Alex Coppock
aecoppock.bsky.social
Alex Coppock
@aecoppock.bsky.social
Associate Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University
alexandercoppock.com
Persuasion in Parallel: https://alexandercoppock.com/coppock_2022.html
Research Design: Declaration, Diagnosis, and Redesign: book.declaredesign.org
Reposted by Alex Coppock
The section is searching for new editors for @jepsjournal.bsky.social ! Please check out the call here, and circulate widely: connect.apsanet.org/s42/editor-s...
Editor Search
connect.apsanet.org
January 21, 2026 at 5:29 PM
Reposted by Alex Coppock
I need everyone in the political communications world who found the moral foundations reframing approach promising (which includes me) to read this paper

It doesn't replicate in new research. It just doesn't work.

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
The Poverty of Moral Foundation Messaging
Prominent scholars have argued that reframing political positions and issues in terms of moral foundations that appeal to conservatives or liberals can attract more individual-level support for tho...
www.tandfonline.com
January 8, 2026 at 3:53 PM
Reposted by Alex Coppock
new vox dev piece on our recent RCT to counter misinformation in classrooms in india:
January 7, 2026 at 1:58 PM
RIP. Learned so much from this community.

Here's my best-performing SO question.

stackoverflow.com/questions/28...
January 4, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Reposted by Alex Coppock
Coauthors Liz Sperber, O’Brien Kaaba and I have published 3 papers about youth civic ed and political participation, based on a WhatsApp experiment and a prior in-person pilot conducted in collaboration w/ Caritas Zambia CCMG Zambia @poverty-action.bsky.social and United Council of Churches Zambia
NEW -

Reducing Gender Gaps in Political Participation with Efficacy Promotion: Evidence from a Civic Education Experiment in Zambia - https://cup.org/4q7MBpt

- @gmcclendon.bsky.social, Elizabeth Sperb & O’Brien Kaaba

#OpenAccess
December 29, 2025 at 9:43 PM
signal boost!
hi polisci friends!

has anyone here recently run a conjoint experiment on surveyCTO? our programmer is having problems and could use some advice, ty!!
December 16, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Thanks to the authors for compiling this information; this view on our science is truly fascinating.

2023: 40% design-based, 40% model-based, 20% other, among quantitative studies aimed at "explanation" which I understand to mean causal inference.

Where we will be in 2043?
December 2, 2025 at 9:54 PM
amazing technical feat and confirmation of a long-standing but tough-to-demonstrate prediction that exposure to online partisan animosity causes decreases in out-party warmth.

Haters gonna hate, sure, but more hate makes them hate more!
New paper in Science:

In a platform-independent field experiment, we show that reranking content expressing antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity in social media feeds alters affective polarization.

🧵
December 1, 2025 at 6:46 PM
This paper is great up through table 4 -- very nice RCT evidence that free gym increases exercise and course completion.

At table 5, they start controlling for post-treatment variables and drawing unsupported conclusions about mechanisms.

Remove to improve!
University students who were provided with a free gym card (in a randomized experiment) exercised more and had a significant improvement in academic performance. The treated students were also less likely to drop out of classes
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10....
University of Chicago Press Journals: Cookie absent
www.journals.uchicago.edu
November 24, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Here's hoping for dozens and dozens of experimental estimates of the effects of anti-corruption messages on vote choice.

We now have enough studies of populist messages for a meta-analysis (papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....); maybe soon we'll be able to do the same for anti-corruption?
November 20, 2025 at 8:15 PM
(prohibition) persuasion in parallel

Had fun reconstructing the data from this 90-year old persuasion experiment that shows that "wet" and "dry" college students update their attitudes in the direction of counterattitudinal persuasive information.

paper: doi.org/10.1080/0022...
November 19, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Audit experimenters of Bluesky... did you know there's a creator on TikTok who is calling churches, synagogues, and mosques asking if they have baby formula for her two month old?

This is a "one condition" study (no causal inference) but hoo boy the descriptives...

www.tiktok.com/@nikalie.mon...
Islamic Center of Charlotte in Charlotte NC. Would help feed a starving baby no hesitation 🥰🥰🥰 #fyp #fypシ #fypシ゚viral #testingyourchurch #church #faith #religion #baby #hungrybabytest #viral #viralvid...
TikTok video by Nikalie 🌈
www.tiktok.com
November 13, 2025 at 3:23 PM
a “Space Force”, if you will
we need a department of kerning
November 13, 2025 at 3:17 PM
I'm one of those academics who measure message persuasiveness via survey experiment. I think it's absolutely the right method for doing so.

I think the response to this good point from @anatosaurus.bsky.social is not to abandon survey exps but instead to measure "getting heard" (attention) also.
November 5, 2025 at 6:13 PM
lol at the MPSA shade in the last line of the FAQ
November 5, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Maybe your texts tell you to "BE A VOTER" like mine.

It all started because of a PNAS paper that claimed that the noun form it increased voter turnout (relative to the verb form ) by 11 to 14 percentage points.

It keeps not replicating, obviously.

Most recently doi.org/10.1017/bpp....
November 4, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Doing meta-reanalysis means my coauthors and I are constantly asking for data.

This month we heard back from 21 of 32 author teams on first email, all responses "yes" or "soon." (nice!)

Innovation: asking authors to post data publicly rather than privately with us via email (4 did, more will!)
October 30, 2025 at 4:26 PM
chat's personalized flattery is getting out of hand
October 29, 2025 at 3:46 PM
rarely have we needed the "suggestive" results from a "factors associated with" design to have the possibility that X affects Y "suggested" to us
This is an excellent point that generalizes.
Researchers often defend suboptimal practices by referring to future studies with better designs.

But: Why would anybody run those studies when you can just throw a bunch of variables into a regression and make sweeping "preliminary" claims?
October 28, 2025 at 12:29 PM
encountered this article by David Weimer from 1986 (cited by 7) with three good ideas for improving science that just a few short decades later, we've started to implement.

Collective Delusion In The Social Sciences: Publishing Incentives For Empirical Abuse

doi.org/10.1111/j.15...
October 27, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Reposted by Alex Coppock
@chloethurston.bsky.social & Mary McGrath (both at @polisciatnu.bsky.social) join the Perspectives on Politics editorial team as Associate Editors in American Politics!
October 20, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Congrats to @daniel-a-n-goldstein.com and @drewstommes.bsky.social for showing how an information treatment that US wars are fought predominantly by the poor increases preferences for recruiting from the rich.

No effect on tax policy tho! here again we see fx on "target attitudes" not "nontarget"
Do citizens want to address unfair burden-sharing in public goods? New research out in ISQ @isq-jrnl.bsky.social with @drewstommes.bsky.social addresses this question by highlighting the unequal socioeconomic costs of US wars

academic.oup.com/isq/article/...
October 17, 2025 at 4:24 PM
What are you doing Thursday Nov 13? This panel on survey methods for measuring "rare traits" seems v. important especially if we think small numbers of people sometimes have outsize influence on politics.

The speakers appear to be Bluesky-less, but I'll tag the moderator @mattgraham.bsky.social!
Rare traits like support for violence, conspiracy beliefs, and unsafe health behaviors are really hard to measure! On Thursday November 13, learn from experts about the problem and solutions.

Free for students and AAPOR members, $5 for others. Sign up here: www.eventbrite.com/e/the-rare-t...
October 16, 2025 at 3:41 PM
👀 this new meta-analysis on edutainment by @bardiarahmani.bsky.social, Montano, @dylanwgroves.bsky.social, and Green

doi.org/10.1017/bpp....

377 ests in 77 exps: edutainment moves attitudes, norms, beliefs 📊
Effects persist ⏳
Many reasonable theories about effect heterogeneity are not supported 😇
October 14, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Reposted by Alex Coppock
Currently in FirstView: In “Balancing Precision and Retention in Experimental Design,” @gustavodiaz.org and Erin Rossiter study how experimental design choices can increase precision when estimating treatment effects. Specifically, they examine block-randomized and pre-post designs.
October 14, 2025 at 4:35 PM