Krzysztof Cipora
@krzysztofcipora.bsky.social
PhD in psychology, numerical cognition and research methods. Lecturer at Loughborough University, UK
Great to be back to Cracow after almost 10 years of academic „nomad life” :)
We are pleased to announce @krzysztofcipora.bsky.social has joined MCLL as our new co-leader!
After 4 years at the University of Tübingen and 5 years at @lborodme.bsky.social, he returns to Jagiellonian University to lead the lab with @mateuszhohol.bsky.social. Welcome to the team!
After 4 years at the University of Tübingen and 5 years at @lborodme.bsky.social, he returns to Jagiellonian University to lead the lab with @mateuszhohol.bsky.social. Welcome to the team!
October 17, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Great to be back to Cracow after almost 10 years of academic „nomad life” :)
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Beware! 😄🤭🤩 #MCLS2026 @krzysztofcipora.bsky.social @mclstrainee.bsky.social @mcls-official.bsky.social
June 11, 2025 at 9:57 AM
Does SNARC only depend on relative number magnitude? Not necessarily! Our new Registered Report led by wonderful @lillyroth.bsky.social in collaboration with @tuebang.bsky.social, U.-D. Reips, J. Caffier, and A. Overlander
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
One and only SNARC? Spatial-Numerical Associations are not fully flexible and depend on both relative and absolute number magnitude | Royal Society Open Science
Numbers are associated with space, but it is unclear how flexible these associations
are. We investigated whether the SNARC effect (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response
Codes; Dehaene et al. 1993...
royalsocietypublishing.org
January 8, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Does SNARC only depend on relative number magnitude? Not necessarily! Our new Registered Report led by wonderful @lillyroth.bsky.social in collaboration with @tuebang.bsky.social, U.-D. Reips, J. Caffier, and A. Overlander
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
37% of plots in Psychological Bulletin were raincloud plots in 2023! 😮
The Raincloud Quartet (new pre-print)
All N = 111, M = 0.04, SD = 0.27.
One-sided t-tests vs. 0 yield: t(110) = 1.67, p = .049.
Only raincloud plots reveal the qualitative differences, preventing the drawing of inappropriate conclusions.
How did we create the quartet?
Where are data & code?
🧵👇
All N = 111, M = 0.04, SD = 0.27.
One-sided t-tests vs. 0 yield: t(110) = 1.67, p = .049.
Only raincloud plots reveal the qualitative differences, preventing the drawing of inappropriate conclusions.
How did we create the quartet?
Where are data & code?
🧵👇
November 23, 2024 at 2:30 PM
37% of plots in Psychological Bulletin were raincloud plots in 2023! 😮
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
The Raincloud Quartet (new pre-print)
All N = 111, M = 0.04, SD = 0.27.
One-sided t-tests vs. 0 yield: t(110) = 1.67, p = .049.
Only raincloud plots reveal the qualitative differences, preventing the drawing of inappropriate conclusions.
How did we create the quartet?
Where are data & code?
🧵👇
All N = 111, M = 0.04, SD = 0.27.
One-sided t-tests vs. 0 yield: t(110) = 1.67, p = .049.
Only raincloud plots reveal the qualitative differences, preventing the drawing of inappropriate conclusions.
How did we create the quartet?
Where are data & code?
🧵👇
November 23, 2024 at 1:17 PM
The Raincloud Quartet (new pre-print)
All N = 111, M = 0.04, SD = 0.27.
One-sided t-tests vs. 0 yield: t(110) = 1.67, p = .049.
Only raincloud plots reveal the qualitative differences, preventing the drawing of inappropriate conclusions.
How did we create the quartet?
Where are data & code?
🧵👇
All N = 111, M = 0.04, SD = 0.27.
One-sided t-tests vs. 0 yield: t(110) = 1.67, p = .049.
Only raincloud plots reveal the qualitative differences, preventing the drawing of inappropriate conclusions.
How did we create the quartet?
Where are data & code?
🧵👇
Some northern lights to brighten the bluesky
October 11, 2024 at 12:32 AM
Some northern lights to brighten the bluesky
*A fancy journal* takes the
@pci-regreports.bsky.social
paper, charges £1400 (via institutional deal) for publishing it (AKA making a pdf of it). They keep sending back submission e.g., should be submitted as Stage 1 even though it is stage 2 ("this is their process")
@pci-regreports.bsky.social
paper, charges £1400 (via institutional deal) for publishing it (AKA making a pdf of it). They keep sending back submission e.g., should be submitted as Stage 1 even though it is stage 2 ("this is their process")
September 29, 2024 at 4:33 PM
*A fancy journal* takes the
@pci-regreports.bsky.social
paper, charges £1400 (via institutional deal) for publishing it (AKA making a pdf of it). They keep sending back submission e.g., should be submitted as Stage 1 even though it is stage 2 ("this is their process")
@pci-regreports.bsky.social
paper, charges £1400 (via institutional deal) for publishing it (AKA making a pdf of it). They keep sending back submission e.g., should be submitted as Stage 1 even though it is stage 2 ("this is their process")
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Gave a talk on the flexibility of Spatial-Numerical Associations at the #MCLS2024 today 😊💪🏼 As you can read in our preprint, both relative and absolute number magnitude determine the SNARC effect: osf.io/79zsy/files/... 🤯🤔 Thanks to my collaborators, especially to @krzysztofcipora.bsky.social 🥰🙌🏼
OSF
osf.io
November 19, 2024 at 9:45 PM
Gave a talk on the flexibility of Spatial-Numerical Associations at the #MCLS2024 today 😊💪🏼 As you can read in our preprint, both relative and absolute number magnitude determine the SNARC effect: osf.io/79zsy/files/... 🤯🤔 Thanks to my collaborators, especially to @krzysztofcipora.bsky.social 🥰🙌🏼
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Paper by Schmukle 19 (!) years ago came to the same conclusion:
“Estimates of both internal consistency and retest reliability lead to the conclusion that the dot probe task is a completely unreliable measure of attentional allocation”
(Via @ruben.the100.ci)
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
“Estimates of both internal consistency and retest reliability lead to the conclusion that the dot probe task is a completely unreliable measure of attentional allocation”
(Via @ruben.the100.ci)
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
Sage Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
June 16, 2024 at 8:22 PM
Paper by Schmukle 19 (!) years ago came to the same conclusion:
“Estimates of both internal consistency and retest reliability lead to the conclusion that the dot probe task is a completely unreliable measure of attentional allocation”
(Via @ruben.the100.ci)
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
“Estimates of both internal consistency and retest reliability lead to the conclusion that the dot probe task is a completely unreliable measure of attentional allocation”
(Via @ruben.the100.ci)
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Paper alert: across 10k participants & 36 versions of the emotional dot probe task, task *reliability* cannot be distinguished from 0 (!).
Raises very serious questions about the literature (how did so many find positive relations between this task and other variables).
#PsychSciSky
Raises very serious questions about the literature (how did so many find positive relations between this task and other variables).
#PsychSciSky
No Evidence of Reliability Across 36 Variations of the Emotional Dot-Probe Task in 9,600 Participants - Irene Xu, Eliza Passell, Roger W. Strong, Elizabeth Grinspoon, Laneé Jung, Jeremy B. Wilmer, Lau...
The emotional dot-probe task is a widely used measure of attentional bias to threat. Recent work suggests, however, that subtraction-based behavioral measures o...
journals.sagepub.com
June 16, 2024 at 4:28 PM
Paper alert: across 10k participants & 36 versions of the emotional dot probe task, task *reliability* cannot be distinguished from 0 (!).
Raises very serious questions about the literature (how did so many find positive relations between this task and other variables).
#PsychSciSky
Raises very serious questions about the literature (how did so many find positive relations between this task and other variables).
#PsychSciSky
Slowly emptying a file drawer. This Math anxiety dataset might be useful to some folks @mclstrainee.bsky.social
The AMATUS dataset: Arithmetic, Math Anxiety, Math Attitudes and related constructs in Teachers and University Students with different mathematical background: http://osf.io/xse6v/
June 7, 2024 at 4:16 PM
Slowly emptying a file drawer. This Math anxiety dataset might be useful to some folks @mclstrainee.bsky.social
A new preprint led by @lillyroth.bsky.social Trying to tear apart long term memory and working memory ordinality for the letter SNARC @mclstrainee.bsky.social
Smells like SNARC spirit: Coexistence of short- and long-term associations between letters and space: http://osf.io/y7hzv/
June 6, 2024 at 7:12 PM
A new preprint led by @lillyroth.bsky.social Trying to tear apart long term memory and working memory ordinality for the letter SNARC @mclstrainee.bsky.social
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Smells like SNARC spirit: Coexistence of short- and long-term associations between letters and space: http://osf.io/y7hzv/
June 6, 2024 at 2:52 PM
Smells like SNARC spirit: Coexistence of short- and long-term associations between letters and space: http://osf.io/y7hzv/
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Procedure for writing multi-author consensus manuscripts: proposal and reflections on implementation: http://osf.io/sdauf/
May 27, 2024 at 8:33 PM
Procedure for writing multi-author consensus manuscripts: proposal and reflections on implementation: http://osf.io/sdauf/
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Can't help processing numbers with text: Eye-tracking evidence for simultaneous instead of sequential processing of text and numbers in arithmetic word problems: http://osf.io/3uvt8/
April 26, 2024 at 8:43 AM
Can't help processing numbers with text: Eye-tracking evidence for simultaneous instead of sequential processing of text and numbers in arithmetic word problems: http://osf.io/3uvt8/
Ironman SNARC published. Hope to bring some fresh look not only at SNARC literature. @mclstrainee.bsky.social
Happy to share our paper "Don't SNARC me now! Intraindividual variability of cognitive phenomena – Insights from the Ironman paradigm" published in Cognition! 😍 Check it out at: doi.org/10.1016/j.co... 👍
April 25, 2024 at 9:53 AM
Ironman SNARC published. Hope to bring some fresh look not only at SNARC literature. @mclstrainee.bsky.social
Our new paper on analog representation of angle magnitude is out: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Together with M. Hohol and P. Szymanek
Together with M. Hohol and P. Szymanek
April 19, 2024 at 10:26 AM
Our new paper on analog representation of angle magnitude is out: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Together with M. Hohol and P. Szymanek
Together with M. Hohol and P. Szymanek
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
True colors SNARCing: Automaticity of the SNARC effect - evidence from color judgment tasks: http://osf.io/aeyn8/
April 9, 2024 at 9:33 AM
True colors SNARCing: Automaticity of the SNARC effect - evidence from color judgment tasks: http://osf.io/aeyn8/
New preprint by wonderful
@lillyroth.bsky.social
. If you ever wondered whether there is a SNARC effect in the colour judgment task, you can learn it from this study (n > 700): osf.io/preprints/ps...
@lillyroth.bsky.social
. If you ever wondered whether there is a SNARC effect in the colour judgment task, you can learn it from this study (n > 700): osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
April 9, 2024 at 10:45 AM
New preprint by wonderful
@lillyroth.bsky.social
. If you ever wondered whether there is a SNARC effect in the colour judgment task, you can learn it from this study (n > 700): osf.io/preprints/ps...
@lillyroth.bsky.social
. If you ever wondered whether there is a SNARC effect in the colour judgment task, you can learn it from this study (n > 700): osf.io/preprints/ps...
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Interested in becoming a PCI Psychology recommender? I'm happy to share the 1st update about PCIP, which includes a form to express your interest in being a reviewer, a recommender, or a member of the future managing board! Read more about it here: groups.google.com/g/pci-psycho... #PsychSciSky
March 25, 2024 at 4:14 PM
Interested in becoming a PCI Psychology recommender? I'm happy to share the 1st update about PCIP, which includes a form to express your interest in being a reviewer, a recommender, or a member of the future managing board! Read more about it here: groups.google.com/g/pci-psycho... #PsychSciSky
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Do you plan to measure Approximate Number System in children? Check recommendations at doi.org/10.1016/j.dr... by @krajcsi.bsky.social D Chesney @krzysztofcipora.bsky.social @coolenilse.bsky.social @camillakgilmore.bsky.social @mjinglis.bsky.social M Libertus @tuebang.bsky.social V Simms, B Reynvoet
March 18, 2024 at 10:13 AM
Do you plan to measure Approximate Number System in children? Check recommendations at doi.org/10.1016/j.dr... by @krajcsi.bsky.social D Chesney @krzysztofcipora.bsky.social @coolenilse.bsky.social @camillakgilmore.bsky.social @mjinglis.bsky.social M Libertus @tuebang.bsky.social V Simms, B Reynvoet
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
FREE BOOK: Psychometrics in exercises using R and RStudio by Anna Brown
Great resource for university lecturers, instructors, students, and anyone who want to acquire practical skills in conducting psychometric analyses.
annabrown.name/book_psychom...
Great resource for university lecturers, instructors, students, and anyone who want to acquire practical skills in conducting psychometric analyses.
annabrown.name/book_psychom...
February 17, 2024 at 10:13 AM
FREE BOOK: Psychometrics in exercises using R and RStudio by Anna Brown
Great resource for university lecturers, instructors, students, and anyone who want to acquire practical skills in conducting psychometric analyses.
annabrown.name/book_psychom...
Great resource for university lecturers, instructors, students, and anyone who want to acquire practical skills in conducting psychometric analyses.
annabrown.name/book_psychom...
Hi all! @JCBahnmueller and I are searching for someone from numerical cognition, who has been involved in adversarial collaboration project? Anyone? @MCLStrainee
January 8, 2024 at 11:09 AM
Hi all! @JCBahnmueller and I are searching for someone from numerical cognition, who has been involved in adversarial collaboration project? Anyone? @MCLStrainee
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
Finally our work on reporting reaction time pre-processing which started at @improvingpsych.bsky.social conference 2021 is out in print and open access!
How can the transparency of RT data pre-processing be addressed? With our checklist for reporting RT pre-processing decisions, published in
@CORTEXjournal!
This easy-to-grasp checklist will help to increase transparency & standardize data processing prior to statistical analyses.
@CORTEXjournal!
This easy-to-grasp checklist will help to increase transparency & standardize data processing prior to statistical analyses.
December 28, 2023 at 12:34 PM
Finally our work on reporting reaction time pre-processing which started at @improvingpsych.bsky.social conference 2021 is out in print and open access!
Reposted by Krzysztof Cipora
New preprint: When and How to Deviate from a Preregistration osf.io/preprints/ps... I hope this helps researchers to reflect on the consequence of deviations from preregistrations by evaluating the test's severity and the validity of the inference.
December 18, 2023 at 8:48 AM
New preprint: When and How to Deviate from a Preregistration osf.io/preprints/ps... I hope this helps researchers to reflect on the consequence of deviations from preregistrations by evaluating the test's severity and the validity of the inference.