But they aren't worth as much as those that come out of the ground
Because they aren't "real" in some meaningful sense
But they aren't worth as much as those that come out of the ground
Because they aren't "real" in some meaningful sense
If this is too far, what would be okay?
✅️ writing, pics, videos made with Mom's consent - no problem.
As people make digital avatars for *themselves* based on writings, etc. - is it okay to pass those on?
If this is too far, what would be okay?
✅️ writing, pics, videos made with Mom's consent - no problem.
As people make digital avatars for *themselves* based on writings, etc. - is it okay to pass those on?
Do you tell most people you talk to that they are wrong?
Really interesting analysis here by @gerritd.bsky.social & @jeremybmerrill.com
While 35% use it for info and 11% for coding, the most striking finding? The emotional intimacy.
ChatGPT: "You're not crazy sweetheart — you're just early."
Use this link to read it with a $4 day pass to @washingtonpost.com: bit.ly/47QOjUb
Do you tell most people you talk to that they are wrong?
A banger right now is Tupac and crew rapping to a doorbell camera while holding a bowl of beans. Users keep changing what he's rapping about, and they're all fire 🔥
Here he is going through the provinces of Canada
A banger right now is Tupac and crew rapping to a doorbell camera while holding a bowl of beans. Users keep changing what he's rapping about, and they're all fire 🔥
Here he is going through the provinces of Canada
I'm not, but I'm pointing you towards one.
An academic experiment/game where an AI judges your writing.
It does not like you.
Feed it your data: nonslop.app
I'm not, but I'm pointing you towards one.
An academic experiment/game where an AI judges your writing.
It does not like you.
Feed it your data: nonslop.app
Check our article instead, which uses conversations not individually chosen for public sharing, actually describes our methods and data, and finds quite different distributions for how people use ChatGPT and personal info disclosed in their chats.
Check our article instead, which uses conversations not individually chosen for public sharing, actually describes our methods and data, and finds quite different distributions for how people use ChatGPT and personal info disclosed in their chats.
What if that same move could solve the youth employment crisis...?"
What if that same move could solve the youth employment crisis...?"
I always heard the ‘reassuring’ message that “there are no stupid questions”
But the truth is that there are questions you don’t want to ask in a classroom full of your peers. Or even trusted mentor/friend. LLMs are great for that.
People have so many things they'd like to say, discuss, learn
But they fear judgement by others, or need greater patience than a human being will provide
All along, we were the ones holding back the full actualization of our fellow man.
I always heard the ‘reassuring’ message that “there are no stupid questions”
But the truth is that there are questions you don’t want to ask in a classroom full of your peers. Or even trusted mentor/friend. LLMs are great for that.
People have so many things they'd like to say, discuss, learn
But they fear judgement by others, or need greater patience than a human being will provide
All along, we were the ones holding back the full actualization of our fellow man.
People have so many things they'd like to say, discuss, learn
But they fear judgement by others, or need greater patience than a human being will provide
All along, we were the ones holding back the full actualization of our fellow man.
> people keep yelling at us about bad names
> sama: "did you guys hear about Baguetteotron (laudatory)?"
It’s named Baguettotron, people.
BAGUETTOTRON.
> people keep yelling at us about bad names
> sama: "did you guys hear about Baguetteotron (laudatory)?"