Reposted by: Elisa Freschi
#SanskritPhilosophy
2/
Q: Was the existence of Śaṅkara and/or his writings known in 10th c. Kashmir?
R by Walter Slaje:
"To my knowledge, Śaṅkara played no role in Kashmir at that time. Maṇḍana was seen as the representative of Advaita Vedānta
1
That they have always existed and that unless we have strong reasons against that, since we should start somewhere, we should trust the past to have been like the present.
Reposted by: Elisa Freschi
#Mīmāṃsā #Sanskrit
Reposted by: Elisa Freschi
2/
#Philosophy #philsky #SanskritPhilosophy
reasonably clear that the two theories [EF: intrinsic validity and transparency of cognitions] mutually imply one another
and are complementary, if not actually identical. To say that a
cognition is inherently valid is only to say that it is self-luminous."
1
Reposted by: Elisa Freschi
https://www.hsozkult.de/job/id/job-157782
Wien, 01.01.2026, Arbeitskräfteüberlassung, Bewerbungsschluss: 24.10.2025
Reposted by: Elisa Freschi
O-kay... That sounds like you are trying to argue for existence of a soul. Why have you never argued this for animals or other objects that didn't have multibillion dollar marketing campaigns?
Reposted by: Elisa Freschi
Yes we can. The way it makes mistakes is exactly indicative of nonconciousness.
Of a lack of any sense of comprehension of its inputs.
And of self awareness.
by Peter Adamson — Reposted by: Elisa Freschi, Peter Adamson
brill.com/display/titl...
3/
This means that if a cognition has the property of validity, then it has it intrinsically
2/
"47 It should be understood that the validity of every valid cognition is from itself. For, it is impossible for something else to produce [in it] a capacity that is not innately existent.
1/
#Philosophy #SanskritPhilosophy #philsky
"LLMs double the number of papers while keeping paper quality constant, that sounds good: more excellent philosophy research being done"
Is this really so? Can we assess philosophy through quantity of papers? Or through raising interest in Qs never asked?
4
2/
"Why would you ignore papers that use AI? Would you ignore a revolutionary mathematical proof because it was made by AI? Or a cancer drug because it was invented by AI?"
1/
3/
2/
by Elisa Freschi — Reposted by: Peter Adamson
1/ #Philosophy #philsky #SanskritPhilosophy