alexandercoppock.com
Persuasion in Parallel: https://alexandercoppock.com/coppock_2022.html
Research Design: Declaration, Diagnosis, and Redesign: book.declaredesign.org
It doesn't replicate in new research. It just doesn't work.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
It doesn't replicate in new research. It just doesn't work.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Today on VoxDev w/ @priyadarshi-amar.bsky.social (@uc3m.es @ic3jm.bsky.social), @sumitra.bsky.social (@ausis.bsky.social), @simonchauchard.bsky.social & Florian Sichart (@princetonpolitics.bsky.social): voxdev.org/topic/educat...
Here's my best-performing SO question.
stackoverflow.com/questions/28...
Here's my best-performing SO question.
stackoverflow.com/questions/28...
Reducing Gender Gaps in Political Participation with Efficacy Promotion: Evidence from a Civic Education Experiment in Zambia - https://cup.org/4q7MBpt
- @gmcclendon.bsky.social, Elizabeth Sperb & O’Brien Kaaba
#OpenAccess
has anyone here recently run a conjoint experiment on surveyCTO? our programmer is having problems and could use some advice, ty!!
2023: 40% design-based, 40% model-based, 20% other, among quantitative studies aimed at "explanation" which I understand to mean causal inference.
Where we will be in 2043?
2023: 40% design-based, 40% model-based, 20% other, among quantitative studies aimed at "explanation" which I understand to mean causal inference.
Where we will be in 2043?
Haters gonna hate, sure, but more hate makes them hate more!
In a platform-independent field experiment, we show that reranking content expressing antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity in social media feeds alters affective polarization.
🧵
Haters gonna hate, sure, but more hate makes them hate more!
At table 5, they start controlling for post-treatment variables and drawing unsupported conclusions about mechanisms.
Remove to improve!
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10....
At table 5, they start controlling for post-treatment variables and drawing unsupported conclusions about mechanisms.
Remove to improve!
We now have enough studies of populist messages for a meta-analysis (papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....); maybe soon we'll be able to do the same for anti-corruption?
We now have enough studies of populist messages for a meta-analysis (papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....); maybe soon we'll be able to do the same for anti-corruption?
Had fun reconstructing the data from this 90-year old persuasion experiment that shows that "wet" and "dry" college students update their attitudes in the direction of counterattitudinal persuasive information.
paper: doi.org/10.1080/0022...
Had fun reconstructing the data from this 90-year old persuasion experiment that shows that "wet" and "dry" college students update their attitudes in the direction of counterattitudinal persuasive information.
paper: doi.org/10.1080/0022...
This is a "one condition" study (no causal inference) but hoo boy the descriptives...
www.tiktok.com/@nikalie.mon...
This is a "one condition" study (no causal inference) but hoo boy the descriptives...
www.tiktok.com/@nikalie.mon...
I think the response to this good point from @anatosaurus.bsky.social is not to abandon survey exps but instead to measure "getting heard" (attention) also.
I think the response to this good point from @anatosaurus.bsky.social is not to abandon survey exps but instead to measure "getting heard" (attention) also.
It all started because of a PNAS paper that claimed that the noun form it increased voter turnout (relative to the verb form ) by 11 to 14 percentage points.
It keeps not replicating, obviously.
Most recently doi.org/10.1017/bpp....
It all started because of a PNAS paper that claimed that the noun form it increased voter turnout (relative to the verb form ) by 11 to 14 percentage points.
It keeps not replicating, obviously.
Most recently doi.org/10.1017/bpp....
This month we heard back from 21 of 32 author teams on first email, all responses "yes" or "soon." (nice!)
Innovation: asking authors to post data publicly rather than privately with us via email (4 did, more will!)
This month we heard back from 21 of 32 author teams on first email, all responses "yes" or "soon." (nice!)
Innovation: asking authors to post data publicly rather than privately with us via email (4 did, more will!)
Researchers often defend suboptimal practices by referring to future studies with better designs.
But: Why would anybody run those studies when you can just throw a bunch of variables into a regression and make sweeping "preliminary" claims?
Collective Delusion In The Social Sciences: Publishing Incentives For Empirical Abuse
doi.org/10.1111/j.15...
Collective Delusion In The Social Sciences: Publishing Incentives For Empirical Abuse
doi.org/10.1111/j.15...
APSA is happy to announce that Chloe Thurston, Associate Professor of Political Science and Mary McGrath are joining the Perspectives on Politics editorial team as Associate Editors in American…
No effect on tax policy tho! here again we see fx on "target attitudes" not "nontarget"
academic.oup.com/isq/article/...
No effect on tax policy tho! here again we see fx on "target attitudes" not "nontarget"
The speakers appear to be Bluesky-less, but I'll tag the moderator @mattgraham.bsky.social!
Free for students and AAPOR members, $5 for others. Sign up here: www.eventbrite.com/e/the-rare-t...
The speakers appear to be Bluesky-less, but I'll tag the moderator @mattgraham.bsky.social!
doi.org/10.1017/bpp....
377 ests in 77 exps: edutainment moves attitudes, norms, beliefs 📊
Effects persist ⏳
Many reasonable theories about effect heterogeneity are not supported 😇
doi.org/10.1017/bpp....
377 ests in 77 exps: edutainment moves attitudes, norms, beliefs 📊
Effects persist ⏳
Many reasonable theories about effect heterogeneity are not supported 😇