Never stop poasting
@persistentpoasting.bsky.social
Just keep poasting.
Trust The Plan™
Trust The Plan™
Pinned
We mourn what could have been and rage at what is.
The thought of doing CTR in the US is not a fun one.
one genuine terrifying thing about the (imo, unlikely, but possible) civil unrest/revolution in America is... who secures the nukes?
A civil war in the US very quickly spills over the Canadian border and probably draws them into the war one way or another.
January 25, 2026 at 4:17 PM
The thought of doing CTR in the US is not a fun one.
On that note, I do find the thought experiment of how it would work, if Canada joined a EU that had gotten a strong federal government.
THAT'S RIGHT.
Even if the Americans crash out and leave nato or burn their participation in it, the Transatlantic alliance with Canada shall persist.
Even if the Americans crash out and leave nato or burn their participation in it, the Transatlantic alliance with Canada shall persist.
January 23, 2026 at 12:14 AM
On that note, I do find the thought experiment of how it would work, if Canada joined a EU that had gotten a strong federal government.
THAT'S RIGHT.
Even if the Americans crash out and leave nato or burn their participation in it, the Transatlantic alliance with Canada shall persist.
Even if the Americans crash out and leave nato or burn their participation in it, the Transatlantic alliance with Canada shall persist.
January 23, 2026 at 12:00 AM
THAT'S RIGHT.
Even if the Americans crash out and leave nato or burn their participation in it, the Transatlantic alliance with Canada shall persist.
Even if the Americans crash out and leave nato or burn their participation in it, the Transatlantic alliance with Canada shall persist.
1. good
2. new sofa.
3. Actually just a non-starter (unless the DK and GL pm is lying) likely part of 2 depend on how they do it.
4. Is fine, subject to details.
Don't rly align with domestic reports, so the US thinks it got a deal it didn't. And there is no actual "deal". Only verbal agreement
2. new sofa.
3. Actually just a non-starter (unless the DK and GL pm is lying) likely part of 2 depend on how they do it.
4. Is fine, subject to details.
Don't rly align with domestic reports, so the US thinks it got a deal it didn't. And there is no actual "deal". Only verbal agreement
According to the @nytimes.com, the Trump-Rutte deal over Greenland includes:
- A new NATO mission in the Arctic region
- An update to the 1951 agreement
- Sovereing bases for the US military
- Restrictions to prevent Russia and China from extracting rare earths
All is still up for discussion.
- A new NATO mission in the Arctic region
- An update to the 1951 agreement
- Sovereing bases for the US military
- Restrictions to prevent Russia and China from extracting rare earths
All is still up for discussion.
After Trump’s Ultimatum, Greenland Talks Include Sovereign U.S. Bases, No Drilling for Russia
www.nytimes.com
January 22, 2026 at 10:25 PM
1. good
2. new sofa.
3. Actually just a non-starter (unless the DK and GL pm is lying) likely part of 2 depend on how they do it.
4. Is fine, subject to details.
Don't rly align with domestic reports, so the US thinks it got a deal it didn't. And there is no actual "deal". Only verbal agreement
2. new sofa.
3. Actually just a non-starter (unless the DK and GL pm is lying) likely part of 2 depend on how they do it.
4. Is fine, subject to details.
Don't rly align with domestic reports, so the US thinks it got a deal it didn't. And there is no actual "deal". Only verbal agreement
Aw fuck, I can't believe you've done this George.
(but also fuck the senators who actually voted for this)
(but also fuck the senators who actually voted for this)
pls do not yell at me over this
*HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDING BILL PASSES HOUSE VOTE
*HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDING BILL PASSES HOUSE VOTE
January 22, 2026 at 10:02 PM
Aw fuck, I can't believe you've done this George.
(but also fuck the senators who actually voted for this)
(but also fuck the senators who actually voted for this)
Lmao it's Literal SOFA update @mikeblack114.bsky.social
Incredible, Greenland's PM is now refuting the one part of this that represented any change to the status quo ante.
*GREENLAND PM: NOT AWARE OF TALKS ON MINERAL RESOURCES
*GREENLAND PM: NOT AWARE OF TALKS ON MINERAL RESOURCES
So literally nothing. Beautiful.
January 22, 2026 at 4:18 PM
Lmao it's Literal SOFA update @mikeblack114.bsky.social
Now let's see if things start to happen in the baltic. That'd be fun.
French outlet Le Monde reports that France has intercepted a Russian shadow fleet tanker.
www.lemonde.fr/internationa...
www.lemonde.fr/internationa...
January 22, 2026 at 3:50 PM
Now let's see if things start to happen in the baltic. That'd be fun.
Yeah, I did notice when the KoDk-Us meeting happened last week. The danish FM would just not stop saying "I'm no Chamberlain"
He said it again after the Trump-rutte meeting news went out.
He said it again after the Trump-rutte meeting news went out.
European senior diplomats are (indirectly) comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler
January 22, 2026 at 3:37 PM
Yeah, I did notice when the KoDk-Us meeting happened last week. The danish FM would just not stop saying "I'm no Chamberlain"
He said it again after the Trump-rutte meeting news went out.
He said it again after the Trump-rutte meeting news went out.
So there was some coordination about what rutte could mention to trump. Among them the 51 agreement, which reopening isn't a red line.
HOWEVER, any promises given to trump, we're on behalf of nato. Not Denmark.
HOWEVER, any promises given to trump, we're on behalf of nato. Not Denmark.
January 22, 2026 at 3:23 PM
So there was some coordination about what rutte could mention to trump. Among them the 51 agreement, which reopening isn't a red line.
HOWEVER, any promises given to trump, we're on behalf of nato. Not Denmark.
HOWEVER, any promises given to trump, we're on behalf of nato. Not Denmark.
I guess site J is getting expanded. Unless he just means reusing it for that. @mikeblack114.bsky.social
TRUMP: PIECE OF GOLDEN DOME WILL BE ON GREENLAND
January 22, 2026 at 1:25 PM
I guess site J is getting expanded. Unless he just means reusing it for that. @mikeblack114.bsky.social
lol. lmao even.
lol mate
*TRUMP: BIG RETALIATION IF EUROPE SELLS US ASSETS LIKE BONDS
*TRUMP: BIG RETALIATION IF EUROPE SELLS US ASSETS LIKE BONDS
January 22, 2026 at 1:08 PM
lol. lmao even.
Many are saying!
But yes, rebalanced relationship. Won't become fully apparent until Europe gets to a more comfortable place in terms of rearming.
But yes, rebalanced relationship. Won't become fully apparent until Europe gets to a more comfortable place in terms of rearming.
Latest post tries to catch up with the back and forth on Greenland. I argue that rather this being a rupture (as Mark Carney suggested) the European response shows a transition to a rebalanced transatlantic relationship with diminished US power. (£/free trial), open.substack.com/pub/samf/p/t...?
To Greenland and Back
Does NATO carry on as before?
open.substack.com
January 22, 2026 at 10:51 AM
Many are saying!
But yes, rebalanced relationship. Won't become fully apparent until Europe gets to a more comfortable place in terms of rearming.
But yes, rebalanced relationship. Won't become fully apparent until Europe gets to a more comfortable place in terms of rearming.
What a stupid and anticlimactic potential end to this thing. Yet, also kinda what was expected
Just so fucking absurd. Trump is happy, he made a deal in his head.
And the danish gov can't answer what it's the fucking thing.
Like fucking christ. And this is how we might have avoided a potential (trade)war over GL.
And the danish gov can't answer what it's the fucking thing.
Like fucking christ. And this is how we might have avoided a potential (trade)war over GL.
January 22, 2026 at 10:39 AM
What a stupid and anticlimactic potential end to this thing. Yet, also kinda what was expected
I suspect I might be finding the confusion over this thing more amusing than most people.
January 22, 2026 at 10:35 AM
I suspect I might be finding the confusion over this thing more amusing than most people.
I fucking can't man.
The US thinks they have a deal with DK and the DK doesn't know what the us thinks the deal contains.
January 22, 2026 at 10:33 AM
I fucking can't man.
That guess is based on report from axios(ew) and a DW USA correspondent. So it's likely that's what the us think they are getting.
Though the mineral parts is from another source.
No clarity what should be changed.
Though the mineral parts is from another source.
No clarity what should be changed.
I know I'm supposed to not be poasting, but this complete lack of clarity about what Trump thinks he agreed is too fucking good to not post about.
Best guess: reopening of 51' agreement, about mineral rights. Something vague to make it comply with domestic law.
No sovereignty to US
Best guess: reopening of 51' agreement, about mineral rights. Something vague to make it comply with domestic law.
No sovereignty to US
January 22, 2026 at 10:31 AM
That guess is based on report from axios(ew) and a DW USA correspondent. So it's likely that's what the us think they are getting.
Though the mineral parts is from another source.
No clarity what should be changed.
Though the mineral parts is from another source.
No clarity what should be changed.
I just couldn't stay away because fucking lmao.
I do have stuff to do this week. And so I will probably take a bit of a break from posting unless something major comes that requires a crash out.
January 22, 2026 at 10:28 AM
I just couldn't stay away because fucking lmao.
I know I'm supposed to not be poasting, but this complete lack of clarity about what Trump thinks he agreed is too fucking good to not post about.
Best guess: reopening of 51' agreement, about mineral rights. Something vague to make it comply with domestic law.
No sovereignty to US
Best guess: reopening of 51' agreement, about mineral rights. Something vague to make it comply with domestic law.
No sovereignty to US
January 22, 2026 at 10:22 AM
I know I'm supposed to not be poasting, but this complete lack of clarity about what Trump thinks he agreed is too fucking good to not post about.
Best guess: reopening of 51' agreement, about mineral rights. Something vague to make it comply with domestic law.
No sovereignty to US
Best guess: reopening of 51' agreement, about mineral rights. Something vague to make it comply with domestic law.
No sovereignty to US
Given the answers from the pm. Imma be real guys, I don't think the danish government knows whats in that agreement.
Domestic media is making a big deal out of the vagueness of the Trump-rutte "deal"
Pm Frederiksen: rutte doesn't have a mandate to negotiate on kingdoms behalf, negotiations on greenland are between the kingdom and the US.
Ofcourse we won't give up sovereignty to the US.
Lmao has rutte and trump made an agreement without danish input whatsoever at all.
Ofcourse we won't give up sovereignty to the US.
Lmao has rutte and trump made an agreement without danish input whatsoever at all.
January 22, 2026 at 10:11 AM
Given the answers from the pm. Imma be real guys, I don't think the danish government knows whats in that agreement.
Domestic media is making a big deal out of the vagueness of the Trump-rutte "deal"
Pm Frederiksen: rutte doesn't have a mandate to negotiate on kingdoms behalf, negotiations on greenland are between the kingdom and the US.
Ofcourse we won't give up sovereignty to the US.
Lmao has rutte and trump made an agreement without danish input whatsoever at all.
Ofcourse we won't give up sovereignty to the US.
Lmao has rutte and trump made an agreement without danish input whatsoever at all.
January 22, 2026 at 10:09 AM
Domestic media is making a big deal out of the vagueness of the Trump-rutte "deal"
Pm Frederiksen: rutte doesn't have a mandate to negotiate on kingdoms behalf, negotiations on greenland are between the kingdom and the US.
Ofcourse we won't give up sovereignty to the US.
Lmao has rutte and trump made an agreement without danish input whatsoever at all.
Ofcourse we won't give up sovereignty to the US.
Lmao has rutte and trump made an agreement without danish input whatsoever at all.
January 22, 2026 at 9:59 AM
Pm Frederiksen: rutte doesn't have a mandate to negotiate on kingdoms behalf, negotiations on greenland are between the kingdom and the US.
Ofcourse we won't give up sovereignty to the US.
Lmao has rutte and trump made an agreement without danish input whatsoever at all.
Ofcourse we won't give up sovereignty to the US.
Lmao has rutte and trump made an agreement without danish input whatsoever at all.
I do have stuff to do this week. And so I will probably take a bit of a break from posting unless something major comes that requires a crash out.
January 22, 2026 at 8:12 AM
I do have stuff to do this week. And so I will probably take a bit of a break from posting unless something major comes that requires a crash out.
Yeah basically what I said less politely when trump said it was important for the piss dome.
"The Kingdom of Denmark wishes to continue to engage in a constructive dialogue with allies on how we can strengthen security in the Arctic, including the US's Golden Dome, provided that this is done with respect for our territorial integrity."
Full statement.
Full statement.
Udtalelse fra statsminister Mette Frederiksen 22. januar 2026
stm.dk
January 22, 2026 at 8:02 AM
Yeah basically what I said less politely when trump said it was important for the piss dome.
Basically aligns with what the FM said last week
"JD Vance & Secretary of State Marco Rubio, had been 'pushing for a middle ground' on Greenland, while... Stephen Miller showed a willingness to keep annexation and the potential use of military force on the table ....the president had wanted to retain the option of a military move."
Trump reversal on Greenland followed push by aides against military option, sources say reut.rs/45ioNXK
January 22, 2026 at 6:14 AM
Basically aligns with what the FM said last week
That's almost t-shirt and shorts weather man
Nuuk hit 11.3C earlier this month!
January 22, 2026 at 4:47 AM
That's almost t-shirt and shorts weather man