Chimmy and Ada are still gay
@chimerror.blacksky.app
Black Trans Gamedev Furry in her 40s from Seattle, WA, USA
she/her
Mostly for project updates for now, probably, daily liveblogging over at @[email protected]
Art by @roxannarachnid.bsky.social
she/her
Mostly for project updates for now, probably, daily liveblogging over at @[email protected]
Art by @roxannarachnid.bsky.social
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
have you thought about shrews yet today
December 8, 2025 at 6:44 AM
have you thought about shrews yet today
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
Oh oh.... the kobold now looks shiny......
December 7, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Oh oh.... the kobold now looks shiny......
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
Also as I told Talib, I do not go in for the worldview that says people have only one "real" name, and also "Malachite Tiger" or some variation on it is the *least* anonymous name for me to go by. The one the largest number of people would know me by.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
December 8, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Also as I told Talib, I do not go in for the worldview that says people have only one "real" name, and also "Malachite Tiger" or some variation on it is the *least* anonymous name for me to go by. The one the largest number of people would know me by.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
Me, as a kid, my mom being terrified if I disclosed even a single piece of information because everyone online was a child trafficker or whatever.
Me, as an adult, seeing people the same age as her now treat me as the freak for NOT disclosing my personal info.
I think we overshot things here.
Me, as an adult, seeing people the same age as her now treat me as the freak for NOT disclosing my personal info.
I think we overshot things here.
It is amazing how some people just cannot understand the concept of a consistent, traceable pseudonymous identity.
That furries, by virtue of being furries, are nothing but "anonymous trolls"
like, fuck's sake, this presentation is more honest than our goddamn "bank names" lmao.
That furries, by virtue of being furries, are nothing but "anonymous trolls"
like, fuck's sake, this presentation is more honest than our goddamn "bank names" lmao.
Also as I told Talib, I do not go in for the worldview that says people have only one "real" name, and also "Malachite Tiger" or some variation on it is the *least* anonymous name for me to go by. The one the largest number of people would know me by.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
December 8, 2025 at 6:47 AM
Me, as a kid, my mom being terrified if I disclosed even a single piece of information because everyone online was a child trafficker or whatever.
Me, as an adult, seeing people the same age as her now treat me as the freak for NOT disclosing my personal info.
I think we overshot things here.
Me, as an adult, seeing people the same age as her now treat me as the freak for NOT disclosing my personal info.
I think we overshot things here.
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
It is amazing how some people just cannot understand the concept of a consistent, traceable pseudonymous identity.
That furries, by virtue of being furries, are nothing but "anonymous trolls"
like, fuck's sake, this presentation is more honest than our goddamn "bank names" lmao.
That furries, by virtue of being furries, are nothing but "anonymous trolls"
like, fuck's sake, this presentation is more honest than our goddamn "bank names" lmao.
Also as I told Talib, I do not go in for the worldview that says people have only one "real" name, and also "Malachite Tiger" or some variation on it is the *least* anonymous name for me to go by. The one the largest number of people would know me by.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
December 8, 2025 at 6:33 AM
It is amazing how some people just cannot understand the concept of a consistent, traceable pseudonymous identity.
That furries, by virtue of being furries, are nothing but "anonymous trolls"
like, fuck's sake, this presentation is more honest than our goddamn "bank names" lmao.
That furries, by virtue of being furries, are nothing but "anonymous trolls"
like, fuck's sake, this presentation is more honest than our goddamn "bank names" lmao.
If you look up "chimerror", almost every result you'll find is me. If you look up my legal name, it's drowning in results that are not me because I had one of the most popular names my birth year, and I have a very common last name.
Even my chosen name has a good mix that isn't me.
Even my chosen name has a good mix that isn't me.
It is amazing how some people just cannot understand the concept of a consistent, traceable pseudonymous identity.
That furries, by virtue of being furries, are nothing but "anonymous trolls"
like, fuck's sake, this presentation is more honest than our goddamn "bank names" lmao.
That furries, by virtue of being furries, are nothing but "anonymous trolls"
like, fuck's sake, this presentation is more honest than our goddamn "bank names" lmao.
Also as I told Talib, I do not go in for the worldview that says people have only one "real" name, and also "Malachite Tiger" or some variation on it is the *least* anonymous name for me to go by. The one the largest number of people would know me by.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
My government name would be *more* anonymous.
December 8, 2025 at 6:40 AM
If you look up "chimerror", almost every result you'll find is me. If you look up my legal name, it's drowning in results that are not me because I had one of the most popular names my birth year, and I have a very common last name.
Even my chosen name has a good mix that isn't me.
Even my chosen name has a good mix that isn't me.
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
much has rightfully been said about the role the storefronts play in strangling the adult content out of games, but i think it's also worth pointing to how restrictive twitch and youtube are, when conventional wisdom is that you need people to stream your game for it to sell well
December 8, 2025 at 5:34 AM
much has rightfully been said about the role the storefronts play in strangling the adult content out of games, but i think it's also worth pointing to how restrictive twitch and youtube are, when conventional wisdom is that you need people to stream your game for it to sell well
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
November 30, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
* Zach de la Rocha voice *
EATING PIES
IS JUSTIFIED!
BY HAVING IT BE AN OCCASIONAL TREAT!
JUSTIFIED!
EATING PIES!
BY HAVING IT BE AN OCCASIONAL TREAT!
UNGH! MOTHERFUCKA!
EATING PIES
IS JUSTIFIED!
BY HAVING IT BE AN OCCASIONAL TREAT!
JUSTIFIED!
EATING PIES!
BY HAVING IT BE AN OCCASIONAL TREAT!
UNGH! MOTHERFUCKA!
December 8, 2025 at 5:40 AM
* Zach de la Rocha voice *
EATING PIES
IS JUSTIFIED!
BY HAVING IT BE AN OCCASIONAL TREAT!
JUSTIFIED!
EATING PIES!
BY HAVING IT BE AN OCCASIONAL TREAT!
UNGH! MOTHERFUCKA!
EATING PIES
IS JUSTIFIED!
BY HAVING IT BE AN OCCASIONAL TREAT!
JUSTIFIED!
EATING PIES!
BY HAVING IT BE AN OCCASIONAL TREAT!
UNGH! MOTHERFUCKA!
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
(trying to explain why "dubstep" is a controversial term in electronic scenes to a gamer) so you know how when you search bullet hells on steam you get a bunch of games that aren't bullet hells
December 8, 2025 at 1:21 AM
(trying to explain why "dubstep" is a controversial term in electronic scenes to a gamer) so you know how when you search bullet hells on steam you get a bunch of games that aren't bullet hells
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
i have to share this amazing birthday present @blujaymacaw.bsky.social painted for me i'm losing my MIND
December 3, 2025 at 7:37 PM
i have to share this amazing birthday present @blujaymacaw.bsky.social painted for me i'm losing my MIND
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
if “science” only refers to what’s currently believed then it has no history; it’s a thin line of apparent lone geniuses rather than a socially and culturally embedded activity that has grown, changed and absorbed and lost elements over time. And everyone doing it now is Darwin, Einstein or Galileo
December 4, 2025 at 1:35 PM
if “science” only refers to what’s currently believed then it has no history; it’s a thin line of apparent lone geniuses rather than a socially and culturally embedded activity that has grown, changed and absorbed and lost elements over time. And everyone doing it now is Darwin, Einstein or Galileo
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
and then, perhaps, “the problem with eugenics back then was that they dehumanized the wrong set of traits” doesn’t sound so compelling
December 4, 2025 at 1:26 PM
and then, perhaps, “the problem with eugenics back then was that they dehumanized the wrong set of traits” doesn’t sound so compelling
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
discussed this in seminar yesterday, albeit with reference to “race science” generally. If you understand science as a historical phenomenon then the question is what was science then, not whether it would count as science now, and the implication is that what science is now is not forever, either
1. Historically, eugenics was not a pseudoscience. It was *science* Almost every scientist, social scientist, academic, etc. believed in the validity of eugenics. You would have to search far & wide to find a scientist that didn't believe in some form of it. They taught it in college!
December 4, 2025 at 1:24 PM
discussed this in seminar yesterday, albeit with reference to “race science” generally. If you understand science as a historical phenomenon then the question is what was science then, not whether it would count as science now, and the implication is that what science is now is not forever, either
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
They did this through things like eugenic marriage laws, better baby contests, and fitter family contests. Some of this is certainly about preventing disease, but most of it is about preserving & supporting white supremacy. Only white protestant babies, for example, could win a better baby contest.
December 4, 2025 at 12:44 PM
They did this through things like eugenic marriage laws, better baby contests, and fitter family contests. Some of this is certainly about preventing disease, but most of it is about preserving & supporting white supremacy. Only white protestant babies, for example, could win a better baby contest.
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
More commonly, American eugenicists believed in what some scholars call "positive eugenics." Not "positive" as in "good," but rather encouraging the "right" people to have more babies and trying to encourage the "right" genetic traits to be passed down.
December 4, 2025 at 12:44 PM
More commonly, American eugenicists believed in what some scholars call "positive eugenics." Not "positive" as in "good," but rather encouraging the "right" people to have more babies and trying to encourage the "right" genetic traits to be passed down.
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
Others were even worse! Some people I study advocated for what they called "eugenic euthanasia," or killing people who could not support themselves because of medical conditions. Many eugenicists disagreed with both of these!
December 4, 2025 at 12:44 PM
Others were even worse! Some people I study advocated for what they called "eugenic euthanasia," or killing people who could not support themselves because of medical conditions. Many eugenicists disagreed with both of these!
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
2. Focusing on the where I said scientists & others believed in "some form of eugenics." That's key to another problem with OPs post. Eugenicists had a WIDE spectrum of eugenic beliefs & often disagreed! Some eugenicists believed in OPs version: forced & coerced sterilization.
December 4, 2025 at 12:44 PM
2. Focusing on the where I said scientists & others believed in "some form of eugenics." That's key to another problem with OPs post. Eugenicists had a WIDE spectrum of eugenic beliefs & often disagreed! Some eugenicists believed in OPs version: forced & coerced sterilization.
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
NOW, it's a pseudoscience because it's been debunked & is no longer mainstream scientific thinking. Calling historical eugenics a pseudoscience lets science & scientists of the past off the hook (Also, PS is more of a modern-day term. We had terms like "quackery" but eugenics was not that)
December 4, 2025 at 12:44 PM
NOW, it's a pseudoscience because it's been debunked & is no longer mainstream scientific thinking. Calling historical eugenics a pseudoscience lets science & scientists of the past off the hook (Also, PS is more of a modern-day term. We had terms like "quackery" but eugenics was not that)
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
1. Historically, eugenics was not a pseudoscience. It was *science* Almost every scientist, social scientist, academic, etc. believed in the validity of eugenics. You would have to search far & wide to find a scientist that didn't believe in some form of it. They taught it in college!
December 4, 2025 at 12:44 PM
1. Historically, eugenics was not a pseudoscience. It was *science* Almost every scientist, social scientist, academic, etc. believed in the validity of eugenics. You would have to search far & wide to find a scientist that didn't believe in some form of it. They taught it in college!
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
This man did a photo opp of himself destroying homeless people's last possessions.
California Governor Gavin Newsom said on Thursday that the Democratic Party needed to be “more culturally normal” and “less judgmental.”
December 7, 2025 at 1:36 AM
This man did a photo opp of himself destroying homeless people's last possessions.
Reposted by Chimmy and Ada are still gay
Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts
December 8, 2025 at 4:10 AM
Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts