Scholar

Michael Morris

H-index: 14
Philosophy 41%
History 10%
samfr.bsky.social
If you want to win over younger voters, telling them they can't go to university is probably not going to help.
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
Wilmington Hill from by Bo-Peep chalk pit, two days ago
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
It doesn't seem to be stated explicitly, but I think the key thing is this: which type a verb is doesn't seem to depend on its surface form (the spelling or pronunciation of the present, e.g.).
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
A quick scout around suggests that there are basically two types of verb: those that change the vowel in the past tense (like 'grow'), and those which add 't' or 'ed' at the end (like 'glow'). I think the first is older, and there's a tendency to shift from the first to the second.
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
I'm afraid it's not specific to UCL, despite the presence of Bentham's body there. We had the same system at Sussex quite a few years ago. You're just lucky you were able to hold out so long.
jdportes.bsky.social
This detailed demolition of @gullyfoyleuk.bsky.social's "75 Brexit Benefits" by @alanbeattie.bsky.social deserves wider circulation.

Intellectual garbage disposal is a valuable public service!
alanbeattie.bsky.social
OK, let's take this seriously. I had an odd half an hour and via Apple Books had a quick look at the three claims I knew most about - two re the post-Brexit bilateral preferential trade agreements replicated from the EU versions and one about cheaper bananas. All are wrong or wildly implausible. 1/n
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
Ah, a place name? (And a contemporary philosopher?)
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
The Sarsen Stone, Flagstaff Point, September 2018
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
Not really by my reckoning, though he did write a life of Hobbes!
hhesterm.bsky.social
I would add one thing: we are bombarded with two claims: 1) the UK can leave the ECHR without lowering human rights protection and 2) the ECHR significantly limits what the government can do and hence the UK has to leave it.
These cannot both be true. /1
samfr.bsky.social
There are lots of reasons not to leave ECHR. But apart from anything else, it just doesn't solve the problem the Tories/Reform think it does.

E.g. the Supreme Court judgment re Rwanda being unsafe explicitly said it was not based on ECHR.
mbfazi.bsky.social
Thank you to The Royal Institute of Philosophy (@triphilosophy.bsky.social) and the department of Philosophy @sussex.ac.uk for the invitation to speak at this exciting event next week 🎙️💡🤖
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
Glynde Reach, the Ouse, and the sea, from Mount Caburn, October 2019
greenmirandahere.bsky.social
REMINDER: FT Schools provides free access to FT.com for 16-19 year olds and their teachers at schools around the world. More than 73,000 students in 132 countries are already reading us through the programme professional.ft.com/en-gb/servic...
professional.ft.com
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
Mount Caburn from Beddingham Hill, September 2015
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
Though I'm not really sure what kind of necessity is involved in Socratic claims!
michaelmorrisphil.bsky.social
... recalcitrant desires, e.g.. But that might be thought to take almost indefinite elenchtic testing to be sure of.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m