Andrew Mercer
@awmercer.bsky.social
6.9K followers 1.3K following 4.1K posts
Principal methodologist at Pew Research Center. He/him
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
awmercer.bsky.social
Honestly, your post could apply to just about anything.
awmercer.bsky.social
Must be sports night on the TL.
awmercer.bsky.social
Although you *can* do this in one step with a word boundary:

str_split("A,B,C, D", ",\\b")
awmercer.bsky.social
Yeah, just realized I misread the request. 😆
awmercer.bsky.social
Oh, lol, and I just realized I totally misread it.
awmercer.bsky.social
str_split(string, "\\s*,\\s*") will treat any combination of space and a comma as the delimiter.
awmercer.bsky.social
Fantastic show at the 9:30 club tonight! You guys killed it! ✌️
awmercer.bsky.social
See, to me it seems pretty harmless. The use cases that baffle me are the ones that could get you sued for malpractice or disbarred if it screws up.
awmercer.bsky.social
Oh, see this totally makes sense to me. Presumably they read all the guidebooks and travel websites, and the stakes are generally pretty low if it gives bad suggestions.
awmercer.bsky.social
Terrific piece from @gelliottmorris.com this morning.

Whenever you ask if something “might” happen or “may” be necessary, it’s very easy for respondents to think of scenarios where the answer is yes, no matter how unlikely.
Why most polls overstate support for political violence
Misperceptions about the popularity of violence increase public support for it — but you can help change that.
www.gelliottmorris.com
awmercer.bsky.social
Depending on how you plan to distribute it, neither would require you to collect anything identifying (like email addresses), although if you are planning to post a public link, there will probably be a lot of spam/bots no matter what.
awmercer.bsky.social
SurveyMonkey and Alchemer are both decent with the former being easier but less flexible and the latter costing a bit more. Qualtrics is very expensive unless you work at a university and get it for free.
Reposted by Andrew Mercer
johngramlich.bsky.social
The US Supreme Court returns today for its new term, two decades after John Roberts became chief justice. As this chart shows, public views of the court are much more negative – and far more politically divided – than 20 years ago. www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
Line chart showing how public opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court has changed in recent decades, both among Americans overall and among Republicans and Democrats. The chart is based on Pew Research Center surveys of U.S. adults.
awmercer.bsky.social
If you must, search for “bigot neuron”, but don’t say you weren’t warned.
Reposted by Andrew Mercer
proptermalone.bsky.social
we should invent a Discourse that isn’t increasingly furious people talking past each other
awmercer.bsky.social
This is 100% correct. At this point I would pay extra to get rid of copilot.
awmercer.bsky.social
If you’re lucky, you have either blocked or been blocked by one or more of the relevant parties.
awmercer.bsky.social
Oh I meant “deep cut” in the sense that he was referencing an obscure bit of internet lore from 2008 but that works too.
awmercer.bsky.social
That’s a pretty deep cut but also yes.
awmercer.bsky.social
So tired of all the helicopters. So many helicopters.
awmercer.bsky.social
Agree about target trials. I guess I see Pearl and Robins as connected they’re coauthors some papers related to DAGS and confounding. But you’re right that Robins uses counterfactuals. It’s messy.
awmercer.bsky.social
Published online. It was originally published in 2000.