Magdi Jacobs
@magdi.bsky.social
16K followers 950 following 2.5K posts
I write about politics, culture, & science.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
magdi.bsky.social
In historical terms: when did this shift occur? Is it for the first time now? Or did it start before? Either way: Repubs now feel like they have to at least lie about protecting parts of the ACA. That didn't use to be the case. It was their bête noir. A major propoganda point.
magdi.bsky.social
Republican Senate Majority leader reassuring the public re: the "basics of ACA" (& his reassurances are lies) is interesting. Particularly in the midst of a government shutdown w/ some role reversals occurring. Signals need for defense of ACA; possible weakness.
magdi.bsky.social
Maybe it's happened & I just haven't noticed it. If you have, we should pinpoint the time when they shifted from full-frontal ACA attack to "Don't worry about the baseline of ACA." That's a shift. It's either new or it happened & we didn't notice. Either way. . . .
magdi.bsky.social
John Thune is nervous. He just spread a bunch of lies on @pbsnewshour but I noticed one thing in particular: He reassured the audience that the underlying structure of ACA would be intact. He's lying. But I don't think I've heard a Republican make a promise about ACA like that before. Have you?
Reposted by Magdi Jacobs
figgityfigs.bsky.social
They’re scared. “Could be in the thousands” is an enormous walk back from Vought’s threats.
magdi.bsky.social
Look at what Neera Tanden was publishing in 2020, a few months before she was nominated by Biden for OMB. People tanked her nomination. People payed *much more attention* to her nomination than they ever did to Vought's. Time to ask "why?" & whether or not this behavior is bad.
magdi.bsky.social
Neera Tanden got in the news, stayed in the news, and drove social media discussion in a way Vought never has. If that doesn't show us the superficiality of some of our discussions, I don't know what else will. We like to debate what we have control over. What gives us "cred."
magdi.bsky.social
I feel like now is as good a time as ever to say that people on social media & in the news spent infinitely more time on Neera Tandem's nomination for OMB (2021) than they ever did for Russell Vought (2025). This difference, which is a pretty clear comparison, should tell us something.
magdi.bsky.social
They’re nervous. Recognize their anxiety. Work with that in mind. They don’t necessarily want this. Don’t give them more power than they have. If they seem nervous, take note. They seem nervous.
magdi.bsky.social
Republicans are nervous about this. Keep the pressure on them.
magdi.bsky.social
I don't think Republicans feel strong going into this shutdown. I think they actually feel weak. There are things that social media users can do to reinforce this weakness.
magdi.bsky.social
That's the nature of my comment: Republicans do not seem confident, including Vance. They seem a tad bit defensive. Watch and see if you observe the same. They don't feel great about this. Whatever you think Democrats should do, it is worth noting if Republicans are showing weakness.
magdi.bsky.social
I'm not going to comment on what Democrats should do. I have my opinion, but I always recognize that there are no good options. Here is what I will comment on. Republicans are often, in our view, "invulnerable." JD Vance did not appear invulnerable in his commentary today. He seemed nervous.
Reposted by Magdi Jacobs
stemthebleeding.bsky.social
I want to point a very important detail of this:

Jeffries is holding a press conference trashing Trump.

And only CSPAN is carrying it.

And that is the problem with America right now. The only place Democrats get any press coverage are places where no one watches.
atrupar.com
Jeffries: "Cancel the cuts, lower the costs, save healthcare. Not complicated. Eight words. Even Donald Trump should be able to understand that."
Reposted by Magdi Jacobs
kevinleecaster.bsky.social
Hunter Biden was an imperfect victim, so we dropped the ball by not highlighting that he was being attacked by a Republican weaponized DOJ. We thought we were being high and mighty on a pedestal of purity, but we were actually allowing the DOJ to become even worse.
magdi.bsky.social
Trump is weaponizing every lever of power he possesses--in the Federal Gov't & beyond--to persecute his political opponents/percieved enemies, as well as individual immigrants, college students, etc. He is accelerating this process. We need to look at all of this as a unified agenda.
magdi.bsky.social
Yet this is where we are. On a road paved with imperfection, paved, perhaps, with men we loathe, or people who we believe did perhaps do something wrong. To attend to the specifics of each case is a mistake. We should look, instead, towards orienting each case in the broader constellation.
magdi.bsky.social
Whereas the Civil Rights Movement actively sought "perfect" victims to elucidate social problems, the Trump administration has typically sought "imperfect" victims to advance the opposite: authoritarianism. Few of Trump's primary opponents--liberals--have any appetite to boldly defend John Bolton.
magdi.bsky.social
Think of the "deportees"--the disappeared--as well. Those who have seemed "perfect" at first induced public outcry; then their imperfections--in some cases serious crimes--came to light. Kimmel's case was diff. "Why go after *that* guy?" There will be more Boltons & Comeys b4 there are more Kimmels.
magdi.bsky.social
Most of Trump's victims thus far have been "imperfect;" Regardless of how one feels about the campus protests, these are clearly cases that divide the opposition. Clearly cases where, however *you* feel, some on the antifascist side feel very differently. This fragments & mutes public outcry.
magdi.bsky.social
The Civil Rights movement was all too familiar with the concept of "perfect" vs. "imperfect" victims, w/ the well-known cases of Rosa Parks & Claudette Colvin as exemplars. A "perfect" victim carries no "baggage" that distracts from the cause, faciliating a purer elucidation of the problem at hand.
magdi.bsky.social
When we talk about crime, we often cite the fact that victims aren't "perfect." Going after Kimmel was a tactical error because he is about as "perfect" a victim as one could target for political retribution, insofar as he's not a terribly political person. Bolton is an imperfect victim, as is Comey
magdi.bsky.social
Truly insane to take a moment and compare how we react to the indictment of James Comey today vs. how we reacted to the firing of James Comey in 2017, a multi-week/month news story. There are both historical & psychological factors at play here, all of which should be noted.
magdi.bsky.social
I am so sorry for what you have been through. People really do not understand what we're up against. We will find ways to tell our stories.