Ehud
@duhe.bsky.social
4.2K followers 770 following 4.9K posts
Do you really don’t know? (I’m a philosopher and historian of biology, interested in all things evolutionary, #genetic, or #cognitive. I find most things ridiculous.) http://www.ehudlamm.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
duhe.bsky.social
New paper alert:
Finkel & Lamm, Cultural evolution beyond the individual: what human collective knowledge adds to high fidelity copying.

This is the third in the Distributed Adaptation series.

Many thanks to the diligent reviewers! #philbio #cultevo

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Our analysis points to several conclusions. First, the phenomena highlighted by the notion of DA are contexts of selection, and may favor traits beyond high-fidelity copying. Second, high-fidelity copying is neither necessary nor sufficient for explaining these cultural phenomena. Studying these DA phenomena draws attention to the likely importance of cognitive abilities beyond copying (i.e.– imitation or emulation), that support knowledge aggregation processes. They also highlight the importance of population structure, distribution of a population in the environment, and population density, that are also emphasized by other proposals discussed above. Third, because DAs rely on a variety of population level processes there does not seem to be a general mechanism ensuring a ratchet effect on DAs, unlike the role attributed to high fidelity copying in CCE. Fourth, some games through which children acquire skills are contexts of information acquisition or learning that occurs not only through imitation.
duhe.bsky.social
Excellent book.
rhamdu.bsky.social
Excellent book by @neurograce.bsky.social , accessible but not dumbed down. The math takes a back seat during a tour of important historic and current research in neuroscience. Even if you know parts of the story you may find new insights and connections. GL has a good nose for neurononsense.
Reposted by Ehud
epiphenomenal.bsky.social
Accurate.

#academia #academy #philsky #philosophysky #philosophy #science
Reposted by Ehud
alanrichardson.bsky.social
If you’d like to read a paper about World War One, history and philosophy of science—especially Sarton’s New Humanism and Reichenbach’s logical empiricism—, and scientific humanism, I wrote one!: www.cambridge.org/core/books/s... #philsky
Scientific Humanisms (Chapter 5) - Science and Humanism
Science and Humanism - October 2025
www.cambridge.org
Reposted by Ehud
aron.ambrosiani.se
The LisaDesk code serves as an example. Ca 40 % of the code is developers’ comments (including ASCII art!) offering useful insights for the historian exploring the development process #shot2025
Reposted by Ehud
aron.ambrosiani.se
How can source code be used as a historical source? That’s the theme of the ”Code Histories” series of panels here at #shot2025. Titaÿna Kauffmann at @c2dh.uni.lu presenting on the Apple LISA computer and its programming languages.
Reposted by Ehud
kendrawrites.com
For some context the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly report in addition to being just a good read, to quote wikipedia, "is the main vehicle for publishing public health information and recommendations that have been received by the CDC from state health departments. "
sherylnyt.bsky.social
BREAKING: Friday night massacre underway at CDC. Doznes of "disease detectives," high-level scientists, entire Washington staff and editors of the MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) have all been RIFed and received the following notice:
duhe.bsky.social
My contribution would be ”how ai criticism may favor illiberal institutions and practices“ bsky.app/profile/duhe...
duhe.bsky.social
I’m on board with many of the criticisms of AI in education, the arts, and all the rest of it. What I can’t stand are self-satisfied, privileged views that take it is self evident that pre-AI status quo is awesome. You can object to AI in schools without accepting that schools are marvelous places.
Reposted by Ehud
sherylnyt.bsky.social
BREAKING: Friday night massacre underway at CDC. Doznes of "disease detectives," high-level scientists, entire Washington staff and editors of the MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) have all been RIFed and received the following notice:
Reposted by Ehud
paleofuture.bsky.social
This is AI.
jennbudd.bsky.social
Seems like they are going after reporters who are women. They hit one w/pepper spray ammo in her car, the WGN reporter and now this.
Reposted by Ehud
deevybee.bsky.social
As someone who thinks about standards of evidence for detecting research misconduct, I found this lecture by Frederick Schauer on his 2022 book The Proof very thought-provoking. He approaches it from perspective of a lawyer looking at use of evidence in everyday life. www.youtube.com/watch?v=JB6q...
‘The Proof’ With Frederick Schauer
YouTube video by University of Virginia School of Law
www.youtube.com
duhe.bsky.social
I’m on board with many of the criticisms of AI in education, the arts, and all the rest of it. What I can’t stand are self-satisfied, privileged views that take it is self evident that pre-AI status quo is awesome. You can object to AI in schools without accepting that schools are marvelous places.
Reposted by Ehud
stephenturner.us
Lost Science is a new NYT series of accounts from scientists who have lost their jobs or funding. You can send your story to the Times here www.nytimes.com/2025/10/08/c...
Reposted by Ehud
matanmazor.bsky.social
Consciousness science as a marketplace of rationalizations

my commentary on @smfleming.bsky.social and @matthiasmichel.bsky.social's thought-provoking BBS paper, and more generally about the field.

osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
duhe.bsky.social
I don’t think the way to improve scientific literacy or fight misinformation is by parsing RFK’s statements. There are more effective ways.
I was pointing out just for our own edification that his wording was weird. Maybe I’m wrong about this and people regularly use this phrase in this way.
Reposted by Ehud
jbakcoleman.bsky.social
A lot of scientists sense the bullshit production machine happening in the admin and reach for terms like “p-hacking” or arguing they’re doing science wrong. This is remarkably misguided and just pays them the liars dividend. 🧵
jbakcoleman.bsky.social
I think this is a dangerous framing because all he has to do is preregister a confounded analysis and it crops out as “confirmatory”.
duhe.bsky.social
Prediction: the first AI generated feature film will be a kid’s movie.
Reposted by Ehud
thelabandfield.bsky.social
Well, it's official. After our paper last year (onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....), the Slender-billed Curlew is officially declared Extinct today.

Scientists dream of describing new species, not writing their obituary and epitaph, knowing that they are gone forever #ornithology
Reposted by Ehud
culturalevolsoc.bsky.social
We're pleased to announce and congratulate the winners of the Advancing Cultural Evolution Course Design Awards! This competition recognises leading educators in the field of cultural evolution and their existing efforts to advance its teaching.

We have 7 winners and 2 runners up (listed below):
Reposted by Ehud
jacobtlevy.bsky.social
One of the only things Trump has ever been right about: Obama had no business winning the Nobel Peace Prize for what amounted to the accomplishment of being a US president who was not George W Bush. (Remember, he had been in office for eight months at the time.)
duhe.bsky.social
Lets see if I can do this too… A lot of things need our input…

Philosopher of science here. Sigh. Funding choices inescapably reflect values beyond “scientific merit”. Indeed they should.
cantb.bsky.social
MIT’s response to The Compact invitation
The document also includes principles with which we disagree, including those that would restrict freedom of expression and our independence as an institution. And fundamentally the premise of the document is inconsistent with our core beliefs. That scientific funding should be based on scientific merit alone.
duhe.bsky.social
Isn’t obvious that this is just another shakedown of the Qataris ?