Gil Zamora
banner
mindfulinterviews.com
Gil Zamora
@mindfulinterviews.com
The mindful interviewer. Interviewed thousands as a forensic artist; interviewed real women abt how they perceived themselves; lecturing on efficacy of eyewitness interviews at SJSU and UNE. Author: The Mindful Interview Method, CRC press, 2023. No DMs.❌
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Don't drag your feet. I'll buy the ink. Laws are only suggestions without enforcement.
Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie say they're considering inherent contempt charges against Pam Bondi
Khanna and Massie's remarks came after Sen. Tim Kaine said that Congress has other mechanisms to force the release of additional Epstein files.
www.nbcnews.com
December 21, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
A few reminders about the SCOTUS immunity decision for Presidents:

It does not provide immunity for prior crimes.

It does not provide immunity to the President's cabinet.

Similar to Roe v. Wade, it can be overturned in the future.
December 21, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Somehow, Trump has "attorney-client privileges" located in the Epstein files.
December 21, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
BRENNAN: What are you going to do to force DOJ to comply?

MASSIE: The quickest way and most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi. That doesn't require going through the courts. We're drafting that right now.
December 21, 2025 at 3:43 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
The people running this country would break gravity if that were possible.
The atomic ensemble time scale at the NIST Boulder campus has failed.
December 20, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
December 21, 2025 at 12:56 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
The @oversightdemocrats.house.gov have done a great job on Epstein. My only suggestion to them, and to their colleagues, is that they say, instead of “we need transparency,” “we need the truth.” “We need the truth” is simple, kind of catchy…and true.
This photo, file 468, from the Epstein files that includes Donald Trump has apparently now been removed from the DOJ release.

AG Bondi, is this true? What else is being covered up? We need transparency for the American public.
December 20, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
oh look.
it's Jeffrey Epstein's "drawer of Trump photos."
Or as any other functioning justice system would call it, EVIDENCE.
December 21, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
As 2025 comes to an end, you decide the journalism you want to support!

Here's Law Dork: www.lawdork.com
December 21, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
The fact that random people on the Internet are outsmarting Trump's DOJ in detecting the removal of Epstein Files shows just how amateurish Pamela Jo Bondi and her D-list team are.

There are competent coverups and sloppy, easily detected coverups. This is the latter.
December 20, 2025 at 11:33 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
It’s important we call out the media attempts to soften the Epstein files.

These were not women.

They were children.

These rich and powerful people trafficked and raped children.

www.disabledginger.com/p/15-year-ol...
15 Year Olds are Children and they Need Protection
Why are we debating if pedophilia is 'really that bad'? To protect pedophiles. This carefully crafted PR narrative is designed to make you think children can consent to sex with adults. They can't.
www.disabledginger.com
December 20, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
After releasing the photo in Epstein's desk drawer of Trump with girls, they removed it. The picture wasn't new and had already been out in the public view, but now it's been removed from the official record. The DOJ is seriously corrupt and slimy.
December 20, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
At least 16 files disappeared from the Justice Department’s public webpage for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein — including a photo showing President Trump — less than a day after they were posted, with no explanation from the government and no notice to the public.
https://to.pbs.org/4p7dLvg
At least 16 files disappear from DOJ site for Epstein documents, including Trump photo
At least 16 files disappeared from the Justice Department’s public webpage for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein — including a photograph showing President Donald Trump — less than a day after they...
www.pbs.org
December 21, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Reup of this public resource we created

Timeline of Jeffrey Epstein-Ghislaine Maxwell Law Enforcement Failures (1996-2025)

with links to all the publicly available documents
Timeline of Jeffrey Epstein-Ghislaine Maxwell Law Enforcement Failures (1996-2025)
A comprehensive timeline of the failure of federal law enforcement to address Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's crimes.
www.justsecurity.org
December 20, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Also, this is from the Associated Press. Michael R. Sisak and David B. Caruso published this article in the AP about an hour before AltNPS posted without giving them credit, or providing a link to any source.

apnews.com/article/rele...
At least 16 files have disappeared from the DOJ webpage for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein
The Justice Department’s webpage for documents related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is missing at least 16 of its files a day after they were released.
apnews.com
December 21, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Goldman: This guy is so clearly trying to follow the Putin model—using the government to make money, making sure his allies control the most important companies in the country, including our media companies, doling out money by deregulating their industries, and taking money from them in return…
December 21, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
I don’t think the law passed by Congress said that DOJ has to release less than 1% of the materials by Dec 19.
December 20, 2025 at 11:52 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
December 20, 2025 at 1:30 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
HUGE NEWS from the new Epstein files:

Records show that Maria Farmer, who worked for Epstein, filed a "child pornography" report to the FBI in 1996.

The FBI has never before acknowledged that complaint. The case went nowhere, and mass abuse followed.

www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/u...
Epstein Files Include 1996 Child Porn Complaint That F.B.I. Ignored
www.nytimes.com
December 20, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
I mean it seems like the administration just keeps stepping on rakes. By releasing a buffoonishly redacted and incomplete set of docs they just prolong the story and suspicion. What’s the strategy here?
December 20, 2025 at 12:11 AM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Khanna: "The law clearly required all unclassified information being released today. They obviously have not complied with that law. They claim it's because it was only a few weeks -- well they've known about this for months."
December 19, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Let's have one of those shadow hearings.
Jack Smith still wants to speak in public:

In a new letter, Smith says he wants the American public to "hear the facts" about his two criminal cases against Trump — asking the House Judiciary Committee to release video of his closed-door deposition and schedule an open and public hearing.
Jack Smith says Americans should 'hear the fact' of Trump probes, wants deposition tapes released
Jack Smith wants the American public to “hear the facts” about his two criminal cases against Trump, asking Trump ally Jim Jordan to release video of his eight-
www.nbcnews.com
December 19, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Turns out Trump is not in the Epstein files after all
December 19, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
A non-existent paper attributed to ‪Ben Williamson‬ has already been cited 42 times.

It's like Scholarly Communication has been injected with misinformation bombs. Events are totally out of control. No one has a handle on its extent. And, there's no plan to stop it.

@benpatrickwill.bsky.social
Closing out my year with a journal editor shocker 🧵

Checking new manuscripts today I reviewed a paper attributing 2 papers to me I did not write. A daft thing for an author to do of course. But intrigued I web searched up one of the titles and that's when it got real weird...
December 19, 2025 at 6:18 PM
Reposted by Gil Zamora
Democracy Docket vs Washington Post.

It has never been more urgent to support independent, pro-democracy media. hubs.ly/Q03CbHTt0
December 19, 2025 at 6:57 PM