Join us and the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights on 9 December for our online event - 'The future of human rights and justice in the UK'
🎟️ Tickets here events.teams.microsoft.com/event/046a23...
news.stv.tv/scotland/sco...
news.stv.tv/scotland/sco...
Climate emergency, anyone?
Seems Scot Gov more interested in appeasing the lairds than protecting the environment.
raptorpersecutionuk.org/2025/10/09/s...
Climate emergency, anyone?
Seems Scot Gov more interested in appeasing the lairds than protecting the environment.
raptorpersecutionuk.org/2025/10/09/s...
Why the government was right to take PPE Medpro to court
The state should enforce its contractual rights against suppliers more often
By me, at @prospectmagazine.co.uk
www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/law/th...
Why the government was right to take PPE Medpro to court
The state should enforce its contractual rights against suppliers more often
By me, at @prospectmagazine.co.uk
www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/law/th...
@bjpaddy.bsky.social will discuss opportunities to boost walking, paths & access, as per our manifesto: ramblers.org.uk/ScotManifesto
Also expect @malcolmcombe.bsky.social, @cairngormsnews.bsky.social CEO Grant Moir & more!
For even if the government cannot recover all its damages and costs here, this case is still a signal to current and potential suppliers that it is willing to enforce it contractual rights.
And that is very valuable.
Many government suppliers do not believe the government will ever do this.
For even if the government cannot recover all its damages and costs here, this case is still a signal to current and potential suppliers that it is willing to enforce it contractual rights.
And that is very valuable.
Many government suppliers do not believe the government will ever do this.
www.strath.ac.uk/humanities/l...
www.strath.ac.uk/humanities/l...
the court *sua sponte* dismisses the case for violating Rule 8(a)
so that means the court, all on its own, looked at the complaint and said it's too long, too scattershot, too arbitrary to even count as a complaint. *never* seen this happen to a private party with counsel.
the court *sua sponte* dismisses the case for violating Rule 8(a)
so that means the court, all on its own, looked at the complaint and said it's too long, too scattershot, too arbitrary to even count as a complaint. *never* seen this happen to a private party with counsel.