Paul Price
@swimsure.bsky.social
2.6K followers 1.3K following 710 posts
Research: climate change science & policy. Blog: https://climate-change-and-ireland.ghost.io/ –Adjunct prof. Dublin City University ORCID: 0000-0002-7995-6712; –eNGO research & An Taisce member; MSc. Sus Dev & BSc(Hon) Geology 30 yrs pro carpentry. 🚲 🏊
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Paul Price
Reposted by Paul Price
roisinmoriarty.com
'As Raworth wrote in Doughnut Economics: “We have economies that need to grow, whether or not they make us thrive; what we need are economies that make us thrive, whether or not they grow.”'

Editorial in Nature - Beyond GDP
End GDP mania: how the world should really measure prosperity
The obsession with economic output as a measure of human development puts sustainability on the back burner. Researchers can now help to devise better indicators.
www.nature.com
Reposted by Paul Price
Reposted by Paul Price
roisinmoriarty.com
Excellent overview of the recent Overshoot conference at @iiasa.ac.at by @carbonbrief.org

Bottom line for me...the core message is the same...

it is more urgent than ever to take action to reduce emissions

every fraction of a degree matters #climateaction
Overshoot: Exploring the implications of meeting 1.5C climate goal ‘from above’ - Carbon Brief
The first-ever international conference on the contentious topic of “overshoot” was held last week in...
www.carbonbrief.org
swimsure.bsky.social
Disappointingly, "growth is good" was the core message in the lead-off keynote (economist) overview at the @seai-ie.bsky.social research conference yesterday. Along with following panel, it was as if Paris & carbon budgets & sectoral ceilings had never happened.
O/w the research presented was good.
Reposted by Paul Price
thinkorswim.bsky.social
Pod of this week’s Last Word on the Environment with Matt Cooper on Today FM now available.

Astute listeners may spot that I’m deeply unimpressed by our so-called “climate” minister, Darragh O’Brien, a man as out of touch with reality as he is out of his depth.

www.todayfm.com/podcasts/the...
Did The Government Ignore The Climate Crisis In Budget 2026?
Critics have accused the government of failing to adequately tackle climate change in Budget 2026, which was announced by Minister for Finance Paschal Donoho...
www.todayfm.com
Reposted by Paul Price
irishrainforest.bsky.social
"The eyes of future generations are on [us], silently urging us to act bravely and quickly [...] to save them from a collapsed biosphere.

Will we rise to the moment and earn the right to be regarded as 'good ancestors'?"

Crucial question, crucial book.

*Read it.*
Reposted by Paul Price
elainemcgoff.bsky.social
This, while shocking, could be fixed so quickly. It's simply not good enough, and our waterways are paying the price.

'over 40% of these failures were avoidable, caused by poor plant operation, equipment breakdowns, and inadequate maintenance, training, or procedures'
Reposted by Paul Price
greenprofgreen.bsky.social
Very important paper by @gregorsemieniuk.bsky.social that shows, as I have argued, that tax policy is climate policy. We cannot phaseout #fossilfuels without attacking their wealth.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Reposted by Paul Price
andrewlrjackson.bsky.social
Happy to see this new article published yesterday - co-authored with @orlakelleher.bsky.social

“The implications of the European Court of Human Rights' climate rulings for climate litigation in Ireland: a new legal reality”, in the Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal
Reposted by Paul Price
maxdubler.com
Class 1 e-bikes, which require pedaling and have electric assist that tops out at 18mph, are very different than throttle-operated class 2 and 3 bikes, which are themselves very different from the bigger, faster electric motorcycles that are proliferating under the “ebike” label.
davidzipper.bsky.social
My unpopular urbanist opinion is that big, hyperfast two-wheelers are a menace and should be banned from bike lanes/paths (with enforcement).

These things endanger everyone riding a bike or legal e-bike. Worse, they deter some from even trying.
E-bikes have evolved into e-motorcycles. Law enforcement is lagging behind.
Serious injuries are on the rise in emergency rooms around the country, as electric cycles become bigger and faster. Lawmakers and police departments are scrambling to address the problem.
www.inquirer.com
Reposted by Paul Price
tupped.bsky.social
See this?

This story is the sound of a bullet you didn’t even know was coming at you whistling past your right ear.
suzannesmalley.bsky.social
Germany will not support Chat Control - a law which proposes to scan all messages people send even on end-to-end encrypted platforms - Justice Minister said today. German stance likely dooms the measure. Signal had threatened to leave the EU if Chat Control became law
therecord.media/chat-control...
Germany will not support 'Chat Control' message scanning in the EU
“Random chat monitoring must be taboo in a constitutional state,” Federal Justice Minister Stefanie Hubig said as German officials signaled they will not vote for a controversial EU proposal known as ...
therecord.media
Reposted by Paul Price
elainemcgoff.bsky.social
This is honestly the stupidest thing I've heard in a long time- banning the use of the words burger & sausage on plant based products.

The world is burning & war ravaged, & this is what our Parliamentarians think they need to 'fix'?

P.S. Fish also don't have fingers, right @oisinc.bsky.social?
swimsure.bsky.social
For sure! Even so, getting past wrongly equating AI Mode with genAI was a still mental block that kept me from looking at it 🙄
I hadn't realised that it could integrate our usage, battery in/out with low cost night grid, and solar forecast.
Or, as surprisingly, how it would solve for these.
Sigen AI Mode screenshot of Production & Consumption Forecast (kW) for load consumed, PV solar produced, sell battery to grid, and charge battery from grid.
swimsure.bsky.social
As with this switch possibility, we are still trying to understand our 5-mo old PV-battery system & future options. Partly by not knowing what questions to ask.
– eg we did not turn on "AI" (offputting name!) until 2 weeks ago, turns out its adding ~€1+/day revenue & saving more grid FF via battery.
Sigen app screenshot of AI Mode versus standard self-consumption.
swimsure.bsky.social
"MEPs shred few remaining environmental safeguards in EU farm policy" –@eeb.org
'In a vote today the European Parliament pushed ahead with dangerous drive to “simplify” [=deregulate] the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) by gutting its few remaining environmental protections'
eeb.org/meps-shred-f...
MEPs shred few remaining environmental safeguards in EU farm policy
Brussels, 8 October 2025 – In a vote today the European Parliament pushed ahead with a dangerous drive to “simplify” the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) by gutting its few remaining environmental pro...
eeb.org
Reposted by Paul Price
philkearney.bsky.social
Full credit to @autofac.bsky.social, Prof John Sweeney, @hannahdaly.ie & @swimsure.bsky.social for authoritative and persuasive presentations to the Joint Oireachtas Committee.
swimsure.bsky.social
🇮🇪Out Now:
Good new science-informed "Report on proposed Carbon Budgets" from (parliamentary) Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy'.

Recommendations 1-10 echo scientific & eNGO concerns for CB transparency in meeting Paris Agreement goals.

data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachta...
Title page Ireland JCCEE Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets:

An Comhchoiste um Aeráid, Comhshaol agus  Fuinneamh  Tuarascáil maidir leis Buiséid Charbóin atá beartaithe  Deireadh Fómhair 2025  

Joint Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy  Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets  October 2025  

34/CEE/02 Joint Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy  Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets  October 2025, p 13-14.

"18. Expert scientists who subsequently presented to the Committee acknowledged  the Council’s responsiveness however, having reviewed the CCAC’s cycle 2 ‘Paris  Test’ analysis, held the view that it remains unsatisfactory, highlighting several  concerns, particularly in relation the statutory requirement for consistency with  Article 2 of the Paris Agreement. The Committee heard that for the purpose of the  test, the Council chose not to compare the peak of Irish warming contribution to  the peak of global warming around 2050, but rather compare the significantly  lower Irish warming contribution as of 2100 to the projected global peak in 2050.  Experts warned the Committee that this approach ‘amounted to comparing apples  and oranges’, and if adopted, would allow collective global scenarios where the  temperature peak could substantially exceed the 1.5°C limit. In addition, the test  relies on the reference year of 2020 as a basis for equitable differentiation. It was  noted by Professor McMullin that this “directly conflicts with the professional  ethical advice commissioned by the council itself” which found that choice of year  “lay well outside the climate ethics consensus”. Professors McMullin and Sweeney  noted that 2015, the year the Paris Agreement was signed, is the latest possible  “defensible” year for determining differentiated responsibilities and capacities Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets  under Article 2 of that agreement. The Committee also notes from its submissions,  other analysis which demonstrate that none of Council’s recommended  temperature neutrality scenarios would pass the CCAC 2021 ‘Paris Test.’.  Professor John Sweeney emphasised that equity principles and climate justice  demand more ambitious mitigation or more limited budgets from countries such  as Ireland." Ireland JCCEE Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets, Recommendations 1-4:

1. The Committee recommends that the Council’s carbon budget proposal and reports  are subjected to an open and independent peer review process. The Committee is of  the view that the Minister and Government should consider, following the conclusion  of the independent peer review, aligning targets in line with the previous ‘Paris Test’  and not temperature neutrality as proposed in the draft budget. The adoption of  2015 as the year of reference for the basis of equitable differentiation is also  encouraged, as is the use of a comparable reference year of 2050 to measure  Ireland’s contribution to peak global warming.  2. The Committee recommends that prior to finalisation of the Carbon Budgets for  2030-2025 and 2035-2040, the Minister should request that CCAC review their final  carbon budget proposals to ensure that they are consistent with;  - The achievement of the National Climate Objective including climate neutrality,  defined as net-zero all GHG emissions by 2050.  - Article 2 of the Paris Agreement, including both the temperature goals and the  principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective  capacities”.  3. The Committee notes the importance of gaining insights from those with specific  expertise and for providing opportunities for wider societal engagement.  Acknowledging witness approval of the IPCC open peer review process, the  Committee recommends that the CCAC engage an open-access system whereby  people can volunteer to provide comments and feedback on the development of  carbon budget proposals. Such system would require the CCAC to publish draft  forms of ongoing reports, making them available for peer review.  4. The Committee recommends the clear identification of major barriers inhibiting the  achievement of Ireland’s climate goals and resulting in the exceedance and rollover Ireland JCCEE Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets, Recommendations (4 continued to 10).

4 continued: of the carbon budgets, noting that failure to meet targets in each budgetary cycle  will have a carry-over impact on subsequent budgets and does not adhere to the  principle of fairness between global north and south.  5. The Committee recommends that while finalising or revising the carbon budgets,  and subsequent sectoral allocations, the Government immediately prepare credible  measures to ensure a Just Transition across all sectors of society.  6. The Committee recommends that the Government immediately conduct a review  into the efficacy and adequacy of the Just Transition measures employed during the  first carbon budget and to produce a report and recommendations within 6 months.  7. The Committee recommends that the Council’s carbon budget proposal and reports  are subjected to an open and independent socio-economic analysis.  8. The Committee recommends that while finalising or revising the carbon budgets and  subsequent sectorial emissions ceilings, the Government immediately prepares  credible measures to ensure the carbon budgets are delivered without undermining  with other priorities that have a mandate from the public, including critical  infrastructural and strategic priorities.  9. The Committee recommends that, in light of the projected exceedance of the first  two carbon budgets, there should be an urgent review and increase of actions to  facilitate the just transition to a sustainable low-carbon economy and society. The  scale of the challenge and ambition must be communicated effectively and clearly to  all sectors of society.  10. The Committee recommends the phase out of fossil fuels at the earliest possible  date and their replacement with sustainable energy produced in Ireland, to form the  central part of the state’s energy strategy.
swimsure.bsky.social
Thanks. Guess we need to find out if that's the case for our own grid-tied system (I don't think so).
swimsure.bsky.social
In USA as in the EU, moral hazard acceptance by government in support of business-as-usual is the core underpinning for agriculture policy.
Any regulatory or economic policy that increases BAU costs typically results in bailouts & money for BAU agri.
Ireland is a case exemplar for livestock support.
karlykingsley.bsky.social
So the American taxpayer eats it twice, once on tariffs and again on a second farm bailout. I’m glad farmers are getting help, no one should lose their farm, but it’s remarkable how fast “socialism” stops being a dirty word when the checks clear in red counties.
swimsure.bsky.social
🇮🇪Out Now:
Good new science-informed "Report on proposed Carbon Budgets" from (parliamentary) Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy'.

Recommendations 1-10 echo scientific & eNGO concerns for CB transparency in meeting Paris Agreement goals.

data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachta...
Title page Ireland JCCEE Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets:

An Comhchoiste um Aeráid, Comhshaol agus  Fuinneamh  Tuarascáil maidir leis Buiséid Charbóin atá beartaithe  Deireadh Fómhair 2025  

Joint Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy  Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets  October 2025  

34/CEE/02 Joint Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy  Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets  October 2025, p 13-14.

"18. Expert scientists who subsequently presented to the Committee acknowledged  the Council’s responsiveness however, having reviewed the CCAC’s cycle 2 ‘Paris  Test’ analysis, held the view that it remains unsatisfactory, highlighting several  concerns, particularly in relation the statutory requirement for consistency with  Article 2 of the Paris Agreement. The Committee heard that for the purpose of the  test, the Council chose not to compare the peak of Irish warming contribution to  the peak of global warming around 2050, but rather compare the significantly  lower Irish warming contribution as of 2100 to the projected global peak in 2050.  Experts warned the Committee that this approach ‘amounted to comparing apples  and oranges’, and if adopted, would allow collective global scenarios where the  temperature peak could substantially exceed the 1.5°C limit. In addition, the test  relies on the reference year of 2020 as a basis for equitable differentiation. It was  noted by Professor McMullin that this “directly conflicts with the professional  ethical advice commissioned by the council itself” which found that choice of year  “lay well outside the climate ethics consensus”. Professors McMullin and Sweeney  noted that 2015, the year the Paris Agreement was signed, is the latest possible  “defensible” year for determining differentiated responsibilities and capacities Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets  under Article 2 of that agreement. The Committee also notes from its submissions,  other analysis which demonstrate that none of Council’s recommended  temperature neutrality scenarios would pass the CCAC 2021 ‘Paris Test.’.  Professor John Sweeney emphasised that equity principles and climate justice  demand more ambitious mitigation or more limited budgets from countries such  as Ireland." Ireland JCCEE Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets, Recommendations 1-4:

1. The Committee recommends that the Council’s carbon budget proposal and reports  are subjected to an open and independent peer review process. The Committee is of  the view that the Minister and Government should consider, following the conclusion  of the independent peer review, aligning targets in line with the previous ‘Paris Test’  and not temperature neutrality as proposed in the draft budget. The adoption of  2015 as the year of reference for the basis of equitable differentiation is also  encouraged, as is the use of a comparable reference year of 2050 to measure  Ireland’s contribution to peak global warming.  2. The Committee recommends that prior to finalisation of the Carbon Budgets for  2030-2025 and 2035-2040, the Minister should request that CCAC review their final  carbon budget proposals to ensure that they are consistent with;  - The achievement of the National Climate Objective including climate neutrality,  defined as net-zero all GHG emissions by 2050.  - Article 2 of the Paris Agreement, including both the temperature goals and the  principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective  capacities”.  3. The Committee notes the importance of gaining insights from those with specific  expertise and for providing opportunities for wider societal engagement.  Acknowledging witness approval of the IPCC open peer review process, the  Committee recommends that the CCAC engage an open-access system whereby  people can volunteer to provide comments and feedback on the development of  carbon budget proposals. Such system would require the CCAC to publish draft  forms of ongoing reports, making them available for peer review.  4. The Committee recommends the clear identification of major barriers inhibiting the  achievement of Ireland’s climate goals and resulting in the exceedance and rollover Ireland JCCEE Report on the proposed Carbon Budgets, Recommendations (4 continued to 10).

4 continued: of the carbon budgets, noting that failure to meet targets in each budgetary cycle  will have a carry-over impact on subsequent budgets and does not adhere to the  principle of fairness between global north and south.  5. The Committee recommends that while finalising or revising the carbon budgets,  and subsequent sectoral allocations, the Government immediately prepare credible  measures to ensure a Just Transition across all sectors of society.  6. The Committee recommends that the Government immediately conduct a review  into the efficacy and adequacy of the Just Transition measures employed during the  first carbon budget and to produce a report and recommendations within 6 months.  7. The Committee recommends that the Council’s carbon budget proposal and reports  are subjected to an open and independent socio-economic analysis.  8. The Committee recommends that while finalising or revising the carbon budgets and  subsequent sectorial emissions ceilings, the Government immediately prepares  credible measures to ensure the carbon budgets are delivered without undermining  with other priorities that have a mandate from the public, including critical  infrastructural and strategic priorities.  9. The Committee recommends that, in light of the projected exceedance of the first  two carbon budgets, there should be an urgent review and increase of actions to  facilitate the just transition to a sustainable low-carbon economy and society. The  scale of the challenge and ambition must be communicated effectively and clearly to  all sectors of society.  10. The Committee recommends the phase out of fossil fuels at the earliest possible  date and their replacement with sustainable energy produced in Ireland, to form the  central part of the state’s energy strategy.
Reposted by Paul Price
yungenchee.bsky.social
'Carbon offsets fail to cut global heating due to ‘intractable’ systemic problems'

"Analysis of 25 years of evidence shows most schemes are poor quality and fail to lower emissions"

Yes, I bang on about this. C market & ff flogs continue to profit from distraction👇, so continual pushback needed