Scholar

Robert M. Ross

H-index: 42
Environmental science 27%
Psychology 19%

by Robert M. RossReposted by: Robert M. Ross

robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Is there a relationship between delusional ideation and a jumping to conclusions cognitive bias? Our new meta-analysis led by Rose Doherty (wisely not on social media) syntheses evidence from 42 studies and finds... nothing! First publication from her PhD research 🎉

Reposted by: Robert M. Ross

willemsleegers.bsky.social
It's finally out! Our large-scaled replication attempt of the induced compliance paradigm in the study of cognitive dissonance:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
A Multilab Replication of the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance

Reposted by: Robert M. Ross

robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Response to commentaries on our recently published multisite study that failed to find evidence for cognitive dissonance theory (led by @willemsleegers.bsky.social and @vaidis.bsky.social) journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10....

Reposted by: Robert M. Ross

wchiggins.bsky.social
Introducing Dr Wendy Higgins and the Reading the Mammal in the Eyes Test.
omidghasemi.bsky.social
Our recently published paper in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review on #reasoning styles and #belief in God is now featured by @psychonomicsociety.bsky.social!
Thanks, Jonathan Caballero, for the interesting article.

📄 Read the paper here: doi.org/10.3758/s134...
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
I had hoped AI could unlock the secrets of the universe. Sadly, I was wrong...
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Wendy Higgins recently joined BlueSky (@wchiggins.bsky.social) and was awarded her PhD! Follow her for more cutting edge developments in psychological measurement, including measurement of ToM 🙂
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
For the full story see this summary by the leader of the research project @willgervais.com
bsky.app/profile/will...
willgervais.com
🚨New Paper Klaxon 🚨

Belief in Belief: Even Atheists in Secular Countries Show Intuitive Preferences Favoring Religious Belief.

Now out at PNAS

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

Here's a quick 🧵 on what we did and found!👇

1/ 11
🧪
#atheism
#religion
#culture
#evolution
Belief in belief: Even atheists in secular countries show intuitive preferences favoring religious belief | PNAS
We find evidence of belief in belief—intuitive preferences for religious belief over atheism, even among atheist participants—across eight comparat...
www.pnas.org

Reposted by: Robert M. Ross

markalfano.bsky.social
new preprint available!

Trust from Mistrust: When is Trust Rationally Justified?

Co-authors @michalk.bsky.social @stevebland.bsky.social @robert-m-ross.bsky.social

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Drawing on insights from Nietzsche's Human All-too-human, we develop a framework for wisely placing trust 🧵
OSF
osf.io
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Thanks. You're right! I failed to notice these stats on the researcher profile. I agree that this is much less neat (and useful) than publons was -- all this blah (which duplicates Google Scholar profiles and the Pure blah) detracts from the single piece of information that is very useful. Sigh.
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Wendy Higgins (@wchiggins.bsky.social), who developed all these projects that interrogated the validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test, has just been awarded her PhD and joined BlueSky! Follow her for more cutting-edge research on measurement and meta-science!
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Have you every found yourself wondering whether the most widely used measures of social cognitive ability measure what they are supposed to measure?
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Dr Wendy Higgins, who developed several brilliant projects that interrogated the validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test, has been awarded her PhD and joined BlueSky! Follow her for cutting-edge research on measurement and meta-science as she begins the next stage of her academic carer! 😀
wchiggins.bsky.social
Introducing Dr Wendy Higgins and the Reading the Mammal in the Eyes Test.
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
If it's totally dead I guess it's a "failed attempt" to reward peer review?
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Is Publons defunct? It got bought by Clarivate Analytics several years ago (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publons). When I dig around on their webpage attempting to access it I go round in circles. I was thinking of mentioning it in a metascience paper as an example of an attempt to reward peer review.
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Thanks! Lion's share of the credit for this work goes to Wendy Higgins!
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Encourage your students to take up the baton and examine more social cognitive measures please 🙂
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
I reckon a process of elimination is the best approach. There are typically two absurd responses and then it's a coin toss to identify the "correct" response.
robert-m-ross.bsky.social
Thanks! We're hoping that understatement could be a good approach to winning over the research community. Could be wrong though 🙃

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m