What About Yesterday?
@whataboutyesterday.bsky.social
What about us?
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Federal Judge TRHOWS OUT Donald Trump's Defamation Complaint Against the New York
Times
youtu.be/J-L_BaaGcnw?...
Times
youtu.be/J-L_BaaGcnw?...
Federal Judge TRHOWS OUT Donald Trump's Defamation Complaint Against the New York Times
YouTube video by Glenn Kirschner
youtu.be
September 19, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Federal Judge TRHOWS OUT Donald Trump's Defamation Complaint Against the New York
Times
youtu.be/J-L_BaaGcnw?...
Times
youtu.be/J-L_BaaGcnw?...
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Over the next 15 months, we can expect a coordinated campaign — backed by the full power of the executive branch — to undermine confidence in our election system. Here’s what to expect, and how key actors can be ready to respond: bit.ly/4fRIqtA
What to Expect Next in the Trump Administration’s Strategy to Meddle with the Vote
Efforts to protect the coming elections must begin now.
www.brennancenter.org
September 19, 2025 at 10:08 PM
Over the next 15 months, we can expect a coordinated campaign — backed by the full power of the executive branch — to undermine confidence in our election system. Here’s what to expect, and how key actors can be ready to respond: bit.ly/4fRIqtA
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
I wonder if the statute of limitations are passed to sue all the stations that only showed the bad side of Osama bin Laden
Trump: "When 97% of the stories are bad about a person, that's no longer free speech."
September 19, 2025 at 10:08 PM
I wonder if the statute of limitations are passed to sue all the stations that only showed the bad side of Osama bin Laden
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
We'll be Live-streaming our big book launch for SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND HATE at the 92st Y NYC- and I'm thrilled to announce the moderator will be the hilarious and brilliant Cristela Alonzo.
Tickets for both live & streaming at:
www.92ny.org/event/john-f...
Thursday, September 25, 8pm.
Tickets for both live & streaming at:
www.92ny.org/event/john-f...
Thursday, September 25, 8pm.
September 16, 2025 at 10:40 PM
We'll be Live-streaming our big book launch for SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND HATE at the 92st Y NYC- and I'm thrilled to announce the moderator will be the hilarious and brilliant Cristela Alonzo.
Tickets for both live & streaming at:
www.92ny.org/event/john-f...
Thursday, September 25, 8pm.
Tickets for both live & streaming at:
www.92ny.org/event/john-f...
Thursday, September 25, 8pm.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Yeah, if you're in the media and someone insists that "they" were celebrating his murder and therefore "they" have to suffer some sort of retribution, you have an obligation to ask who "they" are and what, specifically, they did to celebrate this.
You can't just let them throw that gas on the fire.
You can't just let them throw that gas on the fire.
Keep seeing/hearing news reports of MAGA fury at people celebrating Kirk’s killing (just now, NPR cited Stephen Miller’s outrage about this). But I have yet to see/hear a single example reported of such “celebration” —nothing close to Kirk’s own vile celebration of Paul Pelosi’s hammer attacker.
September 14, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Yeah, if you're in the media and someone insists that "they" were celebrating his murder and therefore "they" have to suffer some sort of retribution, you have an obligation to ask who "they" are and what, specifically, they did to celebrate this.
You can't just let them throw that gas on the fire.
You can't just let them throw that gas on the fire.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Highly recommended, especially if you're hearing about Charlie Kirk via the absolutely useless mainstream media reporting on him.
OUT NOW: @michaelehayden.bsky.social and I made one of our “Who the Hell?” episodes for Charlie Kirk to counter the gross revisionism and lies in mainstream press. We covered how he died and how he lived — honestly
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/4Pxo...
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/4Pxo...
036: Who the Hell Was Charlie Kirk?
Podcast Episode · Posting Through It · 09/13/2025 · 1h 31m
podcasts.apple.com
September 13, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Highly recommended, especially if you're hearing about Charlie Kirk via the absolutely useless mainstream media reporting on him.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
I've written a lot about disordered discourse and counterpublics, but given recent events I want to cover a key part of disordered discourse, which I call the four pillars of disordered doubt.
September 9, 2025 at 4:28 PM
I've written a lot about disordered discourse and counterpublics, but given recent events I want to cover a key part of disordered discourse, which I call the four pillars of disordered doubt.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Does anything in this picture say, "federal agents making a lawful arrest?" Perhaps they identified themselves. But when did it go out of fashion for law enforcement to look like law enforcement?
Breaking News: Brad Lander, the New York City comptroller who is running for mayor, was detained by ICE agents at an immigration court as he tried to escort a migrant out of the courthouse to prevent his arrest. nyti.ms/4jWkANE
June 17, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Does anything in this picture say, "federal agents making a lawful arrest?" Perhaps they identified themselves. But when did it go out of fashion for law enforcement to look like law enforcement?
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Are we clear now a private businessman shouldn’t be in a position to control the space program—that this richest man in the world fueled by drugs, ego & hate shouldn’t be partnering with a malignant sociopath in the WH immunized by the SCOTUS & bent on pocketing billions & flouting the Constitution?
June 6, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Are we clear now a private businessman shouldn’t be in a position to control the space program—that this richest man in the world fueled by drugs, ego & hate shouldn’t be partnering with a malignant sociopath in the WH immunized by the SCOTUS & bent on pocketing billions & flouting the Constitution?
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
During Trump and Musk’s public fight, Musk posted:
“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate”.
What did Elon do to ensure Trump won the election? Do tell!
“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate”.
What did Elon do to ensure Trump won the election? Do tell!
June 5, 2025 at 9:17 PM
During Trump and Musk’s public fight, Musk posted:
“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate”.
What did Elon do to ensure Trump won the election? Do tell!
“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate”.
What did Elon do to ensure Trump won the election? Do tell!
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
This kind of clear, direct explanation of what’s happening is basic journalism and yet it’s surprising to hear it stated so forthrightly in this mealy-mouthed era.
Cuts have consequences, illustrated. As seen on TV 📺
June 3, 2025 at 11:14 AM
This kind of clear, direct explanation of what’s happening is basic journalism and yet it’s surprising to hear it stated so forthrightly in this mealy-mouthed era.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Remember when Donald Trump got caught with all sorts of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago after saying he didn't have anything, and then he got indicted but the judge slow walked the case to death? Yup. He did that.
June 1, 2025 at 5:31 PM
Remember when Donald Trump got caught with all sorts of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago after saying he didn't have anything, and then he got indicted but the judge slow walked the case to death? Yup. He did that.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
"In essence, former officials said, nobody is above the law except Mr. Trump."
Happening right in front of us - a rule-of-law crisis created by the Supreme Court and Republicans in the Senate
Happening right in front of us - a rule-of-law crisis created by the Supreme Court and Republicans in the Senate
June 1, 2025 at 4:34 PM
"In essence, former officials said, nobody is above the law except Mr. Trump."
Happening right in front of us - a rule-of-law crisis created by the Supreme Court and Republicans in the Senate
Happening right in front of us - a rule-of-law crisis created by the Supreme Court and Republicans in the Senate
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
A radical transformation of our way of life is underway. Don’t let anyone gaslight you into thinking this administration is normal.
June 1, 2025 at 3:23 PM
A radical transformation of our way of life is underway. Don’t let anyone gaslight you into thinking this administration is normal.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
I'd much rather be scammed by some poor mom trying to feed her kids than the richest man in the world trying to add to his own wealth, but maybe I'm a sap.
June 1, 2025 at 4:22 PM
I'd much rather be scammed by some poor mom trying to feed her kids than the richest man in the world trying to add to his own wealth, but maybe I'm a sap.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Raskin: This is a gangster state. This is not basically a legitimate government that is sometimes doing corrupt things. This is an essentially corrupt enterprise. It's like watching The Sopranos. Every day, they get up and they try to figure out how to plunder and pillage the people
May 31, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Raskin: This is a gangster state. This is not basically a legitimate government that is sometimes doing corrupt things. This is an essentially corrupt enterprise. It's like watching The Sopranos. Every day, they get up and they try to figure out how to plunder and pillage the people
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Signs you might be a far right authoritarian party (#3168):
Courts & the rule of law: they should have no role here
Courts & the rule of law: they should have no role here
Leavitt: The courts should have no role here. There is a troubling & dangerous trend of unelected judges inserting themselves into the presidential decision making process. America cannot function if President Trump has his sensitive diplomatic or trade negotiations railroaded by activist judges.
May 29, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Signs you might be a far right authoritarian party (#3168):
Courts & the rule of law: they should have no role here
Courts & the rule of law: they should have no role here
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
The most corrupt presidency in the history of the United States.
NYT, page one:
The “$1.5 billion golf complex” and “Trump skyscraper .. are the Trump family’s first projects in Vietnam — part of a global moneymaking enterprise that no family of a sitting American president has ever attempted on this scale.”
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/25/w...
The “$1.5 billion golf complex” and “Trump skyscraper .. are the Trump family’s first projects in Vietnam — part of a global moneymaking enterprise that no family of a sitting American president has ever attempted on this scale.”
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/25/w...
May 25, 2025 at 2:22 PM
The most corrupt presidency in the history of the United States.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
“It’s true that narcissism is associated with more impulsive, error-prone decision-making. But … [w]hether consciously or not, narcissists hold power by keeping others in a state of psychological whiplash.“
www.huffpost.com/entry/psycho...
www.huffpost.com/entry/psycho...
May 24, 2025 at 10:05 PM
“It’s true that narcissism is associated with more impulsive, error-prone decision-making. But … [w]hether consciously or not, narcissists hold power by keeping others in a state of psychological whiplash.“
www.huffpost.com/entry/psycho...
www.huffpost.com/entry/psycho...
Reposted by What About Yesterday?
There are two possibilities here.
1. His advisors didn't know it wasn't true.
2. His advisors did know it wasn't true.
If they didn't know it wasn't true, they showed an incredible lack of competence in not making sure it was true.
If they did know it wasn't true, they're evil.
1. His advisors didn't know it wasn't true.
2. His advisors did know it wasn't true.
If they didn't know it wasn't true, they showed an incredible lack of competence in not making sure it was true.
If they did know it wasn't true, they're evil.
May 23, 2025 at 1:14 AM
There are two possibilities here.
1. His advisors didn't know it wasn't true.
2. His advisors did know it wasn't true.
If they didn't know it wasn't true, they showed an incredible lack of competence in not making sure it was true.
If they did know it wasn't true, they're evil.
1. His advisors didn't know it wasn't true.
2. His advisors did know it wasn't true.
If they didn't know it wasn't true, they showed an incredible lack of competence in not making sure it was true.
If they did know it wasn't true, they're evil.
Reposted by What About Yesterday?