Manuel Baltieri
@manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
810 followers 300 following 130 posts
Chief Researcher at Araya, Tokyo. #ALife, #AI, embodied and enactive #cognition. Information, control and applied category theory for cognitive science. https://manuelbaltieri.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
After a multi-year collaboration with Martin Biehl, @mattecapu.bsky.social and @nathanielvirgo.bsky.social, I’m stoked to share the first of (hopefully) many outputs:
“A Bayesian Interpretation of the Internal Model Principle”
arxiv.org/abs/2503.00511.

1/
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
marielgoddu.bsky.social
My comment on Fillipo Torresan & @manuelbaltieri.bsky.social's "Disentangled representations for causal cognition" in Physics of Life Reviews:
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

I argue that there is little meaningful analogy between learning from "pixels" vs "experience," but I praise
Disanalogies between causal learning in animals vs. machines: Comment on “disentangled representations for causal cognition” by F. Torresan & M. Baltieri
None.
www.sciencedirect.com
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
Shocking
manlius.bsky.social
So, your favorite/fancy/rich AI provider most likely cheats most of the time to score high in LLMs leaderboards.

Shocking, but totally expected, isn't it?

arxiv.org/abs/2504.20879

Where are the AGI Bros? 👌

#AI #LLM
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
highergeometer.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy
Igor, you legend. Don't stop being you.

There are ten more of these unreadable hypercube diagrams on the following pages....

Souce: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00682
Two hypercube-shaped category-theoretic diagrams, each covered with an unreadable mess of labels.
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
abalkina.bsky.social
My experience applying for retractions at Elsevier.
I've looked at paper mills since 2019 and drafted a preprint on a paper mill from an international publisher in 2021. I started contacting journals or research integrity teams to raise concerns about papers. Publishers react differently. 1/n
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
gordon.bsky.social
"We discuss the problem of running today’s software decades, centuries, or even millennia into the future" tinlizzie.org/VPRIPapers/t...
tinlizzie.org
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
Great to see a colleague speaking up, sad to think about the state of affairs.
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
kihbernetics.bsky.social
I don't want to delete anything. I simply agree with Barbieri's distinction and claim that for a successful syntactic relationship, there is no need for anticipation or computation.
On that level, the cell is a simple reliable #state machine (transducer) with no place for interpretation of meaning.
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
amahury.bsky.social
One of the most controversial corollaries of relational biology is the impossibility of simulating life. But what if I tell you that this claim is simply the result of misinterpreting Robert Rosen's ideas?

#complexitycat 🐈‍⬛👇🧵1/3

amahury.github.io/posts/trilog...
Relational Biology I: Is it possible to simulate life?
The first part of this trilogy is devoted to discussing the difference between model and simulation, one of the cornerstones for understanding relational biology. How true is it that Robert Rosen deni...
amahury.github.io
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
kordinglab.bsky.social
Re the Tononi paper: Both Tononi’s IIT (phi) and Friston’s FEP start from fundamental, axiomatic, and debatable assumptions. These assumptions are generally made without any humility. This logic allows them to make exceptionally broad claims. Which contributes to my unease about them.
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
Directed wiring diagrams for Mealy machines!
arxiv-math-ct.bsky.social
Keri D'Angelo, Sophie Libkind
Dependent Directed Wiring Diagrams for Composing Instantaneous Systems
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05457
Reposted by Manuel Baltieri
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
Secondly, we discuss how this form of Bayesian filtering is quite simplistic, 1) not making full use of Bayesian updates by ignoring observations from the environment/plant, and 2) assuming that beliefs of equicredible states of the environment are disjoint (they form a partition).

16/16
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
Importantly, this makes use of the fact that we have a Markov category, Rel^+, of possibilistic Markov kernels that can be used to specify beliefs as (sub)sets without assigning them probabilities, but that works very much like other “nice” Markov categories.

15/
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
We then show how this corresponds to a Bayesian filtering interpretation for a reasoner: how a controller modelling its environment can be understood as performing Bayesian filtering on its environment.

14/
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
Firstly, we show that the definition of model between two autonomous system can be “reversed” to build a “possibilistic” version of the internal model principle.

13/
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
After a reasonably self contained overview of string diagrams for Markov categories, and some definitions including Bayesian inference/filtering, their parametrised and conjugate prior versions, we dive into the main result, showing mainly two things.

12/
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
In the second part of the paper, we use results from a recent line of work (link.springer.com/chapter/10.1...) started by some of my collaborators on how to interpret a physical system as performing Bayesian inference, or filtering, using the language of Markov categories.

11/
Interpreting Dynamical Systems as Bayesian Reasoners
A central concept in active inference is that the internal states of a physical system parametrise probability measures over states of the external world. These can be seen as an agent’s beliefs...
link.springer.com
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
Our focus here is mostly technical and has to do almost entirely with control theory, but considering where the conversation started on the other platform, I hope that this will have an impact also in the cognitive and life sciences.

10/
manuelbaltieri.bsky.social
This is often taken to be 1) a better formalisation of Conant&Ashby’s good regulator “theorem”, and 2) the reason why talking about “internal models” is necessary in cognitive science, AI/ML/RL, biology and neuroscience.

/9