Ben Radford
@benradford.bsky.social
670 followers 850 following 98 posts
Computational social science, machine learning, Bayesian stats, political conflict, forecasting, cybersecurity, international relations. www.benradford.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
His catchphrase is "I didn't even break a sweat 😏🍸"
OMG yes I've been saying this! I would pay so much for an email service that charges the sender $0.05 per incoming message
Ok it was the first one
Even odds between complaining about unclear gender signage on latrines versus surrendering NATO command to Russia
Reposted by Ben Radford
Im begging the NYT to spend time talking to people who actually teach and work at universities. Especially ones that don't have billion dollar endowments.

My issues are AI use, crumbling infrastructure, vanishing staff, unfunded state mandates, a customer service model of education...
Please please please let all the university presidents see Disney and learn how easy it is
I think soldiers under Callum were charged but not convicted for Mai Lai
Reposted by Ben Radford
Reposted by Ben Radford
what are the most widely read digital newspapers by web traffic across the US and EU? do you know of any current repositories?
Oh wow yeah I completely forgot to circle back to the UAP attack. 13yo Ben would be so ashamed
NASA maybe finding life on Mars doesn't even make the cut, huh?
Yesssssss ❤️ Snow Tha Product
I swear If I ever find out who's telling my students they need to test models with ViFs...
Reposted by Ben Radford
New job ad: Assistant Professor of Quantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College apply.interfolio.com/172357

Please share with your networks. I am the search chair and happy to answer questions!
Skills & tools that nobody teaches you but that pay for themselves many times over in social sciences:

1. regex
2. Linux
3. Selenium & beautifulsoup
4. Git
5. SQL
Learn to love regex. Don't let ChatGPT steal the joy that could be yours
"[editorial team reading] largely corroborates the reviewers' assessment both positive and critical. We found merit in your paper but share some of the concerns raised by the reviewers" 🙄
Two out of two reviews are basically all "I just don't get LLMs" like this
There needs to be a public forum for rebutting and shaming bad reviews in political science. Just got rejected on measuring ideology of LLMs bc reviewer "sincerely hopes we're never in a world where LLMs make policy so [doesn't] know why [they] should be interested"

I've got bad news, buddy...