Supreme Court leaves Obergefell intact

Reposted by Ann Bartow, Eric J. Segall, David S. Tanenhaus , and 5 more Ann Bartow, Eric J. Segall, David S. Tanenhaus, Anna O. Law, James Goodwin, Robert C. Richards, David Darmofal, Andrew Jacobs

31%

Scholar power: 31.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ann Bartow	26%	10	8.2%
🎓 Eric J. Segall	27%	7	7.1%
🎓 David S. Tanenhaus	21%	8	5.9%
🎓 Anna O. Law	20%	4	4.0%
🎓 James Goodwin	5%	26	2.5%
🎓 Robert C. Richards	3%	30	1.6%
🎓 David Darmofal	3%	11	1.0%
🎓 Andrew Jacobs	2%	17	0.8%
Total			31.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

78.0%

14.9 h

1814

31.3%

Ranking score

1.321

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mark Joseph Stern

@mjsdc.bsky.social

New: The Supreme Court DENIES Kim Davis' request to overturn Obergefell, the marriage equality decision. No noted dissents. www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...

DAVIS, KIM V. ERMOLD, DAVID, ET AL.
The motion of Foundation for Moral Law for leave to file a
brief as amicus curiae out of time is denied. The petition for
a writ of certiorari is denied.

November 10, 2025 at 2:31 PM

Reposted by Timothy D. McBride, Kathryn A. Phillips

0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Timothy D. McBride	0%	23	0.0%
🎓 Kathryn A. Phillips	-	42	-
Total			0.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

100.0%

14.9 h

349

0.0%

Ranking score

0.794

Formula for ranking score (article): scholar_power × max(3 × (total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_published, 1))

New York Times

Supreme Court Denies Request to Revisit Same-Sex Marriage Decision

Kim Davis, a Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses, had asked the court to reconsider its landmark 2015 opinion.

Reposts 349 14h

by Stephen I. Vladeck Reposted by Steve Peers

23%

Scholar power: 23.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Stephen I. Vladeck	18%	7	14.3%
🎓 Steve Peers	18%	27	9.4%
Total			23.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

74.0%

14.9 h

416

23.6%

Ranking score

0.576

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Steve Vladeck

@stevevladeck.bsky.social

#BREAKING: Over no public dissents, #SCOTUS denies Kim Davis's petition asking the justices to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges (which recognized federal constitutional protections for same-sex marriage):

www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...

www.supremecourt.gov

November 10, 2025 at 2:31 PM

by Ilya Somin

30%

Scholar power: 30.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ilya Somin	23%	20	30.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

79.0%

8.6 h

7

30.9%

Ranking score

0.357

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Ilya Somin

@ilyasomin.bsky.social

Supreme Court rejects case seeking to overturn right to same-sex marriage. I was one of many observers who predicted this. Obergfell v. Hodges is highly unlikely to be reversed, and it was never going to happen in this dog of a case: reason.com/volokh/2025/...

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Casing Seeking to Overturn Obergefell

This result is unsurprising, and was predicted by most analysts, including myself.

reason.com

November 10, 2025 at 8:50 PM

Reposted by Laia Balcells, Rosemary A. Joyce

3%

Scholar power: 3.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Laia Balcells	7%	22	3.3%
🎓 Rosemary A. Joyce	1%	34	0.6%
Total			3.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

69.0%

14.7 h

2642

3.9%

Ranking score

0.184

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

ACLU

@aclu.org

BREAKING: The Supreme Court denied an attempt to challenge Obergefell v. Hodges, the case affirming marriage equality nationwide.

Our freedom to marry remains the law of the land.

November 10, 2025 at 2:46 PM

Reposted by Karen Benjamin Guzzo, Rosemary A. Joyce

2%

Scholar power: 2.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Karen Benjamin Guzzo	4%	27	2.1%
🎓 Rosemary A. Joyce	1%	34	0.6%
Total			2.7%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

77.0%

14.9 h

660

2.7%

Ranking score

0.146

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Chris Geidner

@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

BREAKING: The Supreme Court DENIES former county clerk Kim Davis's request for the justices to take up her longshot bid to overturn 2015's Obergefell v. Hodges marriage equality decision. No justice even writes about the request.

25-125 DAVIS, KIM V. ERMOLD, DAVID, ET AL.
The motion of Foundation for Moral Law for leave to file a
brief as amicus curiae out of time is denied. The petition for
a writ of certiorari is denied.

November 10, 2025 at 2:34 PM

by Trevon D. Logan

4%

Scholar power: 4.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Trevon D. Logan	3%	21	4.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

0.4 h

11

4.1%

Ranking score

0.141

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Trevon Logan

@trevondlogan.bsky.social

I find it absolutely hilarious that gay conservatives use the SCOTUS decision to not reconsider Obergefell v. Hodges as proof that progressive gays are fear-mongers while prominent conservatives openly admit that they are committed to ending same sex marriage in the United States.

November 11, 2025 at 5:01 AM

Reposted by Timothy D. McBride

0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Timothy D. McBride	0%	23	0.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

100.0%

14.7 h

9

0.0%

Ranking score

0.1

Formula for ranking score (article): scholar_power × max(3 × (total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_published, 1))

The Wall Street Journal

Supreme Court declines to reconsider same-sex marriage decision

The court said it wouldn’t take up an appeal seeking to overturn a 2015 ruling that gave same-sex couples the constitutional right to marry.

Reposts 9 14h

Reposted by Joe R. Feagin

3%

Scholar power: 3.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Joe R. Feagin	5%	62	3.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

77.0%

14.4 h

440

3.9%

Ranking score

0.097

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Phil Lewis

@phillewis.bsky.social

The Supreme Court has rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide

Supreme Court Rejects Call To Overturn Its Decision Legalizing Same-sex Marriage Nationwide

The Supreme Court has rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

www.huffpost.com

November 10, 2025 at 3:01 PM

by Jonathan H. Adler

24%

Scholar power: 24.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jonathan H. Adler	22%	14	24.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

70.0%

14.3 h

12

24.7%

Ranking score

0.09

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Jonathan H. Adler

@jadler1969.bsky.social

The Supreme Court denied the petition asking it to reconsider same-sex marriage. There was no noted dissent. This should not come as a surprise to anyone (and if you were surprised, perhaps reconsider your sources of court commentary).

November 10, 2025 at 3:10 PM

Reposted by John R. Hutchinson

4%

Scholar power: 4%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 John R. Hutchinson	-	64	-

by Cas Mudde

15%

Scholar power: 15.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Cas Mudde	7%	51	15.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

66.0%

14.0 h

60

15.0%

Ranking score

0.061

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Cas Ⓜ️udde

@casmudde.bsky.social

I did not see this coming and I'll take it... happily! 🏳️‍🌈

US supreme court rejects call to overturn decision legalizing same-sex marriage

Justices turn away appeal from former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples

www.theguardian.com

November 10, 2025 at 3:25 PM

by Richard W. Painter

17%

Scholar power: 17.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Richard W. Painter	18%	10	17.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

12.5 h

121

17.1%

Ranking score

0.053

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by David S. Cohen

22%

Scholar power: 22.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 David S. Cohen	19%	16	22.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

61.0%

14.5 h

10

22.8%

Ranking score

0.049

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

David S. Cohen

@dsc250.bsky.social

Good! But not at all surprising. The media run-up to this was unnecessarily inflammatory.

The Washington Post @washingtonpost.com · 14h

Breaking news: The Supreme Court has declined to consider a challenge to its landmark 2015 ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

The challenge came from a county clerk who stopped issuing marriage licenses shortly after the ruling.

Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to landmark gay marriage ruling

The announcement indicates there is not an appetite among the high court’s conservative majority to revisit one of the court’s most significant decisions in recent years.

www.washingtonpost.com

November 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM

Reposted by Rodríguez Fernández, Olivier Mannoni

2%

Scholar power: 2.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Rodríguez Fernández	6%	6	1.5%
🎓 Olivier Mannoni	3%	5	0.7%
Total			2.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

73.0%

14.6 h

345

2.1%

Ranking score

0.046

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

The New York Times

@nytimes.com

Breaking News: The Supreme Court denied a request to consider overturning its landmark decision to legalize same-sex marriage a decade ago. nyti.ms/3Ju2Ayd

November 10, 2025 at 2:51 PM

by Anna O. Law

12%

Scholar power: 12.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 65%, Political science 20%, Sociology 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Anna O. Law	20%	4	12.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

5.8 h

2

12.0%

Ranking score

0.043

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Anna O. Law

@unlawfulentries.bsky.social

Helpful review of past fed Indian law cases. "The Supreme Court, becoming known as a tribunal willing to overturn some of its major decisions, could only muster two votes on Monday to reconsider one of the most fiercely condemned rulings on the law governing America’s Indian tribes."

Lyle Denniston @lylden.bsky.social · 6h

One of the most reviled decisions by SCt on Indian law, the 1886 decision in US v. Kagama, withstands a challenge today. Only 2 JJ voted to hear it. SCt also refused to reconsider same-sex marriage precedent. Details at:
lyldenlawnews.com/2025/11/10/o...

November 10, 2025 at 11:38 PM