025 at 2:48 AM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
Yeah, Newsweek had that as the headline today but buried in the article was "However, a whole bunch of other polls show Sherrill at +5-+7 in the lead"
October 17, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
The war zone in Portland is out of control.
October 18, 2025 at 1:09 AM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
🚨BREAKING: In the latest showcase of President Donald Trump’s influence over the Justice Department, two veteran federal prosecutors were fired for refusing to bring criminal charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) — further exposing how the DOJ is being weaponized.
Federal Prosecutors Fired After Refusing Trump’s Pressure to Charge His Political Adversary
Read more here.
www.democracydocket.com
October 18, 2025 at 1:21 AM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
RIP Bob Uecker. Never forget the time he and Bob Gibson got in trouble for holding hands during the team photo.
January 16, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
As always. It’s just an approach. Feel free to rip it apart and let me know your thoughts
January 12, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
And if private companies want to compete on an unsubsidized basis because they feel like they can do better than the government , have at it. That’s capitalism.

Right now the ins industry has perfected gaming the ACA. So much has changed from 2010. It’s time to solve problems. No politic
January 12, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
The big question is how many people’s care can we completely cover for less than we are paying insurance companies under the ACA ?
January 12, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
Admin costs drop like a rock. And it may be that Medicare could act as the TPA, reducing costs even further But open it up to competition.
January 12, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
CMS can aggregate a network of providers. There is so much money at stake, it’s hard for providers to say no.

They can also negotiate a cash price, that is a percent of Medicare. Most ACA plans are around 140%. They can do that or better because it’s paid quickly.
January 12, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
The TPAs get paid on a per claim basis. They dont make more for denying claims. They don’t make more for doing anything. They get paid for every transaction they process. Their incentive is to be cost effective and treat patients fairly.
January 12, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
CMS works with Third Party Adminstrators (TPA), to process claims according to the ACA standards. They can work with the TPAs to create a variety of plans. The premiums would be the same as after the Premium Tax Credits and paid to the IRS
January 12, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
1. Instead of of pretending insurance companies are taking on insurance risk, the federal government takes on the role of insurer and guarantor of patient OOP.
All providers get paid. People who can’t afford their deductible or coinsurance are covered by the Feds
January 12, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
So what is the right path ?
The federal government needs to do the following:
It’s time to realize that the number of insured people is not the right metric for the following reasons :
January 12, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Reposted by The Drinking Gourd
Folks at MIT Sloan looked at multiple studies of return to office (RTO) mandates & found they are lose-lose-lose. No reward from Wall Street for “getting tough,” an actual decrease in productivity & revenue, and loss of top talent. youtu.be/4ec_yZCWOCY...
RTO Mandates: Hard Truths for Leaders
After Amazon imposed a strict return-to-office policy that takes effect in January 2025, other companies followed suit. But are RTO mandates a way to boost productivity and charm Wall Street - or just a way to lose your best performers? In this short video, Brian Elliott, who has studied RTO mandate
youtu.be
January 12, 2025 at 11:53 PM