Scholar

Awais Aftab

H-index: 18
Psychology 39%
Philosophy 32%

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

ent3c.bsky.social
Haven't posted much lately-- busy. One of my Substack projects is republishing my chapters from the Kendler and Parnas series on the philosophy of psychiatry. The books are expensive and hard to find. This is, "The Hard Question in Psychiatric Nosology." /1 @awaisaftab.bsky.social
awaisaftab.bsky.social
Karl Jaspers Award is given for the best unpublished paper in the area of philosophy of psychiatry by a trainee in the disciplines of philosophy, psychiatry, or psychology.

Deadline for submission for 2025 Karl Jaspers Award is Sunday, December 7, 2025

aapp.press.jhu.edu/jaspers
AAPP logo

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

drrobertchapman.bsky.social
Experiences of transphobia over the past year have made me sometimes regret coming out as nonbinary for the first time. I've long received hatemail and death threats for being a public-ish trans person, but that wasn't so bad and it never made me regret being out. Things are getting so much worse.
awaisaftab.bsky.social
The link in my post should be a gift link as well (at least that’s what I think I posted!)
awaisaftab.bsky.social
Grateful to see this layered and multifaceted discussion in the @nytimes.com by @ellenbarry.bsky.social about recent work by @alanlevinovitz.bsky.social and me on the Rumpelstiltskin effect (the therapeutic relief experienced on receiving a diagnosis)

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/03/s...
Autism, A.D.H.D., Anxiety: Can a Diagnosis Make You Better?
www.nytimes.com
awaisaftab.bsky.social
Are We All Just Having 'Understandable Human Reactions'? — Jesse Meadows

“Sami Timimi's new book paints neurodivergent and trans people as dupes of neoliberalism”

www.sluggish.xyz/p/are-we-all...
Are We All Just Having 'Understandable Human Reactions'?
Sami Timimi's new book paints neurodivergent and trans people as dupes of neoliberalism
www.sluggish.xyz

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

nicolecrust.bsky.social
Really insightful (once again). Thank you for it. I appreciate your reframe on this topic, embracing neurodiversity while also explaining in a non-dismissive way the rationale behind those that opt for treatment.
castalia1981.bsky.social
I am very excited about the upcoming seventh edition of the Institute of Applied Psychology Interdisciplinary Series (IAPIS, ips.uj.edu.pl/nauka/iapis/... & @jagiellonskiuni.bsky.social)

To register for the first talk use: forms.gle/GcnHuj3rhamH...
awaisaftab.bsky.social
Reposting for the Monday crowd 👇🏽
awaisaftab.bsky.social
Rewriting the Grand Plan of Clinical Neuroscience

A Review of “Elusive Cures: Why Neuroscience Hasn’t Solved Brain Disorders—and How We Can Change That” by Nicole C. Rust ( @nicolecrust.bsky.social )

www.psychiatrymargins.com/p/rewriting-...
Rewriting the Grand Plan of Clinical Neuroscience
A Review of “Elusive Cures” by Nicole C. Rust
www.psychiatrymargins.com
lastpositivist.bsky.social
Just got an email from a scam academic journal asking if I wanted to "explore new advances in White Psychodrama" and it's just got me like: buddy, I can watch the news myself.

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

profrobhoward.bsky.social
BlueSky friends, forgive me for not posting much on here. I'm standing for President of the RCPsych in the elections next March. I'm still speaking and listening to friends and colleagues about what is important, but you can learn about what I would do if successful here: www.profrobhoward.com
ProfRobHoward
www.profrobhoward.com
awaisaftab.bsky.social
Rewriting the Grand Plan of Clinical Neuroscience

A Review of “Elusive Cures: Why Neuroscience Hasn’t Solved Brain Disorders—and How We Can Change That” by Nicole C. Rust ( @nicolecrust.bsky.social )

www.psychiatrymargins.com/p/rewriting-...
Rewriting the Grand Plan of Clinical Neuroscience
A Review of “Elusive Cures” by Nicole C. Rust
www.psychiatrymargins.com

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

appelbap.bsky.social
An excellent overview of laws on involuntary commitment of drug users. As I said, “Passing a law doesn’t create a system. Treatment of addiction is difficult and takes time. It is not something that’s going to be solved in 30 days.” www.nytimes.com/2025/09/17/h...
Can Drug Users Be Forced Into Rehab? Trump Says Yes. So Do 34 States.
www.nytimes.com

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

aidangcw.bsky.social
The perennial challenge for scientists: being honest with yourself about the limitations of your work but also remaining excited about it.

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

jonathanstea.bsky.social
I feel so honored that my book, Mind the Science, has won the 2024 Science Writers and Communicators of Canada Book Award.

And I’m grateful to those in the science communication community who, like me, are fighting the same mission against pseudoscience. 😊✌️

sciencewriters.ca/bookawards2024
awaisaftab.bsky.social
Reposting for the Monday crowd
awaisaftab.bsky.social
Why Has Critical Psychiatry Run Out of Steam?

What has critical psychiatry become when its gestures of suspicion are indistinguishable from the paranoid accusations of medicine’s most fraudulent enemies?

www.psychiatrymargins.com/p/why-has-cr...
Why Has Critical Psychiatry Run Out of Steam?
An adaptation of Bruno Latour’s famous essay
www.psychiatrymargins.com

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

psychunseen.bsky.social
FALSE is now available at Amazon for the insanely low price of $5.

That's cheaper than it would cost me to mail you a free copy.

No better time than now to pick one up and write a review!

www.amazon.com/dp/0197765270/

by Awais AftabReposted by: Awais Aftab

awaisaftab.bsky.social
Why Has Critical Psychiatry Run Out of Steam?

What has critical psychiatry become when its gestures of suspicion are indistinguishable from the paranoid accusations of medicine’s most fraudulent enemies?

www.psychiatrymargins.com/p/why-has-cr...
Why Has Critical Psychiatry Run Out of Steam?
An adaptation of Bruno Latour’s famous essay
www.psychiatrymargins.com

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

juliaehbrown.bsky.social
Excellent piece by @alanlevinovitz.bsky.social @awaisaftab.bsky.social on the therapeutic effect of diagnosis +
the need for qual research. Reading Parson’s “sick role” theory in undergrad sociology was the moment I realized how much is missed by psych models. www.cambridge.org/core/service...
www.cambridge.org

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

nicolecrust.bsky.social
“Species” is a lot like “emotion”: hard to define in ways that everything fits nicely + a long history of debate (including Darwin for both cases).

www.quantamagazine.org/why-is-it-so...

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

realadamhunt.bsky.social
🎉New pre-print!🎉

“Our findings represent the most robust evidence to date that evolutionary psychiatry offers normalising causal stories with various positive effects, in this case by casting anxiety as a calibrated defence system that can overshoot in contemporary contexts."

by Awais AftabReposted by: Awais Aftab

awaisaftab.bsky.social
First-Person Psychiatric Accounts: A Substack Collection

Personal accounts of mental health challenges and mental healthcare, many of which are among the most widely read and appreciated posts in Psychiatry at the Margins.

www.psychiatrymargins.com/p/first-pers...
First-Person Psychiatric Accounts
A Substack Collection
www.psychiatrymargins.com

Reposted by: Awais Aftab

nicolecrust.bsky.social
@awaisaftab.bsky.social did an excellent job with this revision of the APA statement. He's right; that statement is not an effective way to gain trust.

substack.com/home/post/p-...
Left: “IMPORTANT: Decades of rigorous research, randomized clinical trials, peer-reviewed studies, meta-analyses, national registry studies, and FDA oversight show that psychiatric medications are safe and effective. Medications like SSRIs can be lifesaving if they are taken as directed under the care of an appropriately licensed healthcare professional.

Right: What could a better statement have looked like? One that was trying to make some effort at repairing public trust?

Here’s my attempt:

Decades of rigorous research, randomized clinical trials, peer-reviewed studies, meta-analyses, national registry studies, and FDA oversight show that psychiatric medications are safe and effective. That is, when used for the right indications under the care of a qualified clinician, they are appropriate for clinical use based on standards that are applied across medicine, and the expected benefits render the expected risks acceptable to the average patient. This does not mean that psychiatric medications are risk-free, universally effective, or right for every person. Psychiatric medications allow many people to better manage their symptoms and live more functional lives; for some, the effects are transformative. Like all medications, they can also cause harm, including serious adverse effects in a minority. Some of these adverse effects, especially with long-term use, remain poorly studied. The public deserves access to psychiatric medications in a manner that pairs available evidence with person-centered care. Their use requires transparency about uncertainties, mechanisms, trade-offs, and alternatives. We support individuals and families making informed choices.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m