Gilad Feldman
banner
giladfeldman.bsky.social
Gilad Feldman
@giladfeldman.bsky.social
Social psychology, judgment & decision-making/behavioral economics, agency, & action. Open/meta science. (Peer Community in) Registered Reports, mass replications, & meta-analyses.

https://mgto.org/resume-cv/
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Social psych friends, please help me out with a class discussion by responding to the following (and sharing):

What do you see as the biggest challenge for social and personality psychology in the immediate future? What should we as a field be doing better than we are now?
November 23, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
We’ve wrestled a lot in the past decade with poor publishing incentives - but I see a similar unreckoned-with threat from funding incentives. When universities prioritize grants/funding in tenure & hiring decisions, the folks holding the purse strings control WHAT we study. That cannot be good.
November 23, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
The replication crisis has shown that social psych is largely built upon sand rather than solid ground. While practices have improved dramatically we’re still trying to figure out which “older” theories hold and which do not. And I personally struggle to track what has replicated vs. not.
November 23, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
The increasing difficulty of getting high quality data given contaminated samples, something that is about to get much worse than it already is (see www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...)
The potential existential threat of large language models to online survey research | PNAS
The advancement of large language models poses a severe, potentially existential threat to online survey research, a fundamental tool for data coll...
www.pnas.org
November 23, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Talk I gave at University of Bucharest now online:
"The Psychology of Single Questions: The revolutionary simple approach to better understand human psyche and decision-making"

Watch the talk on YouTube:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIQH...

Idea: Even a single question can result in important insights.
Psychology of Single Questions: Simple method to better understand human psyche & decision-making
YouTube video by Gilad Feldman
www.youtube.com
November 22, 2025 at 11:00 AM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Job posting alert! Open Science Specialist at the University of Calgary (in Canada!) #job #OpenScience careers.ucalgary.ca/jobs/1704502...
Specialist, Open Science, Research Services in Calgary, AB, ...
Specialist, Open Science, Research Services in Calgary, AB, ...
careers.ucalgary.ca
November 19, 2025 at 10:47 PM
Upcoming Zoom talk:
"Towards Collaborative and Open Research: Data Management and Project Workflows with the Open Science Framework"

(Chinese University of Hong Kong library)
Tues, Nov 25 2025, 2-330pm HK time (GMT+8)

All are welcome.

Registration:
cloud.itsc.cuhk.edu.hk/webform/view...
November 19, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
I'm excited to share access to a video of the conversation @angeladuckworth.bsky.social & I hosted at Wharton w/ our brilliant friends @rthaler.bsky.social & @aleximas.bsky.social about their new book THE WINNER'S CURSE & how behavioral econ has evolved in the last 30 years. youtu.be/hH8UgQb-x4A?...
The Anomalies That Changed Economics | Richard Thaler and Alex Imas
YouTube video by Behavior Change For Good Initiative
youtu.be
November 18, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Glad to see that in the criteria for tenure our department now explicitly includes #openscience. There’s hope!

@ikmz.bsky.social @esserfrank.bsky.social
November 17, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
In our rejoinder, we argue 1) Dark terminology isn't used responsibly as BL et al. claim, 2) the term can be replaced with a more sensible and scientific one, 3) data support our position (Stanton et al., 2025), and 4) popularity ≠ importance. @davidchester.bsky.social @drlynam.bsky.social
The 'Dark Triad' may be popular, but more importantly, it is irresponsible, moralizing, trivializing, and ultimately, replaceable: A rejoinder to Borraz-Leon, Rantala, and Jonason (2025): https://osf.io/u86th
November 17, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Our new preprint! The Acknowledgments problem, and what to do about it.
With @martonkovacs.bsky.social, @pietropollo.bsky.social, @philobolobstime.bsky.social, Losia Lagisz, & Mohammad Hosseini.
November 17, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Rather than a "Limitations" section now common in some areas of science, our preprint includes a lengthy "Objections and responses" section, phillosophy paper style. I'm sure that section will comprehensively answer all your criticisms and concerns. osf.io/preprints/me...
But seriously, we'd love
OSF
osf.io
November 17, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
New version of tenzing, with support for acknowledgments sections, is now live at tenzing.club. Please try to break it, @martonkovacs.bsky.social has already fixed all the errors I found!
tenzing Documenting contributorship with CRediT
tenzing.club
November 14, 2025 at 9:58 AM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Last chance to register!!!
Participate in R4E's online seminar on November 19th at 10 a.m. Eastern Time/4 p.m. Central European Time. This event welcomes all inquisitive individuals. For more information, check out: repro4everyone.org/blog/r4e-spo...
#HigherEd #EDUsky #academicchatter #academicsky
November 14, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Two authors reanalyze the data from an earlier paper, cannot replicate the findings, and conclude that the original is wrong. The twist: the first author is the same on both papers. I only wonder why the original is not retracted.
link.springer.com/article/10.3...
link.springer.com/article/10.3...
Category effects on stimulus estimation: Shifting and skewed frequency distributions—A reexamination - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Duffy, Huttenlocher, Hedges, and Crawford (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 224–230, 2010) report on experiments where participants estimate the lengths of lines. These studies were designed to t...
link.springer.com
November 14, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
I think this is an overly pessimistic take from the @bmj.com.

Sharing data does not inherently increase trust, rather it enables verification which allows for trust calibration.

This example is a win. Serious issues were rapidly detected that would not have been without mandatory data sharing.
November 14, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Our paper on improving statistical reporting in psychology is now online 🎉

As a part of this paper, we also created the Transparent Statistical Reporting in Psychology checklist, which researchers can use to improve their statistical reporting practices

www.nature.com/articles/s44...
November 14, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Great initiative Stefanie! Because we also need researchers to step up & out of the shadows! In the Netherlands universities, libraries and NWO have coordinated actions and efforts to support DOA. This might be interesting: www.openaccess.nl/nl/diamond-o... and www.openscience.nl/en/cases/tow...
Towards a fairer and more equitable scientific publishing landscape | Open Science NL
The international open access week 2024 kicked off this week. Therewill be a lot of attention for the diamond open access model. NWO haslaunched a call for proposals to support journals that want to make a'flip' towards Diamond Open Access. But there's a lot more going on.In this article, Jeroen Sondervan, programme leader Open ScholarlyCommunication at Open Science NL/Dutch Research Council (NWO), givesan overview of the current developments and challenges.
www.openscience.nl
November 13, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk 🎤

If you’ve read this far and still need convincing, please check out our preprint arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 and this infographic: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
10/10
November 13, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
So what now? 💥
We argue that scholarly publishing needs to be re-communalized.

No, not communism, just academia taking back control of:

1) its journals (hello breakaway journals)
2) its assessment systems (hello @barcelonadori.bsky.social)

6/n
November 13, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
How? 🛠️
Good news: we already have everything needed to fix the system.

Alternative models without paywalls? ✔️
Preprints, diamond journals.

Open infrastructure at production cost not prestige markup? ✔️
@pkp.sfu.ca @scielo.org @redalyc.bsky.social @erudit.org
Community-run, community-governed. 4/n
November 13, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Over the past months (and at least 11 versions!), I was lucky to work with 11 amazing colleagues on a call to action to reform academic publishing.

Not another declaration, but an appeal to our powerful friends, research funders & institutions, to Stop the Drain of Scientific Publishing. 1/n
November 13, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
" 60 per cent of UK university libraries are considering dropping their big deals with the five major academic publisher"
Many call for diamond open access. A new organisation with many partners, @ojcollective.bsky.social , is launching in January.
www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-v...
Chaos is coming for scholarly publishing - Research Professional News
Buckling of commercial models alongside maturing of community-led efforts promises major shifts, says Caroline Edwards
www.researchprofessionalnews.com
November 13, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
The new journal EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY will soon be accepting submissions!
The journal's homepage is now live: journals.ub.uni-koeln.de/index.php/xphi

We will soon also be found under xphi.eu.

Accepting submissions in about 2 weeks.
Experimental Philosophy
journals.ub.uni-koeln.de
November 13, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
I didn't want to get into this discussion, but after seeing strong reactions to Kelly (2025), I think it's worth helping colleagues think more critically about what the paper actually shows—and doesn't show.
Spoiler: not the bombshell some claim.
#SocialPsychology #CognitiveDissonance
Debunking “When Prophecy Fails”
In 1954, Dorothy Martin predicted an apocalyptic flood and promised her followers rescue by flying saucers. When neither arrived, she recanted, her group dissolved, and efforts to proselytize ceased.....
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
November 8, 2025 at 12:54 PM