Dan Calverley
@dancalverley.bsky.social
360 followers 960 following 24 posts
Researcher on climate & energy. Co-founder, producer, word-wrangler @clim8uncensored. PhD environmental engineering. 5 yrs cycling the world, studying forms of the good life.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Dan Calverley
eddavey.libdems.org.uk
Elon Musk openly called for violence on our streets yesterday.

I hope politicians from all parties come together to condemn his deeply dangerous and irresponsible rhetoric.

Britain must stand united against this clear attempt to undermine our democracy.
Reposted by Dan Calverley
doctorvive.bsky.social
"Would it really threaten the global ruling class if the world phased out fossil fuels? The answer to this question—Malm and Carton’s exegesis of the wealth lost if we stopped using coal, oil, and gas—lies at the core of Overshoot."

lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-...
Los Angeles
The Point, However, Is to Change It
In advance of Andreas Malm and Wim Carton's forthcoming book "The Long Heat:
Climate Politics When It's Too Late," Genevieve Guenther revisits the authors' 2024 title
"Overshoot: How the World Surrendered to Climate Breakdown."
By Genevieve Guenther • September 13, 2025
ENVIRONMENT
POLITICS
ECONOMICS AND FINANCE
Reposted by Dan Calverley
thierryaaron.bsky.social
As the world rapidly heads into #climate #overshoot I've noticed a disturbing pattern in journal articles recently.

I'll summarize it quickly in this thread 🧵
Reposted by Dan Calverley
tg42birder.bsky.social
A great distillation from @dancalverley.bsky.social of the choice we all face now - to change and adopt new lifestyles or to carry on burning carbon as we follow our current selfish paths.
Reposted by Dan Calverley
georgemonbiot.bsky.social
1. This is something I've been saying for 25 years, but it's hard to get many people to listen. What counts is not the new energy sources you add, but the old ones you retire. Unfortunately it's politically easier to build renewables than to shutter fossil fuels.🧵
www.forbes.com/sites/rrapie...
The Renewable Illusion: Why Fossil Fuels Keep Winning
Global renewables hit records in 2024, but fossil fuel use still rises. Here’s why solar’s surge isn’t enough—and what the latest energy data really shows.
www.forbes.com
Reposted by Dan Calverley
Reposted by Dan Calverley
charliejgardner.bsky.social
Can anyone who is a parent, but not a climate activist in any form, please explain to me why not?
Reposted by Dan Calverley
jksteinberger.bsky.social
The neoliberal dream of fossil fuel billionaire Charles Koch was always the destruction of US democracy and the elimination of government (except for its repressive organs police, courts, prisons, military ofc), and now he has won.
What now? A 🧵.
1/
t.co/FKxxmLyfce
Headline "US democracy has died"
Reposted by Dan Calverley
georgemonbiot.bsky.social
1. There have been plenty of debates about whether or not Trump and his circle are fascists. In this column, I argue that the debate solves nothing. What we’re seeing is a reversion to the default state of politics in centralised societies: autocratic tyranny. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Trump and Musk have launched a new class war. In the UK, we must prepare to defend ourselves | George Monbiot
Across the world, societies are reverting to oligarchies. How to resist? Fight for democracy with all we’ve got, writes Guardian columnist George Monbiot
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Dan Calverley
georgemonbiot.bsky.social
8. To counter the spiral requires massive political effort: dissent, protest, non-cooperation and the building of alternatives on a vast scale. The response by power will be extreme repressive violence. Only societies prepared to withstand it produce alternatives to tyranny.
Reposted by Dan Calverley
peteknapp.bsky.social
I have an issue with your first two paragraphs: you’re comparing aviation and concrete emissions

This ignores the inequality and choice of flying

Concrete is a systemic issue that no individual can affect. Flying cannot be compared this way

Your framing doesn’t focus on the root cause: inequality
Screenshot of the article’s first two paragraphs
Reposted by Dan Calverley
andyscollick.bsky.social
From a security perspective, this is how the future looks:

Gated communities (GC)
In survival-favourable locations
Defended by private military companies
Using lethal and non-lethal weapons
To secure GC inhabitants and infrastructure / resources (food, water, energy)
From climate displaced people
paleofuture.bsky.social
“Will pay any amount.”

Feels like one of those futile pleas we’re going to hear from wealthy people more and more in the era of climate change.
Keith Wasserman: Does anyone have access to private firefighters to protect our home in Pacific Palisades? Need to act fast here. All neighbors houses burning. Will pay any amount. Thank you.
Reposted by Dan Calverley
benjgeo.bsky.social
Has a more than 10x increase in fossil fuels really been essential for the population growing by 3x?
dancalverley.bsky.social
Hang on, why does getting back to 1950s levels of energy consumption equate to everyone 'going back' to hunter-gathering or subsistence farming? How many of our grandparents were hunter-gatherers? (Not saying more energy – fossil or renewable – isn't required to support a bigger population).
dancalverley.bsky.social
Good article, but OMG the frothing at the mouth climate denial in the comments section is off the charts!
Reposted by Dan Calverley
the-breakdown.bsky.social
“Big companies will use their market power to drive up prices in the event of a crisis.”

NEW: Listen to @meadwaj.bsky.social explain climate-flation in our very festive @macrodosepod.bsky.social x Break Down crossover episode

www.break-down.org/post/year-in-review-a-macrodose-crossover
Reposted by Dan Calverley
Reposted by Dan Calverley
benjgeo.bsky.social
I don't think scientists have any more insight into this than anyone else tbh.
charliejgardner.bsky.social
How do scientists think about the future - do they see collapse as inevitable now, do they think it can be delayed, or can it still be avoided through transformation?

Facinating, timely research from Sam Finnerty and pals
bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Reposted by Dan Calverley
hetanshah.bsky.social
That is some graph on bus usage outside London after deregulation
on.ft.com/49PfLlV
Bus usage outside London has fallen since the market was deregulated, while London bus usage has grown