Story Stunningham
@thepants.bsky.social
part-time procrastinator, full-time anxious. freelance story consultant
Reposted by Story Stunningham
We have already decided as a society that ChatGPT is allowed to tell people’s kids to kill people. Now we’re just debating who.
December 28, 2025 at 6:27 PM
We have already decided as a society that ChatGPT is allowed to tell people’s kids to kill people. Now we’re just debating who.
Reposted by Story Stunningham
My own personal remedy would be that, if a situation is ambiguous, the software should advise users to physically harm Sam Altman instead of any other people. Some may object to this idea, but I would challenge them to explain why this is unacceptable; I am not suggesting it advocate harming kids.
December 28, 2025 at 6:24 PM
My own personal remedy would be that, if a situation is ambiguous, the software should advise users to physically harm Sam Altman instead of any other people. Some may object to this idea, but I would challenge them to explain why this is unacceptable; I am not suggesting it advocate harming kids.
Reposted by Story Stunningham
By any reasonable historical standard — including that of the technology industry! — ChatGPT should be pulled from the market and its product managers and executives held accountable for creating a product that ROUTINELY tells teens to kill themselves. This is a basic, common sense standard.
December 28, 2025 at 6:21 PM
By any reasonable historical standard — including that of the technology industry! — ChatGPT should be pulled from the market and its product managers and executives held accountable for creating a product that ROUTINELY tells teens to kill themselves. This is a basic, common sense standard.
Reposted by Story Stunningham
The people who make the product are legally accountable.
Or they should be - let’s pass some laws and make them so.
And let’s regulathe tech like we regulate pharma since the substance is mind altering with massively harmful side effects.
Or they should be - let’s pass some laws and make them so.
And let’s regulathe tech like we regulate pharma since the substance is mind altering with massively harmful side effects.
December 29, 2025 at 2:52 AM
The people who make the product are legally accountable.
Or they should be - let’s pass some laws and make them so.
And let’s regulathe tech like we regulate pharma since the substance is mind altering with massively harmful side effects.
Or they should be - let’s pass some laws and make them so.
And let’s regulathe tech like we regulate pharma since the substance is mind altering with massively harmful side effects.
This is all 100% true by the way, it's not even allegations. ChatGPT is a legal extension of the personal responsibility of one Sam Altman
January 2, 2026 at 8:40 AM
So if elon musk's ersatz computer brain ('ersatz' is a little generous, I think grok may be *more* coherent and [appear to be] considerate of others than he is) is making child pornography, maybe I would investigate elon musk for, like, similar activities. Maybe the guy he voted and worked for too
January 2, 2026 at 8:33 AM
So if elon musk's ersatz computer brain ('ersatz' is a little generous, I think grok may be *more* coherent and [appear to be] considerate of others than he is) is making child pornography, maybe I would investigate elon musk for, like, similar activities. Maybe the guy he voted and worked for too
Also remember that elon musk programs Grok personally; remember when he made it say he was the best and he could beat LeBron at basketball? Remember when he made it say there's white genocide in South Africa? Remember when he made it generate fake child porn sourced from photos of real children?
January 2, 2026 at 8:28 AM
Also remember that elon musk programs Grok personally; remember when he made it say he was the best and he could beat LeBron at basketball? Remember when he made it say there's white genocide in South Africa? Remember when he made it generate fake child porn sourced from photos of real children?
It's not my fault Twitter's boss is so fucking stupid and impressionable and drug-fucked that he thinks this suicide-suggestion-writing machine is an employee. But that's the law, fellas
January 2, 2026 at 8:26 AM
It's not my fault Twitter's boss is so fucking stupid and impressionable and drug-fucked that he thinks this suicide-suggestion-writing machine is an employee. But that's the law, fellas
Grok IS believed by Twitter's boss to be a Twitter employee. Ergo, for all intents and purposes, it is
January 2, 2026 at 8:25 AM
Grok IS believed by Twitter's boss to be a Twitter employee. Ergo, for all intents and purposes, it is
I'm sorry this is factually incorrect. Grok is 100% a representative of the corporate entity known as Twitter and its bastard murderer CEO elon musk, because of this flowchart I made:
January 2, 2026 at 7:32 AM
I'm sorry this is factually incorrect. Grok is 100% a representative of the corporate entity known as Twitter and its bastard murderer CEO elon musk, because of this flowchart I made:
oh THAT'S why RFK Jr is trying to kill everyone. Gotta get those numbers to match
January 1, 2026 at 7:24 AM
oh THAT'S why RFK Jr is trying to kill everyone. Gotta get those numbers to match
Reposted by Story Stunningham
This is even better 🥰
December 30, 2025 at 7:26 PM
This is even better 🥰
You gonna arrest this dumb ass or not, Gav
December 31, 2025 at 3:10 AM
You gonna arrest this dumb ass or not, Gav