Ellie (they/she)
elliejvela.bsky.social
Ellie (they/she)
@elliejvela.bsky.social
51 followers 140 following 21 posts
Queer Scholar of Technology and Power || 🌲25 || MSCS in HCI Stanford -> Seattle! Currently looking for employment 👍
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Excited to be applying for PhD programs soon! I’m interested in queer + trans technology, social computing, and game design. Ultimately, I hope to bring a critique of power to my studies of technology. Would really appreciate any advice/connections, especially if you’re an academic in HCI or InfoSci
The women’s bathroom is closed but luckily I’m genderfluid and can simply perform advanced gender justsu to flow my gender in the direction called for by any given situation
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
"In this context of closing the women’s office, the LGBTQ office, and in the context of Brown capitulating on understandings of gender, it’s hard not to imagine that a tenure decision about a star scholar in the WGS program would not have also been influenced by this political moment."
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
Only 1 person in the whole study went from identifying as trans to not identifying as trans. The 1/5 number came from youth going between the binary and non-binary spectrum.

This headline and post are misleading on purpose to fit the economist's editorial bent on the political issue.
A recent study found that children who transitioned young retained stable gender identities over time. But the fact that nearly a fifth of those in the group did not ought to give advocates of irreversible medical interventions pause
How stable are the gender identities of younger children?
A study finds that one in five who switch gender change their mind
econ.st
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
🧵
What we're seeing in the "don't sign up for protests" discourse is what Paulo Freire described as the convert's failure to trust the knowledge of the oppressed. As the convert tries to stand in solidarity with the oppressed, they refuse to let go of a world where they were the authority by default.
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
“If we automate the whole world and only a few people have the means with which to more than just survive, but to live well, have meaningful lives, there's a big problem, a huge problem coming down the line," he said.
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
the powerful are aligned supporting genocide and silencing critical voices. use your power and hit them where it hurts, boycott these products. and pass it on
#Boycott these genocide supporting companies 👇
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
Dam been writing a book about this and she just TikToked it in 90 seconds.
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
1. Just so we’re clear, this is the clip that got Jimmy Kimmel’s show shelved by ABC.

If I’m missing any other clips please let me know.
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
this is probably a good time for you to consider whether that disney+ subscription is worth it just to watch andor for the fourteenth time, tbh
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
So much of the absurdity in how some elites talk about Charlie Kirk—or navigate the authoritarian politics of this regime—stems from political science’s and the elite class’s fixation on polarization, and the misguided belief that it’s inherently bad and that the “remedy” is civil submission.
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
ah, well
a good arbiter of how close we are to bad hybrid regime shit is if the political comedy shows start getting pulled for whatever reason
The FCC chair threatened legal action against ABC and now they’ve pulled Jimmy Kimmel off the air. Supposedly Kimmel was inciting violence, but clearly his comments were criticisms of Trump and the MAGA movement’s response to Kirk’s assassination.
To me the discourse around Charlie Kirk has the familiar reek of GamerGate - ie a decentralized harassment campaign aiming to silence criticism of powers that be. This time, though, what really scares me is the federal government joining by inflaming and acting on behalf of the harassers.
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
On June 24, I began my Election Night speech by quoting Mandela: “It always seems impossible until it’s done.” That's the spirit of this campaign, and our city.

This is "Until It’s Done,” a new series about New Yorkers who refused to accept that a worthy goal was impossible.
Blame the guy who actually insulted you! For me, this was the most critical takeaway from the argument that we need to reframe robots not as moral actors but as Mediators - tools that allow humans to interact in new ways.
We’re also failing to blame the parties that actually hold responsibility for perpetuating these harms.

Blaming a robot for taking your job is like blaming the air for carrying an insult to your ears. Yes, it doesn’t make sense to assign blame to air for moral wrongdoing. AND you failed to
The employer who opted for cheap automated labor over human labor and the policy makers who allow humans to be denied basic dignities like food, shelter, and opportunities for fulfilling labor. Yes, we’re mistakenly blaming harms on robots when robots are not a kind of thing fit to receive blame,
The issue with debating “robot rights” goes beyond the simple category error we make by anthropomorphizing nonhuman systems. To blame a robot for, say, taking your job directs responsibility away from the parties truthfully at fault, namely -
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
New Mexico has issued a public health order that removes federal restrictions to COVID-19 vaccine access so that pharmacies in New Mexico can vaccinate people of all ages and risk profiles. Every state need to do this!
Reposted by Ellie (they/she)
We wrote a book about AI, Class, and Capitalism!
*Why We Fear AI* argues that, fundamentally, AI is a tool of class war from above, a tool for surveillance, labor control, and wage depression. Get it from your local bookstore if you can!
A quick 🧵1/4
Why We Fear AI: On the Interpretation of Nightmares
On the Interpretation of Nightmares
bookshop.org