I say this to say: intellectual property law is the biggest sham in history it slaughtered millions during covid, it upholds the worst of the worst industry and silos important knowledge from the general public. Abolition of IP is as important as “seize my the means of production”

There are some things that thus must be destroyed. Prisons don’t exist without violence and coercion. Fire to them. Cops don’t exist without violence or coercion. Completely abolish them. Education of course can exist without violence or coercion. In fact it *works better*

It’s no different than the way rapists use rape jokes both to show other rapists they have a possible ally in class solidarity but also to reinforce hierarchies of gender that some people (women, trans people) are raped and that cis men like him do the raping as a form of gender policing

This has made them completely unprepared to fight fascists who are completely willing to use the systems liberals have developed until they can gain power and burn it all down.

But liberals have developed their rhetoric to chastise the left rather than fight the right, so they have developed a culture that holds working within the system or within "liberal norms" to be righteous no matter what.

This is obviously nonsense. Any anarchist knows that the content and context of an act is important. The use of violence to create freedom is completely different than to cause oppression. Speech in the service of liberation is completely different than speech in the service of domination.

In this case, though, liberal journalists are ignoring the ends, and only focusing on the means. In their view, as long as somebody is using "liberal" means such as free speech and debate, then no matter the content of their speech, it supports liberal ends.

Normally, when the unity of means and ends is brought up, its to counter the idea of ends justifying the means. An authoritarian state can not lead to freedom, because the use of authoritarian means leads to authoritarian ends.

If you think fundamental human rights are an area where we have to "respect the democratic will of the public," you have sold your soul to the devil. You have a weathervane where your moral compass should be.

Become Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant-pilled
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZYN...

Okay, so if death is so good why are you choosing to still be alive right now?

It's plainly obvious that if true immortality existed the actual moral obligation would be to share it with everyone, not destroy it out of a misguided sense of ressentiment

People prefer being alive. That's why we understand murder to be wrong.