Jeremy Freese
@jeremyfreese.bsky.social
3.2K followers 410 following 130 posts

Social scientist at Stanford

Jeremy Jay Freese is an American sociologist and author.

Source: Wikipedia
Psychology 22%
Sociology 18%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
Given the return of blue books in higher education, why not?

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
I see this “If there’s money for a parade, there’s money for Medicaid!” slogan, and, while I appreciate the sentiment, logically it feels equivalent to “If you can afford a pet, you can afford a jet!”

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
Hard numbers on the Bluesky death spiral.
cooperlund.online
(It’s also probably an issue that we’ve gone from 1.8 to 1.3 million users in like two months if you’re trying to take the long view on setting up an account)

Reposted by Jeremy Freese

cooperlund.online
(It’s also probably an issue that we’ve gone from 1.8 to 1.3 million users in like two months if you’re trying to take the long view on setting up an account)

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
The hounds have been released at the annual Hoppin’ Hounds Easter Treat Hunt.

Reposted by Jeremy Freese

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
No greater condescension.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
These are precisely the times when it is most important to share the gummi bears with others.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
Yeah, but I think university policy could address that. Like it could formalize that a 2 hour exam slot means an exam that reasonably could be expected to be finished by most students in less than 1 hour.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
If trends continue, it won’t be that long until the proportion of students with disability accommodations at schools like Stanford passes 50%. I feel like when it does the school should just shift to formally assuming the most common accommodations are universal.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
If you have a loved one and a PS5, I cannot recommend Split Fiction highly enough if you want a fun distraction from everything else. (Does not require significant thumb capital to play successfully.)

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
The opposite. The US President forced Canada to take part of the US that was all toxic waste.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
The third talk should have been “Who will pay for the drinks and reception of the future?”

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
Sure, a lot of bad stuff going on so it’s fortunate that I’m still riding this high from a couple days ago.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
Huh. I’ve had two that I can recall done by my host as part of the intro for talks I have given. (One was in Canada, tho.)

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
Thanks. They’ve also seemed commonplace at local theater performances here in the Bay Area.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
“Three or four land acknowledgements in ten years”? Huh. Is that others’ experience? Whether Bay Area or academia, I certainly have experienced them far more than that.
jamellebouie.net
i’m sorry, i’m tired of this shit. there was no pronoun policing. i have encountered exactly three or four land acknowledgments in like ten years, and the most you’ll hear about “intersectionality” is in liberal nonprofits. this is just freefloating resentment masquerading as analysis.
ericmgarcia.bsky.social
Elissa Slotkin told Tim Alberta why her response to Trump's joint address did not touch on a laundry list of priorities from various advocacy groups.
www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...

Reposted by Jeremy Freese

jamellebouie.net
i’m sorry, i’m tired of this shit. there was no pronoun policing. i have encountered exactly three or four land acknowledgments in like ten years, and the most you’ll hear about “intersectionality” is in liberal nonprofits. this is just freefloating resentment masquerading as analysis.
ericmgarcia.bsky.social
Elissa Slotkin told Tim Alberta why her response to Trump's joint address did not touch on a laundry list of priorities from various advocacy groups.
www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
None of this would seem a revolutionary approach to rhetoric. Still, it was fraught with risk all the same: Democrats “have been on their heels since the election,” Slotkin told me, and the party faithful have been agitating since January 20 for someone, anyone, to stand up to Trump. The announcement of Slotkin had already been met with grumbling from progressives online; anything short of oratorical firebolts would confirm the complacent, feckless approach of the D.C. governing class.

Slotkin viewed the stakes somewhat differently: This speech could, at least symbolically, commence a new chapter of Democratic Party opposition to a president whose success is inextricable from the tone-deaf ineptitude of Democratic Party opposition. If her team’s resistance to Trump’s first term was marked by hysteria and hashtags—all the land acknowledgments and pronoun policing and intersectionality initiatives—Slotkin saw last night the opportunity to set a different tone.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
This is great. Thanks for writing it.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
Yeah, it is too overwhelming.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
Finally exasperated enough by Google’s search engine that i am going to give going all-in on DuckDuckGo a whirl for awhile.

jeremyfreese.bsky.social
This is not a time for weakness. Looking at the theme when you do the NYT’s Strands puzzle is weakness. Be strong.