Christian Julliard
@christianjulliard.net
2.7K followers 510 following 70 posts
I think, read, write, teach (and take photos). Associate Professor @LSEFinance. I study the interaction between financial markets and the macroeconomy. https://christianjulliard.net
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
christianjulliard.net
🚨 "Consumption in Asset Returns" (w. Svetlana Bryzgalova
& Jiantao Huang) forthcoming @ Journal of Finance

We use asset returns to uncover the elusive dynamics of consumption.
Turns out, financial markets know a lot about future consumption—and it matters for both macro & asset pricing
🧵👇 1/n
Reposted by Christian Julliard
paulgp.com
@econmsk.bsky.social and Levine's new WP on Fertility in high-income countries has two remarkable graphs

www.nber.org/papers/w3398...

The first shows the enormous shift up in share of women delaying / choosing to not have any kids across cohorts:
christianjulliard.net
My flight to Chicago landed in Milwaukee, leaving me stranded and miss my connection to London. A learning experience: consumer protection in US v EU is (dark) night v day.
christianjulliard.net
Bottom line:

✅ Financial markets help identify the true process of consumption

✅ This helps solve long-standing asset pricing puzzles

✅ Time-varying volatility of consumption? Probably not the main story behind time-varying risk premia
12/n
christianjulliard.net
What about time-varying risk premia?
Contrary to many models, we find no evidence that stochastic volatilities in consumption drive them.
Instead, it’s the (shocks to the) conditional mean of consumption the main link between consumption and returns.
11/n
christianjulliard.net
We verify these mechanisms with a plethora of perturbations to specification / data / frequencies / etc
No matter how we slice it, the result holds: consumption reacts slowly but strongly to financial shocks, & these slowly propagating shocks command very large risk premia.
10/n
christianjulliard.net
Is this Long Run Risk?
Not verbatim, but rather medium run / business cycle risk: consumption reacts to priced shocks fully within 2-3 years.
Hence, priced consumption risk is about what happens within the next business cycle, rather than hundred years down the line.
9/n
christianjulliard.net
We embed our estimated process into a standard recursive utility model.
With low risk aversion, it explains both the equity premium and the risk-free rate puzzles.
No need for exotic preferences or extreme calibrations.
8/n
christianjulliard.net
To validate our identification, we turn to micro data.
Only stockholders’ consumption responds to financial shocks.
Non-stockholders’ doesn’t. Aggregate consumption sits in between.
Exactly what theory predicts.
7/n
christianjulliard.net
These shocks aren’t just statistically significant—they’re economically meaningful. They command an annual Sharpe ratio of ~0.5 (as large as the market!) and explain a large share of stock return variation (and a modest but significant share of bond excess returns too).
6/n
christianjulliard.net
Using a flexible state-space model we find that aggregate consumption reacts over multiple quarters to shocks spanned by financial markets, accounting for over 25% of consumption variation.
5/n
christianjulliard.net
Hence, news about current and future priced consumption states are immediately reflected in prices, and we can use returns to learn about consumption dynamics.
4/n
christianjulliard.net
Our identification strategy is grounded in theory:

📌 The Euler equation links consumption and returns

📌 Asset prices are “jump” variables—they react to shocks as they occur
3/n
christianjulliard.net
Most consumption-based asset pricing models rely on “dark matter”--ingredients very powerful in action, yet almost impossible to see with a naked eye or easily verify.

We turn this identification problem on its head: Instead of going from consumption to returns, we go the other way round. 2/n
christianjulliard.net
🚨 "Consumption in Asset Returns" (w. Svetlana Bryzgalova
& Jiantao Huang) forthcoming @ Journal of Finance

We use asset returns to uncover the elusive dynamics of consumption.
Turns out, financial markets know a lot about future consumption—and it matters for both macro & asset pricing
🧵👇 1/n
Reposted by Christian Julliard
donmoyn.bsky.social
New from @chloeneast.bsky.social at Can We Still Govern:
AEI cited her work to make the case for SNAP work requirements. Chloe explains that her and other research show that work requirements reduce SNAP access while doing nothing for employment outcomes.
donmoynihan.substack.com/p/what-aei-g...
What AEI Gets Wrong about SNAP Work Requirements
They cited my research, so let me respond!
donmoynihan.substack.com
Reposted by Christian Julliard
kyledcheney.bsky.social
BREAKING: Judge McFadden has *granted * the AP’s injunction against the White House’s ban on access to the Oval Office and East Room.
Reposted by Christian Julliard
Reposted by Christian Julliard
econberger.bsky.social
Google searches for "filing for unemployment":

1/ This thread is inspired by the great @aaronsojourner.org , who is a pioneer (along with @paulgp.com and Elizabeth Pancotti) in nowcasting unemployment insurance claims using Google Trends data.
Reposted by Christian Julliard
dinapomeranz.bsky.social
I have already decided not to come to the US for conferences or talks anymore for the time being. This is particularly painful as I used to live there (for 12 years)...
sgadarian.bsky.social
International students will stop coming to American universities if their visas are going to be at risk. This will make our intellectual community poorer and also make tuition more expensive for domestic students.
jaweedkaleem.bsky.social
UPDATED: At least 83 students -- at campuses for University of California, California State University and Stanford -- have had their visas revoked as of Monday evening.
christianjulliard.net
(Marketing with?) fear of a run
christianjulliard.net
If I had not cancelled already my monthly donation to @theguardian.com because of the economic illiteracy of their editorial team, this attack on central bank independence would have been the last straw
christianjulliard.net
We should go after all the economists stating “Let $(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, P)$ denote ….” without ever citing Kolmogorov
bellmanequation.bsky.social
Possibly the dumbest of the many dumb plagiarism claims
nationalpost.com/news/mark-ca...