esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
esmezelda.bsky.social
esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
@esmezelda.bsky.social
120 followers 260 following 520 posts
Politics and gaming, mostly Zelda.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Show me your real art made by human hands and I will like and share them

This is a human-safe account
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
Ganondorf IS EVIL
Ganondorf has condemned the No Kings protests taking place across Hyrule today, has baselessly accused them of being funded by “The ‘Sloppy’ Seven Sages”, and threatened to send his Demon Army after any “insurrectionists and agitators” who threaten his authority.
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
This looks really familiar - what’s it called?
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
We're not at war with Venezuela, these boats are many hundreds of lines from our waters, much less our shores, there is no threat, this is just murder.

I really do think everyone from the SecDef to the guy who pushed the button should be tried for murder on this.
Don’t believe anyone who tells you that intelligence shows anything “without a doubt,” but even if the intelligence was water-tight, this strike was still murder. No law permits the deliberate, premeditated killing of civilians.
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
But somehow Trump not just breaking a promise but intentionally misrepresenting his entire extremist, revolutionary agenda to absolutely devastate and reconfigure US government is treated as, more or less, Trump Just Being Trump.
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
But for some reason, our media doesn't want to talk about it like that. Our political class, which considers things like "if you like your insurance you can keep it" to be five-alarm whoppers, acts like Trump has a mandate for Project 2025 and it must be respected.

Again: it polled at FOUR PERCENT.
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
"Some legal experts have called it a crime to summarily kill civilians."

"Some legal experts have called it a crime to summarily kill civilians."

"Some legal experts have called it a crime to summarily kill civilians."

"Some legal experts have called it a crime to summarily kill civilians."
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
I think the Trump admin assumed no one would try to find out who the people on the boats they blew up really were
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
I genuinely don't know how you extract meaningful concessions if the executive branch can choose to spend money or not regardless of what's in the CR, apparently with SCOTUS's shadowy blessing.

That and all the rest of the rampant lying and lawlessness, of course.
At this point, any Democrat who votes to keep this government open without extracting very serious concessions — RFK’s resignation, ICE rollback, Epstein Files release, etc — will absolutely face a primary challenger who will set fundraising records.
Republicans run the White House, Congress and Supreme Court on the principle that the only role Dems can play is bailing the GOP out from facing the consequences of their own actions.

They expect Dems to clean up after them and save them from voters’ blame, and sadly some Dems want to do just that.
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
At this point, any Democrat who votes to keep this government open without extracting very serious concessions — RFK’s resignation, ICE rollback, Epstein Files release, etc — will absolutely face a primary challenger who will set fundraising records.
Republicans run the White House, Congress and Supreme Court on the principle that the only role Dems can play is bailing the GOP out from facing the consequences of their own actions.

They expect Dems to clean up after them and save them from voters’ blame, and sadly some Dems want to do just that.
Actual White House quote: “go fuck yourself.”

Its not being some pearl clutching prude to ask whether this is really how most Americans want their kids to see the seat of our government behave. www.politico.com/news/2025/09...
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
I have 3 axioms that help me decide when to talk to people I disagree with:

1. To debate a subject is to concede that the subject is debatable.

2. To reason with a person is to concede that the person is reasonable.

3. To ask for evidence of a claim is to concede that the claim might be true.
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
Talk Of Fascism Dangerous, Warns Ministry Of Compliance
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
The Democrat message should be simple:

“The GOP controls the House, the Senate, the White House, and the Supreme Court. They control the whole government, and they are the ones shutting it down.”
Why though? Republicans are in control of both chambers!
Reposted by esmezelda 🇺🇸🇬🇧🌱
Why are the American president's claims about autism the first item on British news bulletins?

He's not our president, the advice doesn't apply here and he's not presented any evidence to support his assertions.

So why spread these claims? What make this the biggest story in the UK?