US revokes EPA endangerment finding

Scholar power: 5.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Brooke Harrington	4%	19	5.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

19.3 h

0

5.2%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Brooke Harrington

@ebharrington.bsky.social

I think you've nailed it. The Trump policies of shoving AI down our throats while also depriving us of vaccines lines up perfectly with your analysis. Bonus: Trump removing Environmental Protection Agency laws, so that whomever isn't wiped out by disease will be taken out by pollution.

February 14, 2026 at 6:19 PM

by Michael E. Mann

50%

Scholar power: 50.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Michael E. Mann	16%	111	50.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

63.0%

20.4 h

57

50.6%

Ranking score

0.175

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Michael E. Mann

@michaelemann.bsky.social

I'll be talking about the Trump administration's repeal of the EPA "Endangerment Finding" and what it means for climate action in the U.S., tomorrow morning ~9:20am ET on The #WeatherChannel "Weekend Recharge"
www.weathergroup.com/shows/weeken...

February 14, 2026 at 5:17 PM

by Harvey J. Miller

6%

Scholar power: 6.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Harvey J. Miller	3%	50	6.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

64.0%

21.1 h

12

6.4%

Ranking score

0.025

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Harvey J. Miller

@mobileharv.bsky.social

Make this make sense. (Trick question; you can’t. Hint - the EPA is a Federal agency.)

“The final rule announced on Thursday argues that the 1970 Clean Air Act applies only to direct, localized pollution, whereas greenhouse gases spread far and wide and therefore aren’t subject to regulation.”

Trump Erased a Bedrock Climate Rule. Here Come the Lawsuits.

www.nytimes.com

February 14, 2026 at 4:31 PM

by Dana R. Fisher

21%

Scholar power: 21.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dana R. Fisher	12%	35	21.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

55.0%

22.4 h

3

21.3%

Ranking score

0.024

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Dana R. Fisher (aka the Apocalyptic Optimist)

@fisherdanar.bsky.social

Happy to contribute to this important story 👇

Marketplace @marketplace.org · 1d

The EPA says revoking the “endangerment finding” will save taxpayers over $1 trillion, but environmental policy experts disagree.

Plus: concierge medicine and AI weather forecasts.

Today on Marketplace.

Inside the "biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history"

The Environmental Protection Agency says revoking the “endangerment finding” will save taxpayers over $1 trillion, but environmental policy experts disagree. Plus: concierge medicine and AI weather fo...

www.marketplace.org

February 14, 2026 at 3:14 PM

by David Brady

17%

Scholar power: 17.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 David Brady	8%	54	17.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

22.7 h

0

17.6%

Ranking score

0.007

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

David Brady

@davebrady72.bsky.social

“In 2013, U.S. EPA officials became sick while inspecting the site. The federal investigators encountered puddles of crude oil on the facility grounds, as well as caustic fumes emanating from the facility, resulting in violations for air quality and other environmental infractions.”

February 14, 2026 at 2:56 PM

Reposted by Dawn J. Wright, Smith

13%

Scholar power: 13.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dawn J. Wright	16%	37	9.7%
🎓 Smith	10%	12	3.5%
Total			13.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

22.8 h

30

13.2%

Ranking score

0.018

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Liz Neeley

@lizneeley.bsky.social

Each Friday night, I cover what happened in US science & higher ed. 🧪

Year 2, Week 7: Feb 13
- EPA revokes authority to regulate emissions
- FDA refuses to review new flu vaccine
- NASA funding frozen
- NCAR stripped of supercomputing
- so much more (a rough week)
buttondown.com/liminalcreat...

Year 2, Week 7

Feb 7-13, 2026 - with a paddle

buttondown.com

February 14, 2026 at 2:53 PM

by Roger A. Pielke

44%

Scholar power: 44.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Roger A. Pielke	21%	49	44.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

23.5 h

0

44.1%

Ranking score

0.033

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Thomas Pogge

13%

Scholar power: 13.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Thomas Pogge	6%	58	13.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

63.0%

24.3 h

0

13.7%

Ranking score

0.015

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Thomas Pogge

@tpogge.bsky.social

From Inside Climate News.
The impact of Trump's policies on greenhouse gas emissions.

February 14, 2026 at 1:22 PM

by Dana R. Fisher

21%

Scholar power: 21.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dana R. Fisher	12%	35	21.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

77.0%

25.3 h

13

21.3%

Ranking score

0.058

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Dana R. Fisher (aka the Apocalyptic Optimist)

@fisherdanar.bsky.social

For my more comprehensive take on this foolish and very dangerous decision, see my latest here: danarfisher.com/2026/02/13/e...

Earth to Trump: You Can’t Cancel Climate Change

Yesterday, President Trump eliminated the endangerment finding that classified greenhouse gases as air pollutants. This finding was the basis for federal climate policy in the United States and mad…

danarfisher.com

February 14, 2026 at 12:21 PM

by Dana R. Fisher

21%

Scholar power: 21.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dana R. Fisher	12%	35	21.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

71.0%

25.4 h

68

21.3%

Ranking score

0.08

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Dana R. Fisher (aka the Apocalyptic Optimist)

@fisherdanar.bsky.social

I joined @marketplace.org to talk about the Trump Administration's revoking the endangerment finding that sets the basis for climate policy in the US and gave my favorite quote on the radio ever: "“I’m going to call B.S. on that. Like, I mean straight up B.S.” www.marketplace.org/story/2026/0...

The hidden costs of the EPA's new climate change policy

This week, the EPA revoked what’s called the “endangerment finding,” which found that fossil fuel emissions can endanger human health. The agency says the U.S. will save money, but there are other cos...

www.marketplace.org

February 14, 2026 at 12:17 PM

The Guardian

Trump’s repeal of landmark Obama-era climate rule: four key takeaways

Environmental groups say ‘cynical and devastating’ reversal of endangerment finding has grave implications The Trump administration has dismantled the basis for all US climate regulations, in its most confrontational anti-environment move yet. The 2009 endangerment finding determined that greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare and should therefore be controlled by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). By revoking it on Thursday, officials eliminated the legal foundation enabling the government to control planet-heating pollution. Continue reading. . .

Reposts 21 1d

by Christian Gollier Reposted by Lars P. Feld

11%

Scholar power: 11.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Christian Gollier	3%	57	6.8%
🎓 Lars P. Feld	6%	50	4.2%
Total			11.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

26.8 h

0

11.0%

Ranking score

0.01

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Jonathan Wolff

12%

Scholar power: 12.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jonathan Wolff	7%	33	12.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

29.6 h

2

12.1%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Jo Wolff

@jowolff.bsky.social

True. Was co-author once of a long paper in the Lancet making this argument. Managing the Health Effects of Climate Change, 2009.

February 14, 2026 at 8:01 AM

Der Spiegel

Donald Trump: What his anti-climate decision means for the economy

The US government no longer classifies many emissions as harmful to health. That should please industry. But it's not that simple

Reposts 2 1d

by Juan Cole

10%

Scholar power: 10.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Juan Cole	7%	24	10.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

70.0%

32.3 h

1

10.3%

Ranking score

0.014

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Juan Cole

@jricole.bsky.social

Serious Court Challenges May Reverse the Trump EPA’s Revocation of 2009 CO2 Endangerment Finding

The court found that various greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, were “pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act.

dlvr.it

February 14, 2026 at 5:20 AM

El Pais

Ante el retroceso de otros, lideremos la acción climática

Existe una mayoría de países convencidos de que el cambio climático es el gran desafío de nuestra era. España está dispuesta y en condiciones de liderar esa mayoría

Reposts 57 1d

by Emily Grubert

22%

Scholar power: 22.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Emily Grubert	15%	24	22.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

55.0%

35.0 h

26

22.0%

Ranking score

0.022

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Emily Grubert

@gruberte.bsky.social

I really need these headlines to stop being like IT’S ILLEGAL TO REGULATE GHGS NOW instead of what’s actually going on, which is that we’re no longer required to consider them in scope of a 56 year old law that didn’t contemplate climate change as an issue

February 14, 2026 at 2:38 AM

by James Goodwin

13%

Scholar power: 13.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 James Goodwin	9%	26	13.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

35.6 h

1

13.8%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

James Goodwin

@jamesgoodwin.bsky.social

Now, we all know that the Supreme Court has rejected any statutory interpretation argument against the Clean Air Act's definition of pollutant covering greenhouse gases. What this final preamble presupposes is maybe it didn't?

February 14, 2026 at 2:03 AM

Reposted by Dana R. Fisher

7%

Scholar power: 7.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dana R. Fisher	12%	35	7.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

55.0%

35.7 h

0

7.1%

Ranking score

0.003

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Marketplace

@marketplace.org

The EPA says revoking the “endangerment finding” will save taxpayers over $1 trillion, but environmental policy experts disagree.

Plus: concierge medicine and AI weather forecasts.

Today on Marketplace.

Inside the "biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history"

The Environmental Protection Agency says revoking the “endangerment finding” will save taxpayers over $1 trillion, but environmental policy experts disagree. Plus: concierge medicine and AI weather fo...

www.marketplace.org

February 14, 2026 at 2:00 AM

by James Goodwin

13%

Scholar power: 13.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 30%, Environmental science 30%, Public Health 15%, Political science 15%, Economics 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 James Goodwin	9%	26	13.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

35.9 h

3

13.8%

Ranking score

0.004

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

James Goodwin

@jamesgoodwin.bsky.social

Note industry demands that kind of evidence for health impacts from pollution reductions, which science often delivers. And even then, it's never good enough. Just a complete double standard.

February 14, 2026 at 1:44 AM

Add to Home Screen

Light up
your news

US revokes EPA endangerment finding

Trump’s repeal of landmark Obama-era climate rule: four key takeaways

Donald Trump: What his anti-climate decision means for the economy

Ante el retroceso de otros, lideremos la acción climática

Add to Home Screen

Light upyour news

US revokes EPA endangerment finding

Scholar power: 5.2%

Scholar power: 50.6%

Scholar power: 6.4%

Scholar power: 21.3%

Scholar power: 17.6%

Scholar power: 13.2%

Scholar power: 44.1%

Scholar power: 13.7%

Scholar power: 21.3%

Scholar power: 21.3%

Trump’s repeal of landmark Obama-era climate rule: four key takeaways

Scholar power: 11.0%

Scholar power: 12.1%

Donald Trump: What his anti-climate decision means for the economy

Scholar power: 10.3%

Ante el retroceso de otros, lideremos la acción climática

Scholar power: 22.0%

Scholar power: 13.8%

Scholar power: 7.1%

Scholar power: 13.8%

Sign in to Lightnews

Sign up to start reading

Connect Bluesky

Connect with Bluesky

Light up
your news