Scholar

Nina Jankowicz

Videos

Nina Jankowicz is an American researcher and writer. She is the author of How to Lose the Information War (2020),… more

Nina Jankowicz
H-index: 3
Political science 80%
Sociology 20%

Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz, David H. Kaye, Henry Farrell

dwj88.bsky.social
A secret meeting with X. A senior State Dept. advisor just out of college. The VP's speech in Munich. Pressure on European regulators.

What do they share? They're all part of an agenda to turn the transatlantic alliance into a far right international:

www.techpolicy.press/trumps-state...
Trump’s State Department Wants to Use Tech Policy to Remake Europe In Its Image | TechPolicy.Press
Tech policy is a key part of the Trump administration's dramatic project to replace the US's traditional European alliances, Dean Jackson writes.
www.techpolicy.press
2 91 150

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Appreciate that and you! 🙏
1

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Hey, thanks so much for this for this- Ben was getting a very generic screen on the interface that just said “these ads ran without a disclaimer”— see below—the filter you used was not present in his interface. I’m taking down these posts and we’re looking into it
1

by Nina Jankowicz

View post

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Not really. Political advertising is an important way for little-known candidates to increase name recognition and reach their constituents. If regulated and transparent, online advertising can be an equalizer. We have a bad view of it because it hasn't been transparent and has been abused
1 1

by Nina Jankowicz

View post

by Nina Jankowicz

View post

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Happy Taylor Swift Day to all who celebrate ✨
2 5 75

Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz, Eric Goldman, Daniel W. Drezner , and 4 more

esqueer.net
This was done at the direction of Pam Bondi. The US government is now dictating what apps you can have on your phone.

The underlying threat here is if Apple didn't comply, they'd slap billions in tariffs on Apple products.
Alt text: Screenshot of a Fox News Digital article reporting that Apple removed the ICEBlock tracking app from its App Store after the Department of Justice raised safety concerns. The article states DOJ officials, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, asked Apple to take down the app, claiming it endangered law enforcement officers and shielded illegal immigrants. Bondi confirmed the removal in a statement, saying ICEBlock put ICE agents at risk and emphasized DOJ’s commitment to protecting federal officers.
51 560 1.4K

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Fucking terrifying.

Especially as a woman, especially as someone who has been threatened by violent individuals online for 3+ years.

A responsible administration would be addressing this as a matter of urgency, but the Trump administration *want us* to live in fear.
cnn.com
CNN @cnn.com · 5d
A CNN review has found two dozen incidents of people posing as ICE officers in 2025 – more incidents than during the prior four presidential terms combined.
ICE impersonator incidents rise during Trump’s second term | CNN
A CNN review has found two dozen incidents of people posing as ICE officers in 2025 – more incidents than during the prior four presidential terms combined.
www.cnn.com
5 61 130

Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz

cnn.com
A CNN review has found two dozen incidents of people posing as ICE officers in 2025 – more incidents than during the prior four presidential terms combined.
ICE impersonator incidents rise during Trump’s second term | CNN
A CNN review has found two dozen incidents of people posing as ICE officers in 2025 – more incidents than during the prior four presidential terms combined.
www.cnn.com
57 460 780

Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz

mmasnick.bsky.social
I am so happy that I will be on an airplane (probably with no internet access) while this is happening because... this is going to be so fucking stupid (starting with the fact that Cruz's report seems to have some difficulty recognizing that someone other than Biden was president from 2018-2020).
Shut Your App: How Uncle Sam Jawboned Big Tech Into Silencing Americans October 1, 2025 Chairman Cruz Announces Full Committee Hearing on October 8th at 10:00 AM EST WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, will convene a full committee hearing titled “Shut Your App: How Uncle Sam Jawboned Big Tech Into Silencing Americans” on Wednesday, October 8, 2025 at 10:00 AM EST. The hearing will examine how government agencies have used tactics to pressure Big Tech into censoring speech protected by the First Amendment, a practice known as “jawboning.” The hearing will expand upon the themes in Sen. Cruz’s recently released report on a censorship campaign conducted in secret by the Biden administration’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). The report demonstrates that the agency infringed on the First Amendment by pressuring social media companies to censor Americans that held views different than the Biden administration. CISA faced little pushback from the tech industry or the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General, enabling the agency to avoid accountability. Sen. Cruz warns that CISA’s unchecked censorship serves as a cautionary tale for future policy related to artificial intelligence, a new medium to share and receive information, and one that progressives across the world are already trying to control. The hearing will explore legislative solutions to safeguard Americans from jawboning. Upon announcing the hearing, Sen. Cruz said: Witnesses: Mr. Eugene Volokh, Senior Fellow, Hoover Institute, Stanford University and Gary T. Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus, University of California, Los Angeles Mr. Alex Berenson, Independent Journalist and Author Mr. Sean Davis, Chief Executive Officer, The Federalist An additional witness may be announced at a later date.
13 43 310

by Stephan Lewandowsky — Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz

lewan.bsky.social
The amazing @ninajankowicz.com does a deep dive into the machinations of the Jim Jordan reality-inversion machine which recently claimed that Tech Giants were pressured by Biden admin into "censorship." They weren't. And they said so in front of Jordan's committee:
Jim Jordan Claims Google Censored Conservatives. His Own Committee’s Work Shows Otherwise.
Google execs’ interviews before the House Judiciary Committee show no evidence of “censorship” or government coercion - so who’s lying?
wiczipedia.substack.com
1 14 42

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Proud to have signed this important letter to get Mario Guevara free.

“To treat his case as a matter of immigration enforcement is to obscure the essential truth: Mario Guevara is being punished for his reporting.”

pen.org/press-releas...
Detention of Reporter Mario Guevara Sparks Outcry from Writers, Journalists, and Scholars
Renowned writers and journalists sign on to a letter decrying the detention of journalist Mario Guevara who has been in ICE custody 100 days.
pen.org
25 76

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
👆🏻 👆🏻 👆🏻
1

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
ICYMI, I spent over a dozen hours reading through Google’s interview transcripts that prove Jim Jordan is lying.

It’s worth actually reading the piece to understand the total lack of compunction at play here.

Pls click thru, read, and ❤️

open.substack.com/pub/wicziped...
2 38 120

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Annnnnnd now this. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/29/t...

Google is totally complicit in laundering this totally BS narrative 🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓
9 40 130

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Because people are litigious and I can't afford to be sued. they do it enough with no reason to, I don't want to give them one.

I use the L word plenty of times in the piece, and I've been plenty blunt throughout my career.
1

Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz

billadair.com
Smart and thorough analysis from @ninajankowicz.com: Jim Jordan Claims Google Censored Conservatives. His Own Committee’s Work Shows Otherwise. wiczipedia.substack.com/p/jim-jordan...
Jim Jordan Claims Google Censored Conservatives. His Own Committee’s Work Shows Otherwise.
Google execs’ interviews before the House Judiciary Committee show no evidence of “censorship” or government coercion - so who’s lying?
wiczipedia.substack.com
3 11 32

by Nina Jankowicz — Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Remember how Jim Jordan was celebrating last week, claiming Google had censored conservatives and his committee uncovered it?

Well, his own committee's documents show he's lying.

open.substack.com/pub/wicziped...
Jim Jordan Claims Google Censored Conservatives. His Own Committee’s Work Shows Otherwise.
Google execs’ interviews before the House Judiciary Committee show no evidence of “censorship” or government coercion - so who’s lying?
open.substack.com
33 260 800

by Nina Jankowicz

Substack
Jim Jordan Claims Google Censored Conservatives. His Own Committee’s Work Shows Otherwise.

Google execs’ interviews before the House Judiciary Committee show no evidence of “censorship” or government coercion - so who’s lying? For the past three years, Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) has used his position as Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee to harass researchers, government employees, and social media platform staff…

Reposts 0 8d

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
It’s Substack, not Amazon :) so I think it’s probably #70
2

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Pretty sure this is equivalent to when Amazon tells you you’re a bestseller in a random niche category, but I’ll take it 💁🏻‍♀️

Subscribe ⬇️

open.substack.com/pub/wiczipedia
2 4 77

Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz, Brendan Nyhan, Tom Clark , and 11 more

mford.bsky.social
Supreme Court rules 6-3 that congressional appropriations are optional: www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
On September 3, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a preliminary injunction directing the Executive to obligate roughly $10.5 billion of appropriated aid funding set to expire on September 30. Of that $10.5 billion, $4 billion was proposed to be rescinded in a “special message” transmitted pursuant to the Impoundment Control Act. See 2 U. S. C. §681 et seq. After the District Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied stays of that order, the Government filed this application to stay the District Court’s injunction. The application for stay presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court is granted. The Government, at this early stage, has made a sufficient showing that the Impoundment Control Act precludes respondents’ suit, brought pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, to enforce the appropriations at issue here. The Government has also made a sufficient showing that mandamus relief is unavailable to respondents. And, on the record before the Court, the asserted harms to the Executive’s conduct of foreign affairs appear to outweigh the potential harm faced by respondents. This order should not be read as a final determination on the merits. The relief granted by the Court today reflects our preliminary view, consistent with the standards for interim relief.
270 830 2.1K

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
Or Elon Musk, for that matter.
1

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
In Russia in the 90s Putin imprisoned the oligarchs who put a toe out of line. Only those who supported him, whom he could control, were allowed to continue making and using their money.
atrupar.com
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 12d
Trump on who he wants investigated: "Soros is a name certainly that I keep hearing. I don't know. I hear a lot of different names. I hear names of some pretty rich people that are radical left people. Maybe I hear about a guy named Reid Hoffman."
3 51 150

Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz, Guy Grossman, David R. Miller , and 1 more

leahlitman.bsky.social
in a sane world, this would be an impeachable offense & articles of impeachment would be drawn up tomorrow.

just as Jimmy Kimmel’s case wasn’t about Jimmy Kimmel - but about state sanctioned censorship - the Jim Comey case isn’t about Jim Comey. It’s about the rule of law versus authoritarianism.
16 140 730

Reposted by: Nina Jankowicz, Daniel W. Drezner, Robert C. Richards , and 3 more

atrupar.com
Trump on who he wants investigated: "Soros is a name certainly that I keep hearing. I don't know. I hear a lot of different names. I hear names of some pretty rich people that are radical left people. Maybe I hear about a guy named Reid Hoffman."
280 250 970

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
““Free speech culture” tells people they’re wrong and illiberal to notice that people using government force to censor them were previously calling them illiberal and censorial.”
8 43

by Nina Jankowicz

ninajankowicz.com
“”Free speech culture” tells students that free speech means someone can come to their campus and say bigoted and evil things and that’s good, and that their remedy is more speech, but if they use that speech the wrong way, that’s bad.”
kenwhite.bsky.social
Plenary Popehat Power @kenwhite.bsky.social · 16d
www.popehat.com/p/how-free-s...
How "Free Speech Culture" Is Killing Free Speech: Part One
Blurring The Lines Between Official Censorship And Individual Criticism Built The Intellectual Foundation For Trump's Assault On Free Expression
www.popehat.com
2 16 81

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m