@drjohartland.bsky.social
350 followers 94 following 58 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
drjohartland.bsky.social
Hi, I’m Jo (they/them)

Queer ex-NHS Dr, academic in health justice education & activist in #LGBTQ+ rights

You can read about my work in my NTF blog social.advance-he.ac.uk/aWwcxH

And my Attitude Pride Award youtu.be/xfHNDqsi428

Follow for queer & political posts, with occasional thirsty vanity
This ex-doctor turned activist is on a mission to create a more inclusive healthcare system
YouTube video by Attitude Magazine
youtu.be
Reposted
drjohartland.bsky.social
As a team that includes trans and non-binary people we know any criticism we make of Cass will be seen as ideological

This is why we grounded our work in a methodical critique, using established tools

Whilst our identities still matter, this is about the poor and biased application of methodology
chris-noone.bsky.social
Just out! Our peer-reviewed critique of the Cass Review has been published by BMC Medical Research Methodology. Please read and share. We show that the Cass Review is fatally flawed and should not be the basis for policy or practice in transgender healthcare.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Reposted
elequinn.bsky.social
Proud to have been apart of this team. Research methodology matters. Policy should be based on methodologically sound research. Our results show the many methodological flaws of the Cass Review. Check it out ⬇️
chris-noone.bsky.social
Just out! Our peer-reviewed critique of the Cass Review has been published by BMC Medical Research Methodology. Please read and share. We show that the Cass Review is fatally flawed and should not be the basis for policy or practice in transgender healthcare.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Reposted
ghawinriver.bsky.social
It took us over a year to get this thing out through a peer review process because actual review takes time. Actual, non-bribed, non compromised review goes through iterations, and anything that went through "peer review" in a suspiciously short time is suspect.

Anywho, the Cass Review is busted.
chris-noone.bsky.social
Just out! Our peer-reviewed critique of the Cass Review has been published by BMC Medical Research Methodology. Please read and share. We show that the Cass Review is fatally flawed and should not be the basis for policy or practice in transgender healthcare.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
drjohartland.bsky.social
This sounds so theoretically awesome. I’ve not watched any of this season, I will but my enthusiasm was killed by the writing of the last one. Ncuti deserved better
Reposted
emanemz.bsky.social
When your kids heart is completely broken and there is nothing you can do 😞.
Emily in a blue and white football kit, hair in a plait playing with a football. Statement off Emily’s Instagram account.
drjohartland.bsky.social
As a team that includes trans and non-binary people we know any criticism we make of Cass will be seen as ideological

This is why we grounded our work in a methodical critique, using established tools

Whilst our identities still matter, this is about the poor and biased application of methodology
chris-noone.bsky.social
Just out! Our peer-reviewed critique of the Cass Review has been published by BMC Medical Research Methodology. Please read and share. We show that the Cass Review is fatally flawed and should not be the basis for policy or practice in transgender healthcare.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
drjohartland.bsky.social
They literally owe us nothing. It’s our jobs to ensure all people are treated equally and to challenge prejudice in healthcare whoever it affects
Reposted
anotherjon.bsky.social
Cass Review "should not be the basis for policy or practice in transgender healthcare."

Kudos to the authors, incl:
@chris-noone.bsky.social
@elequinn.bsky.social
@floralashes.bsky.social
@gilmorejnurse.bsky.social
@ghawinriver.bsky.social
@ryan-goulding.bsky.social
@drjohartland.bsky.social
chris-noone.bsky.social
Just out! Our peer-reviewed critique of the Cass Review has been published by BMC Medical Research Methodology. Please read and share. We show that the Cass Review is fatally flawed and should not be the basis for policy or practice in transgender healthcare.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
drjohartland.bsky.social
Honestly Ellie far more intelligent people drove this than me, but I was very glad to help where I could
Reposted
katymontgomerie.com
The Cass Review gets peer reviewed and absolutely shredded

Cass is the Wakefield of our time. A scandal in broad daylight
drjohartland.bsky.social
As said in another post, I’m delighted to have contributed with amazing authors to this peer-reviewed paper highlighting deep methodological flaws in the Cass report

Too often this is upheld as a perfect example of evidence based medicine, when in truth there are clear and worrying inconsistencies
chris-noone.bsky.social
Just out! Our peer-reviewed critique of the Cass Review has been published by BMC Medical Research Methodology. Please read and share. We show that the Cass Review is fatally flawed and should not be the basis for policy or practice in transgender healthcare.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
drjohartland.bsky.social
Delighted to be named with amazing authors on this peer-reviewed paper highlighting deep methodological flaws in the Cass report

Far too often it is upheld as perfect evidence based medicine, when in truth there are clear worrying inconsistencies

bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Reposted
smolrobots.bsky.social
It got identified as the next wedge issue after gay marriage and the American right started covertly funneling money to the tiny minority of UK bigots in order to help mainstream their position. They picked up some famous converts and now they're reaping the rewards. It's entirely manufactured.
theashpreston.bsky.social
Not going mad am I, when I say that I'm sure trans rights was less of a vocal issue say 15 years ago? Like trans people were more accepted weren't they? The silly slang terms always existed, but they were treated better weren't they? What exactly changed to embolden the more open awful treatment?
Reposted
itsmattagain.bsky.social
If a court refuses to hear legal arguments from one whole side then its decision can hardly be considered fair, impartial, or balanced.
drjohartland.bsky.social
Trans women are < than 1 in 1,000 people

Statistically the most dangerous person in a woman’s life is a man she already knows and shares a home with

Nothing about today changes this fact

This is a manufactured well-funded plan to radicalise you & normalise far right ideology
drjohartland.bsky.social
Today’s ruling makes no-one safer. It makes vulnerable people more vulnerable, and does nothing to protect women from the epidemic of male violence

The time wasted harassing, legislating and controlling such a small population of the UK only makes sense through a lens of bigotry