32 | lesbiab | trying to art
The bill could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters by requiring documents like passports or birth certificates to register to vote and forcing voter roll purges. The Senate must reject it.
which means everything they said about it being client-side and face images not being uploaded is now false"
which means everything they said about it being client-side and face images not being uploaded is now false"
THIS ACT IS DESIGNED TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST AND DISENFRANCHISE LARGE GROUPS OF VOTERS!
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
apnews.com/article/hous...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
THIS ACT IS DESIGNED TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST AND DISENFRANCHISE LARGE GROUPS OF VOTERS!
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
apnews.com/article/hous...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
The house has voted to pass HJ RES 140 & it’s now on its way to the senate to be voted on.
Take ACTION & call/email your senators NOW! Here are some helpful websites that help find your senators & a script to read/email
-> www.savetheboundarywaters.org/June25
I could remove every speck of risque imagery/topics from my community and there's still a 50% chance we'd get flagged just because we're openly queer.
It's not actually about the kids.
I could remove every speck of risque imagery/topics from my community and there's still a 50% chance we'd get flagged just because we're openly queer.
It's not actually about the kids.
(working on myself a new con badge, lol)
(working on myself a new con badge, lol)
- States can restrict online speech if it is "adult".
- The mere depiction of homosexual existence can be objectionable adult content.
A plus B equals C
- States can restrict online speech if it is "adult".
- The mere depiction of homosexual existence can be objectionable adult content.
A plus B equals C
Deanonymization is censorship.
The Supreme Court is now taking away your right to anonymously *read* a form of speech. If speaking can mean that your readers have to subject themselves to potential consequences to read it, how can there be freedom of speech?
by @mattburgess1.bsky.social:
Deanonymization is censorship.
The Supreme Court is now taking away your right to anonymously *read* a form of speech. If speaking can mean that your readers have to subject themselves to potential consequences to read it, how can there be freedom of speech?
Just a punch directly in the wallet, and pledge not to resub until they walk it back.
Just a punch directly in the wallet, and pledge not to resub until they walk it back.
One of the richest men in the world fired them from the paper and didn’t even pay to ensure they got home.
Abolish the billionaire class:
One of the richest men in the world fired them from the paper and didn’t even pay to ensure they got home.
Abolish the billionaire class:
There is still a need for you to blow up your rep's phones on this if you enjoy being able to do things like "post" or "have an porn"
There is still a need for you to blow up your rep's phones on this if you enjoy being able to do things like "post" or "have an porn"
Bestie, you are older than ICE.
That isn't neutral - that is a political and ideological statement that they want more reliance on these tools
That isn't neutral - that is a political and ideological statement that they want more reliance on these tools
“For 280 days we haven’t eaten a single piece of fruit, banana, apple, orange, or anything fresh. We are all in one big room with no doors or windows. We can’t see any grass or trees. We are all constantly sick."
“For 280 days we haven’t eaten a single piece of fruit, banana, apple, orange, or anything fresh. We are all in one big room with no doors or windows. We can’t see any grass or trees. We are all constantly sick."
“For 280 days we haven’t eaten a single piece of fruit, banana, apple, orange, or anything fresh. We are all in one big room with no doors or windows. We can’t see any grass or trees. We are all constantly sick."
www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...