Andy Bruce (Reuters)
@bruceandy.bsky.social
6.1K followers 1.4K following 14K posts
Bit of this, bit of that at Reuters. UK economy and north of England correspondent. ☀️ Stockport ☀️ 💬 Signal: bruce.369
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
bruceandy.bsky.social
Drop me a line if you:
💁have an interesting story to tell
⚠️think an issue needs national press attention
☕️have insight into big institutions or powerful people
🙊heard interesting rumours or gossip

DM/Signal in bio

@reuters.com has a long history of protecting sources
bruceandy.bsky.social
Excellent point
reactionordinary.bsky.social
The RIAA was suing teenagers. We had to sit through ⬇️ this shit anytime we wanted to watch a DVD. A whole generation shamed for using Limewire and torrents. Only for these silicone valley assholes to now find copyright infringement a necessary evil they shouldn’t have to answer for
You wouldn’t steal a car
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
michaelsderby.bsky.social
Reuters/Ipsos poll finds strong majority of Americans oppose Trump’s use of soldiers as cops, also “Trump's approval rating on crime fell in the latest poll to 41% from 43% in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted September 5-9.”
www.reuters.com
bruceandy.bsky.social
what the UK borrows (revenue - spending) determines what the DMO issues down the line
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
petertl.bsky.social
This photo from Portland by @reuters.com's Carlos Barria 👌
A demonstrator dressed in an inflatable frog costume stands infront of law enforcement officers during a protest outside of the ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) headquarters in south Portland, Oregon, U.S., October 3, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
sundersays.bsky.social
What an admirably clear statement from the Jewish Leadership Council, especially when all of those involved must surely have been dealing with so many other urgent challenges in safety, security and grief + shock today before having this further divisive and distracting intervention to address too.
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
resfoundation.bsky.social
None of the proposed two-child limit options are as efficient in lifting children out of poverty as fully scrapping the policy.

Fully abolishing the two-child limit should be the starting point of any successful Child Poverty Strategy.

Read more➡️ buff.ly/DyvTYGN
Table 1 shows the cost per child lifted out of poverty for fully scrapping the two-child limit 
and each of the floated options. The only option that has a similar cost-effectiveness to full 
abolition is exempting families who are in work, at £7,540 per child lifted out of poverty, 
(compared to £7,480 for full abolition). The lower cost-effectiveness of the other options 
should be considered alongside the issues outlined above that each option would introduce.
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
adamcorlett.bsky.social
One funny thing in OBR forecasts & maybe a reason to be more fiscally cheerful: they assume markets are right about high future borrowing costs (compare to Europe), but separately assume that inflation will be 2% and nominal pay growth very low. Fiscally the worst of both worlds, but not consistent?
bruceandy.bsky.social
Interesting line in the Wikipedia profile of New Zealand psychologist Nigel Latta, who died the other day aged 58.
Wikipedia profile section which reads: 
Personal life

Latta had a daughter and a son from his first
marriage (1991-2020).[16] He met his second
wife, Natalie Flynn, in 2018, when they began
working together on his Parentland app.[17]18]
Flynn is also a clinical psychologist [3l They
married in 2023.

Latta was a user of profanity when not on
air.[7İ[16]
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
ironeconomist.bsky.social
I do not understand what Labour think the immigration system is for. I accept there are many possible answers here but what is their ideology that drives this?
jack-bailey.co.uk
I think Jonathan is being too polite: this policy is straightforwardly stupid. Other countries will make attractive offers that encourage hard-working, capable, and interesting people to choose them over us, and the UK will be worse off for it. And for what?
jdportes.bsky.social
Apart from the unnecessary hardship this will inflict on individuals, this will be bad for integration and social cohesion, bad for the economy, and will increase irregular migration.

[And, as @robfordmancs.bsky.social has shown, it's hugely unpopular and out of step with the British public]
bruceandy.bsky.social
Thanks. Makes sense - just wanted to check as so much of the mainstream commentary out there is people saying the BoE was too loose during the 2010s.

Which as you say, is wrong.
bruceandy.bsky.social
Probably being pedantic here as agree with your overall point that it's a terrible indictment of those times that we didn't get close to achieving the conditions you describe
bruceandy.bsky.social
Great thread. On the great sin of post GFC Mon Pol - are you arguing that m pol should have been even looser to raise demand to that point?

I'd always read the sin as overall macro policy - govt v clear that its strategy (such as it was) hinged on ultra loose MP. BoE never going to push against
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
chrisgiles.ft.com
The biggest puzzle in the UK economy is why non pension savings are so high

For decades no one could get Brits to save. Now they won’t stop.

That this has happened without a recession shows UK economy under last and this govt is not the basket case I read about
bruceandy.bsky.social
And to this day she is still doing the Treasury's bidding with her fruity diatribes.
bruceandy.bsky.social
Liz Truss had two years in the same gig, but I have a theory about that: she was a Manchurian Candidate-style plant (no lettuce pun intended) as Treasury Brain emerged from her premiership stronger than ever.
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
cjayanetti.bsky.social
You don't have to be in hock to bond markets. You just have to have tax and spending plans that wouldn't melt the calculator of a seven year old
bruceandy.bsky.social
And this one is an ex-Treasury minister!
bruceandy.bsky.social
Well I'm not going back to this
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
stephenkb.bsky.social
I do feel a bit like I am going insane today, in that the sheer number of 'government sources' going 'Andy Burnham's plans don't add up!', I mean, true, but lads, can we talk about how similar they are to *your* plans?
michaeljsc.bsky.social
haha, that’s a good one, so I guess Starmer has a plan to face up to fiscal reality, right?
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
michaeljsc.bsky.social
haha, that’s a good one, so I guess Starmer has a plan to face up to fiscal reality, right?
Reposted by Andy Bruce (Reuters)
johnspringford.bsky.social
This is a good policy. Tax wonks are pretty united on national insurance being a bad tax, because it means labour income is taxed more than other forms, and adds to complexity
ruthcurtice.bsky.social
Report out on tax options for the Budget. 2p income tax rise alongside 2p national insurance cut would mean no tax rise for an employee whose income comes from a job. With employment overtaxed at the moment, workers pay packets should be protected and distortions in the tax system removed.
2p switch from National Insurance to Income Tax could raise £6 billion while protecting workers’ pay packets • Resolution Foundation
The Chancellor should protect workers’ pay packets and level the playing field on how different forms of income are taxed – including a 2p cut in employee National Insurance (NI) offset by a 2p rise i...
www.resolutionfoundation.org
bruceandy.bsky.social
I suspect the lattermost - trouble is he wants to borrow £40b for housing according to that Telegraph interview.
bruceandy.bsky.social
Burnham knows all that - he's been a cabinet minister.

But then you read this 👇...

Looks fiscally expansive and yet: "We’ve got to get beyond this thing of being in hock to the bond markets."

What to make of it?