elisa freschi
@elisafreschi.bsky.social
3.2K followers 850 following 2.2K posts
Sanskrit (and) philosophy. Permanently in beta phase. Blogging at http://elisafreschi.com and http://indianphilosophyblog.org. Articles at http://academia.edu Here to learn & share
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by elisa freschi
elisafreschi.bsky.social
As so often, he tells a parable to illustrate his point (śilopākhyāna, VI.32511–40)."
#SanskritPhilosophy
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Significantly, the Mokṣopāya addresses and quotes Maṇḍana's theory of error (khyāti [Vibhramaviveka]) in Mokṣopāya VI.325.1–10 (the current volume), adopting "Vasiṣṭha's" inclusivistic approach by redefining the ātmakhyāti of the Yogācāra school in his own terms.
2/
elisafreschi.bsky.social
A discussion was started on "Indology", that might be relevant to ppl here.
Q: Was the existence of Śaṅkara and/or his writings known in 10th c. Kashmir?
R by Walter Slaje:
"To my knowledge, Śaṅkara played no role in Kashmir at that time. Maṇḍana was seen as the representative of Advaita Vedānta
1
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Neither nor.
That they have always existed and that unless we have strong reasons against that, since we should start somewhere, we should trust the past to have been like the present.
elisafreschi.bsky.social
#PhilosophyJobs
eltorosolo.bsky.social
Great city, great colleagues; if you fit the (quite flexible) profile, you should apply.
vayrynen.bsky.social
📣JOB ALERT📣
Lecturer or Associate Professor in Philosophy at University of Leeds. AOS: Social Philosophy + at least one of: Metaphysics, Epistemology, or Philosophy of Language, Logic, Mind, or Action. Details at jobs.leeds.ac.uk/Vacancy.aspx.... Closing date 5 Nov 2025. #philosophy 1/2
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Thanks for asking! The ṛṣis are just people who recited the Veda particularly well according to Mīmāṃsā authors. They did not "start" the Vedas.
elisafreschi.bsky.social
In order to safeguard the validity of the Veda, Mīmāṃsā authors relegate it to the domain of the ought only.
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Don’t forget the fundamental division between the is- and the ought-domains (Taber calls the latter “transcendent”, but I am not sure this translation is helpful). Sense-perception is the ultimate source for claims about the former, the Veda alone for claims about the latter.
#Mīmāṃsā #Sanskrit
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Mīmāṃsā authors explain that an author of the Veda would have been remembered, had they existed, given that the Vedas are so present in daily life (it's not like forgetting the maker of a well in an abandoned country, they say).
Reposted by elisa freschi
hsozkultservice.bsky.social
Job: 1 Historiker:in (m/w/d) (Parlament Österreich, Wien)

https://www.hsozkult.de/job/id/job-157782

Wien, 01.01.2026, Arbeitskräfteüberlassung, Bewerbungsschluss: 24.10.2025
www.hsozkult.de
elisafreschi.bsky.social
#PhilosophyJobs
roto-rub.bsky.social
📢 Come work in Bochum!
- 3 year PostDoc Position in an edition and research project on Ernst F. Apelt
- PhD in philosophy or history of science and very good German language skills required
- PI: Prof. Helmut Pulte
- Deadline: 6.10.25
All information here: jobs.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/jobposting/d...
Wissenschaftliche*n Mitarbeiter*in (m/w/d) in einem Editionsprojekt
jobs.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
elisafreschi.bsky.social
This is historically wrong (the upholders of luminosity were parataḥprāmāṇyavādins!) and the "It seems reasonably clear" puts the audience under the impression that it has been proven, whereas it has not.
2/
#Philosophy #philsky #SanskritPhilosophy
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Shri Krishna Saksena writes "It seems
reasonably clear that the two theories [EF: intrinsic validity and transparency of cognitions] mutually imply one another
and are complementary, if not actually identical. To say that a
cognition is inherently valid is only to say that it is self-luminous."
1
Reposted by elisa freschi
oxinabox.bsky.social
"it might be conscious but unable to express it! You can't know."
O-kay... That sounds like you are trying to argue for existence of a soul. Why have you never argued this for animals or other objects that didn't have multibillion dollar marketing campaigns?
Reposted by elisa freschi
oxinabox.bsky.social
Part of same thing "it seems like in humans consciousness just appeared when sufficiently complex systems. So you can't rule it out for LLMs"

Yes we can. The way it makes mistakes is exactly indicative of nonconciousness.
Of a lack of any sense of comprehension of its inputs.
And of self awareness.
Reposted by elisa freschi
histphilosophy.bsky.social
Miira Tuominen and I edited this new book from Brill with no fewer than 25 chapters on various aspects of ancient and medieval philosophy in Greek, Arabic, and Latin texts. Actually there's a little Persian in there too.

brill.com/display/titl...
Animals in Greek, Arabic, and Latin Philosophy
"Animals in Greek, Arabic, and Latin Philosophy" published on 29 Sep 2025 by Brill.
brill.com
elisafreschi.bsky.social
—>But don’t we then have a problem with invalidity? Should not the same apply to it? No, because invalidity is not a property, it is the lack of a property. Hence, it does not need a specific cause.
3/
elisafreschi.bsky.social
48 For [it is true that] entities may require their causes to acquire their existence [i.e. to come into being]. But once they get their existence, they operate towards their own work just spontaneously."
This means that if a cognition has the property of validity, then it has it intrinsically
2/
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Kumārila on intrinsic validity (ad 1.1.2):
"47 It should be understood that the validity of every valid cognition is from itself. For, it is impossible for something else to produce [in it] a capacity that is not innately existent.
1/
#Philosophy #SanskritPhilosophy #philsky
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Again from the comments, by David Wallace:
"LLMs double the number of papers while keeping paper quality constant, that sounds good: more excellent philosophy research being done"
Is this really so? Can we assess philosophy through quantity of papers? Or through raising interest in Qs never asked?
4
Reposted by elisa freschi
ingwarpero.bsky.social
...seit Jahren Tempo 30 aus, baut Straßen um und v.a. baut Fußgängerzonen und sichere Fahrradwege immer weiter aus. Was für eine Erfolgsgeschichte und der Beweis, wie leicht Verkehrstote zu verhindern sind, wenn der politische Wille da ist. Diesen Willen brauchen wir in 🇩🇪 jetzt endlich auch! (2/2)
elisafreschi.bsky.social
Interesting, bc I think that philosophy and drug research are fundamentally different, most of all bc the latter is results-driven, whereas the former is valuable insofar as it can keep itself questions-driven.
2/