European brokers face AI turmoil

Reposted by Aija Leiponen, Daniel S. Goldberg, Rebecca Tushnet , and 7 more Aija Leiponen, Daniel S. Goldberg, Rebecca Tushnet, Lesley A. Hall, Felicity Callard, Gavin A. Schmidt, Michael W. Kraus, Meredith Farkas, James A. Benn, Elisa Freschi

34%

Scholar power: 34.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Aija Leiponen	37%	26	18.9%
🎓 Daniel S. Goldberg	21%	19	9.2%
🎓 Rebecca Tushnet	12%	14	4.5%
🎓 Lesley A. Hall	3%	20	1.3%
🎓 Felicity Callard	1%	35	0.6%
🎓 Gavin A. Schmidt	-	79	-
🎓 Michael W. Kraus	-	42	-
🎓 Meredith Farkas	-	7	-
🎓 James A. Benn	-	7	-
🎓 Elisa Freschi	-	7	-
Total			34.4%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

48.4 h

2258

34.4%

Ranking score

0.198

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Carl Quintanilla

@carlquintanilla.bsky.social

HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW: “.. In our in-progress research, we discovered that AI tools didn’t reduce work, they consistently intensified it.”

hbr.org/2026/02/ai-d...

February 10, 2026 at 1:17 PM

by Robert J. Shiller Reposted by Joshua Gans

206%

Scholar power: 206.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Robert J. Shiller	57%	109	178.5%
🎓 Joshua Gans	37%	56	27.7%
Total			206.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

47.3 h

47

206.2%

Ranking score

0.183

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Justin Wolfers

89%

Scholar power: 89.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Wolfers	39%	58	89.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

55.0%

48.8 h

184

89.1%

Ranking score

0.13

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Justin Wolfers

@justinwolfers.bsky.social

That little market freakout is a real mechanism: if AI makes it cheap to do what a vendor used to sell you, the vendor’s future profits fall—even as the rest of us get more productive.

February 10, 2026 at 12:52 PM

by Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose

97%

Scholar power: 97.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose	36%	82	97.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

28.9 h

0

97.8%

Ranking score

0.047

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Robert B. Reich

36%

Scholar power: 36.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Robert B. Reich	20%	37	36.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

64.9 h

586

36.5%

Ranking score

0.047

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Robert Reich

@rbreich.bsky.social

Notice a ton of commercials pushing AI during last night's Super Bowl?

Here's why these companies are so eager to get you to adopt it in your life (hint: it's a bubble). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wxBHxpMFXA

Brace Yourself for the AI Bubble

Are we watching an AI revolution, or a slow-motion economic disaster?

www.youtube.com

February 9, 2026 at 8:45 PM

by Justin Wolfers

89%

Scholar power: 89.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Wolfers	39%	58	89.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

47.9 h

14

89.1%

Ranking score

0.096

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Lionel Page

14%

Scholar power: 14.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Lionel Page	29%	25	14.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

63.4 h

638

14.5%

Ranking score

0.039

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Richard Baldwin

50%

Scholar power: 50.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Richard Baldwin	49%	108	50.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

62.9 h

22

50.9%

Ranking score

0.026

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Timothy D. McBride

33%

Scholar power: 33.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Timothy D. McBride	23%	23	33.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

57.0%

25.4 h

1

33.1%

Ranking score

0.024

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Timothy McBride

@mcbridetd.bsky.social

AI could transform the economy by year’s end www.vox.com/politics/478...

AI could transform the economy by year’s end

You just got more replaceable.

www.vox.com

February 11, 2026 at 12:20 PM

by Menzie Chinn

143%

Scholar power: 143.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Menzie Chinn	57%	70	143.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

64.0 h

4

143.1%

Ranking score

0.023

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Menzie Chinn

@mchinn.bsky.social

2025 announced layoffs: AI or DOGE? #EconSky
econbrowser.com/archives/202...

February 9, 2026 at 9:41 PM

by Mohamed A. El‐Erian

52%

Scholar power: 52.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mohamed A. El‐Erian	45%	15	52.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

48.7 h

30

52.3%

Ranking score

0.019

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mohamed A. El-Erian

@elerianm.bsky.social

... Some traders are simply hunting for better deals than the richly priced shares offered at home. Others are hoping to diversify out of major domestic indexes dominated by just a handful of names in the tech industry."

#markets #stocks #investing #investors

3 of 3

February 10, 2026 at 1:02 PM

Reposted by Anton Korinek

34%

Scholar power: 34.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Anton Korinek	54%	41	34.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

47.4 h

3

34.6%

Ranking score

0.018

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Matthew E. Kahn

81%

Scholar power: 81.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Matthew E. Kahn	37%	54	81.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

60.3 h

0

81.6%

Ranking score

0.016

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Mohamed A. El‐Erian

52%

Scholar power: 52.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mohamed A. El‐Erian	45%	15	52.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

47.9 h

41

52.3%

Ranking score

0.017

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mohamed A. El-Erian

@elerianm.bsky.social

... 0.4% forecast, and the “Control Group” contracting by -0.1% (versus the expected 0.4% gain).
This December cooling of retail sales underscores the importance of AI-related industrial and service sectors as drivers of growth.
#economy #retailsales #markets #growth

2 of 2

February 10, 2026 at 1:47 PM

by Daniela Gabor

81%

Scholar power: 81.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Daniela Gabor	52%	27	81.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

53.6 h

8

81.1%

Ranking score

0.015

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Daniela Gabor

@danielagabor.bsky.social

these corporate robots dont just write with AI, now they speak like AI bots

February 10, 2026 at 8:04 AM

by Paul Davies

23%

Scholar power: 23.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Paul Davies	25%	10	23.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

30.2 h

1

23.7%

Ranking score

0.011

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Paul J Davies

@pauljdavies.bsky.social

In our fully automated AI future money itself could be just a hollow prop so there’ll definitely be no point to banks or money managers and an industry that continually reinvents ways to earn fees will be gone.
@opinion.bloomberg.com
www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...

AI Threatens the Finance Industry's Perpetual Profit Machine

Artificial intelligence doesn’t only threaten to put herds of software businesses out to pasture. Anthropic PBC’s schooling of its Claude models in financial modelling has also sent a cold shiver down...

www.bloomberg.com

February 11, 2026 at 7:31 AM

by Naila Kabeer

38%

Scholar power: 38.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Naila Kabeer	17%	56	38.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

63.2 h

0

38.2%

Ranking score

0.007

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft

29%

Scholar power: 29.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft	35%	8	29.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

48.4 h

0

29.7%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

ZBW – Leibniz Informationszentrum Wirtschaft

@zbw-leibniz.bsky.social

Two-speed diffusion: Fast take-up, gradual deepening

VoxEU @ CEPR @voxeu.org · 3d

A survey of German firms shows over half of firms currently use generative AI or expect to use it by the end of the year. Firms expect productivity, wages, and demand for high-skilled workers to rise, with little change in low-skill employment.
E Falck & A Nagengast
cepr.org/voxeu/column...
#EconSky

Chart showing firms’ assessments of GenAI’s economic effects. Among adopters (and near-term adopters), productivity expectations are decisively positive. The share of (current or prospective) GenAI users expecting labour productivity to increase by at least 2% rises from 46% (2024) to 51% (2025) and 54% (2026); around one-quarter even expect gains of 5% or more, while only about 4–5% foresee productivity losses.

The novelty and speed of diffusion of generative AI means that evidence on its impact on productivity and the future of work is scarce. This column uses survey data from over 7,000 German firms to help address this gap. Over half of firms surveyed currently use generative AI or expect to use it by the end of the year, up from 26% in 2024. GenAI-related spending is expected to rise markedly from 2024 to 2026, but spending forecasts point to diminishing returns once easily scalable applications have been implemented. Firms expect productivity, wages, and demand for high-skilled workers to rise, with little change in low-skill employment.

February 10, 2026 at 1:16 PM

Reposted by Daniel Katz

7%

Scholar power: 7.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Daniel Katz	15%	28	7.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

65.9 h

25

7.9%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Daniel Katz

7%

Scholar power: 7.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Business 39%, Energy 11%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Daniel Katz	15%	28	7.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

59.3 h

27

7.9%

Ranking score

0.005

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Add to Home Screen

Light up
your news

European brokers face AI turmoil

Add to Home Screen

Light upyour news

European brokers face AI turmoil

Scholar power: 34.4%

Scholar power: 206.2%

Scholar power: 89.1%

Scholar power: 97.8%

Scholar power: 36.5%

Scholar power: 89.1%

Scholar power: 14.5%

Scholar power: 50.9%

Scholar power: 33.1%

Scholar power: 143.1%

Scholar power: 52.3%

Scholar power: 34.6%

Scholar power: 81.6%

Scholar power: 52.3%

Scholar power: 81.1%

Scholar power: 23.7%

Scholar power: 38.2%

Scholar power: 29.7%

Scholar power: 7.9%

Scholar power: 7.9%

Sign in to Lightnews

Sign up to start reading

Connect Bluesky

Connect with Bluesky

Light up
your news